Lessons from the Best Companies to Work For

Moskowitz, Milton
January 1985
California Management Review;Winter85, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p42
Academic Journal
What do the 100 best companies to work for in America have in common? The answer goes beyond just good pay and strong benefits, and beyond just being a successful company. Milton Moskowitz explains how and why he made his selection of the 100 Best Companies to Work For in America and offers a number of illustrations of successful corporate personnel policies.


Related Articles

  • PIECES OF THE ACTION: OWNERSHIP AND THE CHANGING EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP. Rousseau, Denise M.; Shperling, Zipi // Academy of Management Review;Oct2003, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p553 

    We develop theory specifying the role of ownership in the employment relationship and address how sharing in ownership's privileges can create convergent psychological contracts between workers and employers. We specify two factors limiting the attractiveness of ownership for some workers--that...

  • Employee Practices at the Best Managed Companies. O'Toole, James // California Management Review;Fall85, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p35 

    A defining characteristic of the best-managed companies is the high value they place on the rights and responsibilities of their employees. Specifically, they provide: stakeholders status for unions; employee stock ownership; a fair measure of job security; lifelong training; benefits tailored...

  • Happy Employees and Firm Performance: Have We Been Putting the Cart Before the Horse? Kiewitz, Christian // Academy of Management Executive;Feb2004, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p127 

    The article discusses research pertaining to employee satisfaction and firm performance. Researchers studied eight years' worth of employee attitude data, return on assets, and earnings per share from several large corporations. The study revealed a link between employee satisfaction and firm...

  • Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee "Citizenship". Bateman, Thomas S.; Organ, Dennis W. // Academy of Management Journal;Dec1983, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p587 

    A measure of a wide array of employee activities on the job was completed by employees' supervisors at two points in time; employees reported their own job satisfaction via the Job Descriptive Index. Implications of relationships much higher than typically found in the job...

  • A Longitudinal Analysis of the Antecedents of Organizational Commitment. Bateman, Thomas S.; Strasser, Stephen // Academy of Management Journal;Mar1984, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p95 

    From longitudinal data from 129 nursing department employees, organizational commitment was found to be antecedent to job satisfaction rather than an outcome of it. Furthermore, several other variables were found to be causally related to satisfaction but not commitment. Implications of...

  • Measuring staff happiness. Golding, Nick // Employee Benefits;Aug2007, p39 

    The article offers information on various methods of measuring employee engagement, including Gallup Q12. It is stated that Gallup Q12 is designed to engagement, focusing on how employees feel about their employer and whether benefit programs are in place to recognize their efforts. It is also...

  • How to measure employee engagement.  // Employee Benefits;Aug2007, p40 

    The article offers information on how to measure employee engagement through internal and external surveys. It is stated that these surveys can be used to identify the feelings of staff towards their employer and the benefits they received. Moreover, it is claimed that the surveys could also...

  • Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect as Responses to Job Dissatisfaction: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Farrell, Dan // Academy of Management Journal;Dec1983, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p596 

    This study focuses on workers' responses to job dissatisfaction. It is suggested that four theoretical categories--exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect-characterize a diverse group of more specific behaviors (e.g., turnover, absenteeism, lateness, talking to supervisor, requesting a transfer). A...

  • Substitutes for Leadership: Test of a Construct. Howell, Jon P.; Dorfman, Peter W. // Academy of Management Journal;Dec1981, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p714 

    The study reported here examined the impact of leadership substitutes on subordinate job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Leadership substitutes, as suggested by Kerr (1977), replace or "act in the place of" a specific leader behavior. Multiple regression was used to test the validity...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics