TITLE

Trauma Attending in the Resuscitation Room: Does It Affect Outcome?

AUTHOR(S)
Porter, John M.; Ursic, Caesar
PUB. DATE
July 2001
SOURCE
American Surgeon;Jul2001, Vol. 67 Issue 7, p611
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Although there are no Class I data supporting the regionalization of trauma care the consensus is that trauma centers decrease morbidity and mortality. However, the controversy continues over whether trauma surgeons should be in-house or take call from home. The current literature does not answer the question because in all of the recent studies the attendings who took call from home were in the resuscitation room guiding the care. We believe the correct question is: Does the presence of the trauma attending in the resuscitation room make a difference? At a university-affiliated Level II trauma center data from the trauma registry, resuscitation room flowsheet, and dictated admission notes were reviewed on all patients over a 6-month period. Data points were: attending present in the resuscitation room, standard demographics, resuscitation room time, time to operating room (OR), time to CT scan, length of stay, complications, and mortality. A total of 943 patients were studied with 216 (23%) having the attending present in the resuscitation room and 727 (77%) without the attending present. The groups were similar in terms of age, sex, Injury Severity Score, percentage Injury Severity Score greater than 15 (16--17.1%), and mechanism of injury (24-29% penetrating). Of all the data points studied only time to the OR had a statistically significance difference (P < 0.05) with it taking 43.8 minutes (+/- 20.1) when the attending was present and 109.4 minutes (+/- 107) when the attending was absent. There were also no missed injuries, delays to the OR, or inappropriate workups when the attendings were present. Only the time to the OR reached statistical significance. The time to the OR is indicative of the decision-making process in the resuscitation room, and it is in this area that the attendings' presence is the most useful. Also, we believe that it is important that there were no missed injuries, delays to the OR, or inappropriate workups when the attending...
ACCESSION #
4789790

 

Related Articles

  • Curbing unnecessary ED visits. Pinkowish, Mary Desmond // Patient Care;3/15/1995, Vol. 29 Issue 5, p110 

    Presents the reprint of `Prospective identification and triage of nonemergency patients out of an emergency department: A 5-year study,' by RW Derlet, D Kinser, L Ray, et al in `Ann Emerg Med 1995.'

  • Hospital ER visits hit 15-year high.  // Nation's Health;Sep93, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p4 

    Reports on the increase in hospital emergency room visits for the first quarter of 1993 which posted a 15-year high. Percentage increase; Percentage drop in the same period for 1992.

  • Brochure educates on emergency visits.  // AHA News;2/3/97, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p6 

    Features a brochure developed by Pennsylvania hospitals, health systems and emergency physicians in an effort to limit unnecessary emergency-department visits. Availability.

  • Majority of emergency room visits are for non-emergencies.  // Nation's Health;Apr94, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p9 

    Reports on Americans' use of local hospital emergency rooms for primary care. Persons with the highest rate of emergency room visits overall; Racial factor in emergency room visits; Most frequent source of payment for emergency care.

  • Studies show problems of diverting ER patients. Greene, Jay // Modern Healthcare;3/11/96, Vol. 26 Issue 11, p6 

    Reports on the findings of a study which indicates potential problems with the movement to divert nonemergency patients from hospital emergency departments, published in the March 7, 1996 issue of the `New England Journal of Medicine.' Difficulties with monitoring patients needing emergency and...

  • Emergency stats. Voelker, Rebecca // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;2/28/96, Vol. 275 Issue 8, p584 

    Considers how more than 90 million Americans visited an emergency department in 1992, according to a survey from the National Center for Health Statistics. Common reasons that patients sought care; Most frequent diagnosis made in emergency departments.

  • The continuing rise in emergency admissions. Capewell, Simon // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);4/20/96, Vol. 312 Issue 7037, p991 

    Reports on the increase in emergency admissions in Great Britain. Bed crisis in winter 1995; Major contributions to the rise; Decreasing length of hospital stay as increasing the risk of premature discharge; Detection of additional disease by more serious investigators; Lack of evidence of any...

  • Is it time to rethink cost-cutting in the ED? Ventura, Marissa J. // RN;Jan97, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p12 

    Reports on the effects of decreasing the use of the emergency departments (ED) of hospitals in the United States. Percentage of national health care expenditures accounted for EDs.

  • Hospital emergency department visits reach a 15-year high.  // American Family Physician;10/1/1993, Vol. 48 Issue 5, p708 

    Presents statistics on the number of visits to hospital emergency departments during the first three months of 1993. Survey by the American Hospital Associated reported in the journal Medicine & Health; Total outpatient visits to community hospitals; Overall hospital use; Change due to increase...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics