TITLE

Ohio Death Penalty Is Killed

AUTHOR(S)
Young, Rowland L.
PUB. DATE
September 1978
SOURCE
American Bar Association Journal;Sep78, Vol. 64 Issue 9, p1420
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Details the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the capital punishment case Lockett v. Ohio. Provisions of the Ohio death penalty statute; Offenses charged against the defendant; Concurrence of several justices that the Court's decision holding that the death sentence in the case violated the 8th and 14th amendments; Court reversal of the imposition of the death penalty.
ACCESSION #
4799101

 

Related Articles

  • FOOLED AGAIN.  // Better Homes & Gardens;Apr2004, Vol. 82 Issue 4, p268 

    Looks into an 1893, U.S. Supreme Court decision to classify fruits that are usually served as part of dinner as vegetables. Definition of fruits according to botanists; List of fruits that are classified as fruits; Description of each.

  • Supreme Court Considers Revising Rule. Comey, Philip // Corrections Today;Oct2005, Vol. 67 Issue 6, p15 

    Reports on the plan of the U.S. Supreme Court to rethink whether to allow appeals by death row inmates who claim they have been wrongly convicted. Issues involving capital punishment; Information on death penalty cases.

  • THIRD PARTY STANDING--"NEXT FRIENDS" AS ENEMIES: THIRD PARTY PETITIONS FOR CAPITAL DEFENDANTS WISHING TO WAIVE APPEAL. Brown, Paul F. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1991, Vol. 81 Issue 4, p981 

    This article analyzes the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Whitmore v. Arkansas involving third party petitions for capital defendants wishing to waive appeal. The Court held that a third party may not petition for stay of defendant's capital sentence if the defendant competently...

  • Supreme Court Declines To Review Voluntary-Prayer Case. Heard, Alex // Education Week;12/21/1981, Vol. 1 Issue 15, p8 

    The article reports on the refusal of the Supreme Court to hear an appeal by a group of high-school students who wanted to hold voluntary prayer meetings in a public schools in the U.S. The group at Guiderland High School called Students for Voluntary Prayer appealed the decision of the U.S....

  • TBP to appeal to Supreme Court to overturn court order for retrial. Trow, Robert // Body Politic;May81, Issue 73, p12 

    Focuses on the plan of "The Body Politic" journal to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to upheld a County Court's decision on charges filed against its publisher Pink Triangle Press for using mails to transmit immoral and indecent material. Overview of the case; Ruling issued on the case.

  • Travelers Has Supreme Court Date. Lehmann, R. J. // Best's Review;Feb2009, Vol. 109 Issue 10, p10 

    The article reports on a consolidated case appealed at the U.S. Supreme Court. According to the article, the travelers filed the petition which claims that the direct actions against the insurer deviates from the confirmation order that extended beyond the insurance policy. In addition, the...

  • Travesty Time, Again. Bork, Robert H. // National Review;3/28/2005, Vol. 57 Issue 5, p17 

    Discusses Rogers v. Simmons, the Supreme Court's decision that a murderer under the age of 18 when he committed his crime cannot be given the death penalty. Suggestion that the Court majority exhibited the combination of lawlessness and moral presumption which increasingly characterizes its Bill...

  • Court hears sides on how juries decide death sentences. Locy, Toni // Buffalo Law Journal;12/15/2005, Vol. 77 Issue 100, p4 

    The article reports on the argument session of the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the inner workings of jury decisions to impose death sentences, held on December 7, 2005. The Oregon Supreme Court overturned the decision of the state's highest court in the case of Oregon versus Guzek involving...

  • Court Strikes Down Death Penalty for Juveniles. Samuels, Christina A. // Education Week;3/9/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 26, p26 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court last week struck down the death penalty for juvenile offender, saying that both a national consensus and research on the adolescent brain make it misguided to equate the failings of a minor with those of an adult. The 5-4 decision on March 1...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics