TITLE

IN PRAISE OF SUPREME COURT FILIBUSTERS

AUTHOR(S)
McGinnis, John O.; Rappaport, Michael B.
PUB. DATE
January 2010
SOURCE
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter2010, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p39
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
An essay is presented on the operation of the filibuster rule with regard to the judicial confirmation process in the United States Senate. It discusses how these rules affect the Supreme Court nominees that can get confirmation from the Senate. It also concludes that filibusters preserve the judicial review while moderating its rules.
ACCESSION #
47692837

 

Related Articles

  • FILIBLUSTER. Hertzberg, Hendrik // New Yorker;6/13/2005, Vol. 81 Issue 17, p63 

    Comments on the controversies facing the U.S. Senate over judicial filibusters. Conflict between the Republicans and Democrats regarding nominations for Supreme Court justices; Debate over the constitutionality of filibuster; Issue of democracy surrounding the Senate and judicial filibusters.

  • Senate GOP Should Filibuster Elena Kagan. Erickson, Erick // Human Events;7/19/2010, Vol. 66 Issue 25, p1 

    The article provides information about Solicitor General Elena Kagan's extreme views that allegedly makes her unfit to serve in the U.S. Supreme Court. She is referred to as the most political and radical nominees in the history of U.S., and the Senate is preparing for a full debate regarding...

  • TODAY'S SENATE CONFIRMATION BATTLES AND THE ROLE OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY. O'Scannlain, Diarmuid F. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall2003, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p169 

    Discusses the role of the U.S. federal judiciary. Original conception of the federal judiciary; Information on the failed nomination of George H. Williams to the U.S. Supreme Court; Details of the personal appearance of judicial nominees before the U.S. Senate.

  • Alito's 1985 Views Prompt Senate Uproar. Victor, Kirk; Smallen, Jill; Mitchell, Charlie // National Journal;11/19/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 47/48, p3639 

    This article deals with the response of the U.S. Senate to the nomination of Samuel A. Alito Jr. to the Supreme Court in November 2005. The likelihood of a fierce Senate battle over the nomination of Alito, following the disclosure of some of Alito's highly controversial writings. Democrats said...

  • THE CASE OF THE GRADUALLY DISAPPEARING SUPREME COURT. Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;6/19/2004, Vol. 36 Issue 25, p1913 

    Comments on the possibility that the number of U.S. Supreme Court justices by 2008 could dwindle to four. Justices of the Supreme Court who will retire before 2008; Gridlock in the U.S. Senate over the confirmation of nominees to the Supreme Court; Ideological battle between Democrats and...

  • Before the Judiciary Committee.  // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2010, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p54 

    Excerpts from the question-and-answer portion of the hearings held by the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, including members such as Senators Patrick Leahy, Jeff Sessions and Herb Kohl, on the nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court on June 28-30, 2010 are presented.

  • Can the Senate Investigate the Primaries? Pro. Reed, James A. // Congressional Digest;Nov27, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p314 

    The U.S. Senate should endeavor to protect itself against the men who employ vast sums of money to corrupt the electorate of any State or of all States. The Supreme Court declared that a penal statute, when sought to be applied to a primary election in Michigan, was beyond the authority of...

  • Can the Senate Investigate the Primaries? Pro. Reed, James A. // Congressional Digest;Nov27, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p314 

    The U.S. Supreme Court declared that a penal statute, when sought to be applied to a primary election in Michigan, was beyond the authority of U.S. Congress. But the Supreme Court did not say and the Supreme Court never will say that the Senate has not the right to protect the purity of the...

  • High noon is coming to the President's judicial nominees. Sowell, Thomas // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;3/14/2005, Vol. 34 Issue 38, p26 

    Comments on the exercise of judicial power in the U.S. in 2005. Conflict between the Senate and judicial nominees; Way to stop the continuing erosion of the people's right to govern themselves.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics