TITLE

No Diversity Jurisdiction against Third Party Defendant

AUTHOR(S)
Young, Rowland L.
PUB. DATE
October 1978
SOURCE
American Bar Association Journal;Oct78, Vol. 64 Issue 10, p1585
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the United States Supreme Court's ruling on the case, Owen Equipment and Erection Company v. Kroger. Court's decision that in a diversity action a plaintiff may not assert a claim against a third party defendant from the same state; Case background; Opinion of the court written by Justice Stewart; Dissenting arguments.
ACCESSION #
4803628

 

Related Articles

  • JURISDICTION (SUBJECT MATTER).  // International Law Update;Nov2000, Vol. 6, p172 

    Presents two cases related to subject matter jurisdictions in the United States. Details on the lawsuit filed by Iraola and Cia SA against Kimberly-Clark Corp.; Claim of a diversity jurisdiction of federal courts over cases involving foreign entities; Dismissal of Geo Med from the case to...

  • Should The U.S.A. Retain The Connally Reservation To The Jurisdiction Of The World Court? CON.  // Congressional Digest;Jan1961, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p25 

    Argues against retaining Connally Reservation to the jurisdiction of United Nations International Court of Justice as of January 1960 in the United States. Impact of the amendment on foreign relations of the country; Composition of the court; Gains from withdrawing the reservation for the country.

  • Should The U.S.A. Retain The Connally Reservation To The Jurisdiction Of The World Court? CON. Briggs, Herbert W. // Congressional Digest;Jan1961, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p27 

    Argues against retaining Connally Reservation to the jurisdiction of United Nations International Court of Justice as of January 1960 in the United States. Objections to the peremptory domestic jurisdiction reservation; Reference to Interhandel lawsuit; Potential dangers to the country's...

  • PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION TO AFFECT SUBSTANTIVE DECISIONS. Thrower, Randolph W. // National Tax Journal;Sep74, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p389 

    Comments on the state of public interest litigation in the U.S. and its effect on the substantive decisions of courts. Objections to the recognition of public interest litigation; Appropriateness of jurisdictional requirements in the context of public interest tax litigation to prevent...

  • Illinois county once again leads list of 'hellholes'. Hofmann, Mark A. // Business Insurance;12/20/2004, Vol. 38 Issue 51, p1 

    The article presents information about a report about law reforms in Illinois. Victor E. Schwartz, general counsel of the American Tort Reform Association, called for more work to tackle such problems during a press conference in Washington D.C., last week, where the group unveiled its "Judicial...

  • THE COMPLEXITY OF JURISDICTIONAL CLARITY. Dodson, Scott // Virginia Law Review;Mar2011, Vol. 97 Issue 1, p1 

    The article explores the issue regarding the complexity of the aspects of jurisdictional complexity in the U.S. It discusses the gap between law doctrine and rhetoric with emphasis on the lack of clarity in the doctrine and the jurisdictional clarity of the rhetoric. The article also explains...

  • Toward Reasonable Limitations on the Exercise of General Jurisdiction. Heiser, Walter W. // San Diego Law Review;Summer2004, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p1035 

    This article focuses exercise of general jurisdiction. One of the most controversial aspects of the current jurisprudence of personal jurisdiction is the concept of general jurisdiction. General jurisdiction refers to a state's exercise of personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant in a...

  • Lapides v. Board of Regents and the Untrustworthiness of Unanimous Supreme Court Decisions. Horton, Paul // San Diego Law Review;Summer2004, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p1057 

    The article focuses on the untrustworthiness of unanimous Supreme Court decisions in the United States with reference to Lapides v. Board of Regents case. According to the author, the U.S. Supreme Court deals with weighty issues framed in heated controversy, often with splits between whole...

  • New Amendments to Federal Venue, Removal, and Other Rules. Smith, Charles S. // Pretrial Practice & Discovery;Winter2012, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p25 

    The article discusses changes made to the U.S. Judicial Code under the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011 (JVCA), which went into effect on January 6, 2012. The JVCA clarifies and simplifies the federal rules on venue and timing of removal for multiple-defendant...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics