December 2009
Employers Law;Dec2009/Jan2010, p9
Trade Publication
The article reports that the decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on the case Lyons v. Mitie Security will be published in December 2009. The case focused on an employer's refusal to grant an employee's request for holiday. The EAT will decide on whether a dismissal claim may be brought and whether the employee is entitled to receive pay for such request for holiday.


Related Articles

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;Jun2008, p8 

    The article focuses on the rulings on employment-related cases in Great Britain. In Forces One Utilities versus Hatfield, the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) held that it is appropriate to strike out a response when the employer's main witness threatens the claimant at the tribunal. In Kuzel...

  • IS TUPE A SAFETY NET OR A TRICKY ACT TO FOLLOW? Cole, Kelly // People Management;1/10/2008, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p20 

    The article examines the Transfer of Undertakings (Tupe) decision on the case Power versus Regent Security Services Ltd., and its implications for employers in Great Britain. which involved an employee transferred under Tupe who had agreed to change his contractual retirement age from 60 to 65....

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2009, p8 

    This section offers news briefs on labor cases in Great Britain. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a ruling that allows a disability discrimination claim brought outside the three-month time limit. In another case, the EAT ruled that a tribunal could use its discretion to extend...

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;Mar2011, p8 

    This section presents news briefs concerning court cases involving employment regulations in Great Britain. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled in favor of the plaintiff in Bridgewater Paper Company v Hillyer and another. The EAT decided against the Royal Navy in the Ministry of Defence...

  • Put web misuse policies high on your priority list. Brahams, Gareth // Personnel Today;11/19/2002, p16 

    Discusses the ruling of the Employment Appeal Tribunal of Great Britain regarding the validity of the decision of the Hillingdon London Borough Council in London, England to dismiss an employee for accessing hard-core pornography from the internet. Factors distinguishing the misuse of computers...

  • IN FOCUS.  // Employers Law;Nov2008, p9 

    This section presents a summary of court cases related to labor and employment in Great Britain. In Autoclenz Ltd. versus Belcher, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that car valets were not employees. In Dragonfly Consultancy Limited versus The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue &...

  • A step in time saves nine. Hodgkiss, Kate // Employers Law;Dec2009/Jan2010, p18 

    The article offers tips on how employers in Great Britain should handle complaints of unfair dismissal. It states that if an employer receives a complaint from the British Employment Tribunal, it has to respond within 28 days from the date of receipt. The sources of documentary evidence are...

  • Ward Hadaway Solicitors v Love and others. Samuel, Helen; Bridges, Anna // Employers Law;Jun2010, p8 

    The article reports that the British Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a tribunal's decision stating that there was no service provision change under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 when a client transferred its work to another law firm.

  • IN BRIEF.  // Employers Law;May2011, p8 

    This section offers news briefs related to employers' law in Great Britain including the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal that compromise agreements preventing employees from bringing equal pay claims against a council are valid, a ruling that confirms that a paid volunteer is not an...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics