TITLE

APPEALS COURT: NEXTWAVE KEEPS SPECTRUM

AUTHOR(S)
Gohring, Nancy
PUB. DATE
July 2001
SOURCE
Interactive Week;7/2/2001, Vol. 8 Issue 26, p20
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit over wireless licenses once owned by NextWave Telecom. Information on NextWave's dispute with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission; Reason of the commission for not appealing the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court; Recommended arrangement between NextWave, the commission, and the reauction license winners.
ACCESSION #
4781539

 

Related Articles

  • Abernathy: Access Issue's Alive. Hearn, Ted // Multichannel News;6/3/2002, Vol. 23 Issue 22, p3 

    Informs that the decision of U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit on line-sharing rules was a setback for the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Comments of media and telecommunications analyst Blair Levin on the decision of the court; Views of FCC member Kathleen Abernathy on...

  • Media ownership ruling could impact FCC's biennial review process.  // RCR Wireless News;2/25/2002, Vol. 21 Issue 8, p10 

    Reports that the ruling made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, on November 19, 2001, on media ownership, could affect the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) process for reviewing rules every two years. Purpose of the ruling; Basis of the rule reviewing...

  • APPEALS COURT DUMPS FCC'S EQUAL-TIME REGS. McClintock, Pamela // Variety;10/16/2000, Vol. 380 Issue 9, p121 

    Reports that the United States (U.S.) Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia objected to the political editorial and personal attack rules of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. Reaction of broadcasters to the ruling; How the legal action is justified; Purpose of the agency's rules.

  • COURT STRIKES DOWN CROSS-OWNERSHIP BAN.  // Quill;May2002, Vol. 90 Issue 4, p7 

    Focuses on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia which rejected the cable-broadcast cross-ownership ban. Implication of the ban for companies; Origin of the cross-ownership rules; Court order for the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to decide about the...

  • NCTA Tops FCC Over Sheetrock Rules. Hearn, Ted // Multichannel News;3/15/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 11, p50 

    Reports on the February 2004 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit disapproving a rule by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that prohibits cable operators from removing cable wires embedded in Sheetrock. Reason for the prohibition of wire removal according to...

  • Court ruling gives rural wireline carriers more time for WLNP. Weaver, Heather Forsgren // RCR Wireless News;3/21/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p14 

    Reports on the move of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to examine the impact of its wireless local number portability rules on small wireline carriers. Compliance of FCC to the requirements of Regulatory...

  • FCC v. WNCN LISTENERS GUILD: AN OLD-FASHIONED REMEDY FOR WHAT AILS CURRENT JUDICIAL REVIEW LAW. Koch, Charles H. // Administrative Law Review;Fall2006, Vol. 58 Issue 4, p981 

    The article reflects on the significance of a 1981 dialogue between jurists of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Supreme Court to the guidance of the present judicial review law. The dialogue was between the Federal Communications Commission and WNCN...

  • COURT FINDS TV 'EIGHT VOICES RULE' ARBITRARY.  // Quill;Jun2002, Vol. 90 Issue 5, p7 

    Reports on the remand order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on the eight voices rule of the Federal Communications Commission in April 2002. Overview of the eight voices test that concern radio and television ownership; Rationale behind the remand order.

  • Appeals court trashes hours of service rules. Macklin, Gary // Refrigerated Transporter;Jul2004, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p17 

    Focuses on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals to drop the new hours of service rules governing the operation of commercial vehicles. Impetus behind the decision of the governing body; Concept behind the hours of service rules; Impact of the official decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics