TITLE

The Noncompliant Patient in Psychiatry: The Case For and Against Covert/Surreptitious Medication

AUTHOR(S)
Latha, K. S.
PUB. DATE
January 2010
SOURCE
Mens Sana Monographs;Jan2010, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p96
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Nonadherence to treatment continues to be one of psychiatry's greatest challenges. To improve adherence and thus improve the care of patients, clinicians and patients' family members sometimes resort to hiding medication in food or drink, a practice referred to as covert/ surreptitious medication. The practice of covert drug administration in food and beverages is well known in the treatment of psychiatrically ill world-wide but no prevalence rates exist. Covert medication may seem like a minor matter, but it touches on legal and ethical issues of a patient's competence, autonomy, and insight. Medicating patients without their knowledge is not justifiable solely as a shortcut for institutions or families wishing to calm a troublesome patient and thus alleviate some of the burdens of care giving. The paramount principle is ensuring the well-being of a patient who lacks the competence to give informed consent. Ethically, covert/surreptitious administration can be seen as a breach of trust by the doctor or by family members who administer the drugs. Covert medication contravenes contemporary ethical practice. Legally, treatment without consent is permissible only where common law or statute provides such authority. The practice of covert administration of medication is not specifically covered in the mental health legislation in developing countries. Many of the current dilemmas in this area have come to public attention because of two important developments in medical ethics and the law - the increasing importance accorded to respect for autonomy and loss of the parens patriae jurisdiction of the courts [parens patriae means 'parent of the country'; it permitted a court to consent or refuse treatment on behalf of an 'incapacity', or alternatively to appoint a guardian with such powers].
ACCESSION #
47654154

 

Related Articles

  • How Should Treatment Decisions Be Made for Incapacitated Patients, and Why? Shalowitz, David I.; Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth; Wendler, David // PLoS Medicine;Mar2007, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p0423 

    The article focuses on the dilemma concerning decision making for the treatment of incapacitated patients in the U.S. It notes that despite the establishment of the rights of a patient concerning medical care, many fail to determine their treatment preferences in advance leaving physicians...

  • Operational conditions: Legal capacity of a patient soldier refusing medical treatment. Kelly, Janet C // Nursing Ethics;Nov2011, Vol. 18 Issue 6, p825 

    Using a three-dimensional ethical role-specific model, this article considers the dual loyalty conflict between following military orders and professional codes of practice in an operational military environment when a patient soldier refuses life-saving medical treatment and where their legal...

  • The value of autonomy and the right to self-medication. Taylor, James Stacey // Journal of Medical Ethics;Nov2012, Vol. 38 Issue 10, p587 

    In Three Arguments Against Prescription Requirements', Jessica Flanigan argues that 'prescription drug laws violate patients' rights to self-medication' and that patients 'have rights to self-medication for the same reasons they have rights to refuse medical treatment according to the doctrine...

  • Prescription requirements: a reply to Taylor, Martin and Eyal. Flanigan, Jessica // Journal of Medical Ethics;Nov2012, Vol. 38 Issue 10, p591 

    The author discusses aspects of prescription drug requirements. She mentions her goal in revealing the inconsistency of such requirements which implicate paternalism with the value of medical autonomy. She notes her agreement on the origin of autonomy value from Kantian ethics. She also points...

  • Live and Let Die: Establishing the Legal Status of Advance Directives for Refusal of Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment, Their Enforceability, and Limitations. Leido, Juan Paolo Miguel B. // Ateneo Law Journal;Sep2012, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p491 

    The article focuses on the aspects of the advance directives of a patient for the refusal life-sustaining health treatment. It mentions that the ability of the patient to decide on his preferences to end-of-life care or right to self-determination is within the relationship between physician and...

  • Informing patients of risks inherent in treatment. Griffith, Richard; Tengnah, Cassam // British Journal of Community Nursing;Nov2009, Vol. 14 Issue 11, p487 

    Consent to treatment lies at the heart of autonomous decision making by patients who are entitled to make a free choice about whether to accept or refuse treatment. To help patients arrive at their decision district nurses must ensure that they give sufficient information about the nature and...

  • Respect for autonomy; or the right to die? Mair, Judith // Health Information Management Journal;2010, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p46 

    Recent cases have drawn attention to the issue of individual autonomy and what is sometimes referred to as 'the right to die'. Adult patients who are mentally competent have the right to refuse medical treatment even when that refusal can lead to worsening ill health and even death. This refusal...

  • Informed Consent to Treatment in Psychiatry. Neilson, Grainne; Chaimowitz, Gary; Zuckerberg, Joaquin // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry;Apr2015, Vol. 60 Issue 4, p1 

    Patients have a right to be informed and actively involved in their health care. Fundamental to a person's dignity and autonomy is the right to make decisions about their psychiatric treatment, including their right to refuse unwanted treatments, providing that the refusal is a capable one. It...

  • Physician Paternalism and Severe Disability: Strengthening Autonomy through Therapeutic Engagement.  // AMA Journal of Ethics;Jun2015, Vol. 17 Issue 6, p500 

    The article discusses physician paternalism, citing the case of former U.S. Navy Seal named Joel, who refuses antidepressant treatment and recommendations to move to a handicap-adapted home to live independently with caregivers, and three mechanisms underlying affective forecasting errors.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics