Enforcement for 'Made in Alaska' Logo Grows Federal trademark registration has convincing consequences

Hanzuk, Micheal
January 2010
Alaska Business Monthly;Jan2010, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p31
The article discusses the illegal use of the "Made in Alaska" logo that has caused problems with legitimate participants of the program. It notes that the Alaska Department of Law and Office of Economic Development (OED) reviewed the law for violation of a logo and as of September 8, 2009, the OED proceeded to pursue the federal registration of the "Made in Alaska" emblem of the "Mother bear and cub." The program will continue to offer support for marketing and promotion of Alaska-made products.


Related Articles

  • A sausage by any other name. Dunning, Matt; Greenwald, Judy; Wojcik, Joanne; Zolkos, Rodd // Business Insurance;9/12/2011, Vol. 45 Issue 35, p30 

    The article reports on the trademark infringement lawsuit filed by Jim's Original Polish in Chicago, Illinois against Jim's Original Chicago and Jim's Original of Joliet Inc., claiming that the Jim's Original logo and its slogan were copyrighted in Illinois in 2007.

  • Is Your School Logo Illegal?  // New York Times Upfront;1/10/2011, Vol. 143 Issue 8, p5 

    This article reports on the trademark violation lawsuits filed by U.S. universities against high schools for using identical logos.

  • The T-shirt logo that was once known as Shelter Island. Miller, Jeff // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);5/16/2008, Vol. 55 Issue 24, p18A 

    The author reflects on the furor over the move of businessman Ian Salvage to trademark a logo, which depicts the shape of Shelter Island, New York. Salvage uses the symbol for the clothing he sells over the Internet with the brand name The Sheltered Islander. After obtaining the trademark, he...

  • Colleges demanding schools change protected logos.  // American School Board Journal;Feb2011, Vol. 198 Issue 2, p7 

    The article reports that some colleges and universities in the U.S. contact high schools with notices of infringement on their trademarks and order them to change their logos.

  • Drawing the Line Between Descriptive and Suggestive Trademarks. HEATH, EDWARD J.; TANSKI, JOHN M. // Commercial & Business Litigation;Fall2010, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p11 

    The article discusses the several issues concerning trademark infringement in the U.S. It distinguishes between a descriptive mark and a suggestive mark in the actual legal field. It cites that the purpose of a trademark is to identify the source of a product and distinguish the product from...

  • Trademarked in Trieste. Taylor, Jonathan // Print;Feb2010, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p62 

    The article discusses the trends in trademark designs. A vivid early snapshot of food makers' designs for their new public identities is offered by an archive in Trieste, Italy. Hapsburg bureaucrats pasted in each trademark example on the registers' oversize pages. Fully produced labels...

  • Puma and jumping feline at the intersection of design and trade mark rights. Lagarde, Laetitia // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;Mar2014, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p181 

    The General Court upheld an invalidity action brought by Puma against a registered Community design (RCD) for ‘logos’ representing a ‘jumping feline’ on the basis of earlier trade mark rights owned by Puma, which constituted a prior disclosed design.

  • Snorkel decision breathes life into quasi design protection. Williams, Mark // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;Jul2014, Vol. 9 Issue 7, p543 

    A recent decision of the Australian Trade Marks Office has confirmed that composite trade marks consisting of a combination of shape and word/logo elements can be considered inherently capable of distinguishing, even when the shape has a functional purpose.

  • How to identify fine Cognac: BNIC returns to Finland. Honkasalo, Pessi // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;Sep2012, Vol. 7 Issue 9, p639 

    A trade mark for the sales denomination of a Cognac, containing the term in the vernacular, was held to convey a false impression as to the origin of the drink under Article 16(c) of Regulation 110/2008.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics