Cablevision Takes on Must-Carry

Eggerton, John
January 2010
Multichannel News;1/4/2010, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p24
The article reports on the request of Cablevision Systems Corp. to the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its appeal on the upholding of its must-carry mandate by the Federal Communications Commission in Washington D.C. It states that the company has received a stay of the Second Circuit's mandate to carry WRNN station on December 9, 2009. It notes that the split decision in federal appeals courts is one of the challenges for the Supreme Court's decision to conduct the hearing.


Related Articles

  • Court Backs FCC Ownership Caps. Holland, Bill; Sanders, Tony // Billboard;6/25/2005, Vol. 117 Issue 26, p14 

    Reports on reactions to the U.S. Supreme Court decision not to review Federal Communications Commission ownership rules on June 13, 2005. Support of critics of media consolidation for the decision; Issue of further consolidation of U.S. media companies; Comment from Newspaper Association of...

  • Supreme Court Decision Likely Ends NLC's Internet Fees Fight. Vadum, Mathew // Bond Buyer;12/7/2004, Vol. 350 Issue 32024, p5 

    The article reports that the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to deny the National League of Cities' (NLC) challenge to part of a Federal Communications Commission ruling may bring the NLC's quest to reinstate certain local franchise fees to an end. The NLC had argued that the ruling deprives...

  • Must carry survives. MARTIN, HARRY C. // Broadcast Engineering;Jul2010, Vol. 52 Issue 7, p16 

    The article reports on the decision of the Supreme Court not to hear the appeal of Cablevision System Corp. upholding a must-carry market ruling by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). The must-carry rules compel the cable companies to carry local stations in their markets for free....

  • Court punts on cable caps. McConnell, Bill // Broadcasting & Cable;02/26/2001, Vol. 131 Issue 9, p9 

    Focuses on United States (U.S.) Supreme Court's decision to uphold a 1992 law requiring the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to limit a cable company's reach. Need for AT&T to sell some of its cable systems; Size of firm's cable subscribership as of February 2001; Personnel changes...

  • Birth of Blue.  // Broadcasting & Cable;7/7/2008, Vol. 138 Issue 26, p24 

    The author reflects on the 30-year anniversary decision of the Supreme Court of the Pacifica case relative to the Federal Communications Commission indecency policy. The Pacifica, based on the late George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" routine, upheld content regulation on the grounds that...

  • The Crossownership Cloud. Albiniak, Paige // Broadcasting & Cable;9/27/2004, Vol. 134 Issue 39, p64 

    Reports on the plan of Tribune to take its crossownership case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on the Tribune case; Radio station and newspaper owned by Tribune before the implementation of the U.S. Federal Communications...

  • FCC, o for 3. Suderman, Peter // Reason;Oct2012, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p10 

    The article reports on U.S. Supreme court's decision to overturn three decisions by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on broadcast indecency on narrow due process grounds. Fox Broadcasting Co. was involved in three instances along with American Broadcasting Co. (ABC) in which the FCC...

  • Time for Court to Free Speech on TV.  // Television Week;5/4/2009, Vol. 28 Issue 12, p12 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in the fleeting expletives case between the Federal Communications Commission and Fox. The case came about when Cher and Nicole Richie said expletive words during a live broadcast on Fox stations. The Supreme Court ruled in its decision...

  • Pre-emption decision pre-empted for further review. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;6/18/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 23, p24 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to delay its ruling on whether to review a pro-state pre-emption ruling. Sprint Nextel Corp. and T-Mobile USA Inc. petitioned the high court to take the case in which the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a provision in...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics