TITLE

A look at the mighty five of antitrust

AUTHOR(S)
Keeffe, Arthur John
PUB. DATE
February 1979
SOURCE
American Bar Association Journal;Feb79, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p281
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents news briefs pertaining to law in the U.S., as of February 1979. Five antitrust cases decided at the 1976-77 term of the U.S. Supreme Court; Impact of punitive dishonorable discharge on recalcitrant soldiers; Major jurisdiction of the tax court.
ACCESSION #
4792175

 

Related Articles

  • Punitive Damages: Achieving Fairness and Consistency after State Farm v. Campbell. Sud, Nitin // Defense Counsel Journal;Jan2005, Vol. 72 Issue 1, p67 

    Discusses issues concerning the constitutionality of punitive damages according to the U.S. Supreme Court. Purpose of punitive damages under Section 908(1) of the Restatement of Torts; Disadvantages of excessive punitive damages for the defendants; Ways by which states and courts have reduced...

  • Fla. court rules in favor of uninjured plaintiff. Moore, Miles // Tire Business;12/20/2004, Vol. 22 Issue 19, p25 

    The article reports that a Florida state appeals court has ruled that the plaintiff in a product liability case involving Firestone tires on a Ford Explorer is entitled to seek punitive damages despite suffering no physical injury. The accident in question occurred in October 1999, when...

  • The Insurability of Punitive Damages. Schumaier, Steven G.; McKinsey, Brian A. // ABA Journal;Mar1986, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p68 

    Explains the insurability of punitive damages in the United States. Jurisdictions that allow the insurability of damages without exception and in cases of vicarious liability; Basis for allowing an assault in favor of insurability; Case that reflects the traditional view against the...

  • Punitive Damages. Olson, Theodore B.; Boutrous Jr., Theodore J. // ABA Journal;Jan1991, Vol. 77 Issue 1, p40 

    Argues that the imposition of punitive damages increases the arbitrariness of the compensation system in the U.S. Prohibition of vicarious liability for punitive damages; Constitutional guarantee of due process.

  • Punitive Damages: Move on to curb high awards. Quade, Vicki // American Bar Association Journal;Jun83, Vol. 69 Issue 6, p727 

    Reports on the efforts of appellate courts to reduce punitive damages awards in product liability cases in the U.S. Affirmation of trial court dismissals of other punitive damages; Provisions of the Uniform Product Liability Act; Need to have legislatively mandated maximum on a punitive damage...

  • Are punitive damages getting out of control? Potter, Louis B.; Corboy, Philip H. // ABA Journal;Dec84, Vol. 70 Issue 12, p16 

    Presents arguments for and against the use of punitive damages in civil actions in the United States. Definition of punitive damages; Standards on the use of punitive damages; Restrictions on the use of punitive damages.

  • `Would I be covered if...?'. Mangan, Joseph F. // Insurance Advocate;09/14/96, Vol. 107 Issue 36, p12 

    Discusses' state policies on insured exemplary damages. Laws in California, Colorado, Connecticut prohibiting such type of contracts; Decision by the Insurance Services Office to insert a punitive damages exclusion in its liability forms; Implications for insurance companies.

  • U.S. Supreme Court Asked To Rein In Unconstitutional Application Of Punitive Damages.  // Insurance Advocate;12/16/2002, Vol. 113 Issue 47, p10 

    Focuses on the appeal of civil justice reform advocates for the U.S. Supreme Court to strengthen constitutional guidelines in punitive damages. Details on the lawsuit between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Curtis V. Campbell and Inez Preece Campbell; Assessment of punitive damages;...

  • COLLECTIVE REWARDS AND LIMITED PUNISHMENT: SOLVING THE PUNITIVE DAMAGES DILEMMA WITH CLASS. Mesulam, Semra // Columbia Law Review;May2004, Vol. 104 Issue 4, p1114 

    After the Supreme Court's 2003 decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, a coherent reading of the Court's punitive damages jurisprudence signals a prohibition on multiple punitive awards. Claim aggregation is necessary in mass tort cases where multiple punitive awards...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics