TITLE

Results of Coronary Bypass Grafting in Treatment of Left Main Stenosis

AUTHOR(S)
Karic, Alen; Mujanovic, Emir; Karic, Amela; Jerkic, Zoran; Bergsland, Jacob; Kabil, Emir
PUB. DATE
December 2009
SOURCE
Medicinski Arhiv;2009, Vol. 63 Issue 6, p328
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Study comparing the results of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with and without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in the treatment of left main stenosis (LMS) has not yet been made in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The main aim of this study was to compare result of CABG performed on 176 patients, in Cardiovacular clinic of University Clinical Center in Tuzla from May 1999 to January 2005, by these two methods in LMS group of patients in the early and late postoperative period. The study was divided in two parts. In the first part, early postoperative period (30 days after the surgery) has been analysed, which encompasses results of CABG in 92 patients revascularisied without CPB (OPCAB) method (Group A), and 84 patients with LMS revascularisied with CPB method (ONCAB, CCAB) (Group B). In the second part, late postoperative period (one year after surgery) has been analysed. Patients from both groups were contacted and interviewed. Total number (276 versus 278), same as average number of grafts per patients (3.0 ±1.45 versus 3,31 ±0.86 p=0.096), was insignificantly higher in group B. Perioperative and postoperative results revealed significant differences between two groups in reduced mechanical ventilation time (2.9 versus 7.3 hours, p=0.039), less blood transfusion requirement (200.3 versus 419.9 ml, p=0.035) and postoperative length of stay (7.4 versus 8.3 days). Inotrop support requirement was significantly higher in group B during the surgery (14.1% versus 29.8%, p=0.019) and postoperative period longer than 12 hours (7.6 versus 22.6%; p=0.009). Significant difference for mortality was noticed in early postoperative period in group A (0.0 versus 5.95%, p=0.023). There was no significant difference for any of additional procedures (7.9 versus 7.8, p=0.802), for major complications (8.0 versus 9.1%; p=0.985) or for mortality (7.9 versus 5.2%; p=0.692). Patients' survival after CABG for period of 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery was not statistically significant (97.0 versus 96.1%, p= 0.802; 95.5 versus 96.1%, p=0.857; 93.2 versus 94.8%, p=0.913; 92.0 versus 94.8%, p= 0.692). This study revealed that OPCAB is effective and safe method for treatment of lMS, and there are certain advantages in comparison to classical method in short term follow up, with no difference in long term results.
ACCESSION #
47436263

 

Related Articles

  • Coronary Bypass Surgery in a 105-Year-Old Patient with Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Ogus, Temucin Noyan; Erdim, Filiz; Selimoglu, Ozer; Tekiner, Fatih; Ugurlucan, Murat // Case Reports in Medicine;2010, p1 

    Coronary artery bypass grafting is one of the routine daily surgical procedures in the current era. Parallel to the increasing life expectancy, cardiac surgery is commonly performed in octogenarians. However, literature consists of only seldom reports of coronary artery bypass grafting in...

  • Revaskularizacija miokarda bez primene vantelesnog krvotoka. Milojević, P. S. // Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica;2008, Vol. 55 Issue 1, p33 

    Contemporary treatment of coronary disease includes: drug treatment, percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI), with or without stent implantation and surgical myocardial revasculanzation. For more than 30 years, conventional coronary bypass (on-pump CABO), using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB),...

  • Validation of four different risk stratification systems in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a UK multicentre analysis of 2223 patients. Al-Ruzzeh, S.; Asimakopoulos, G.; Ambler, G.; Omar, R.; Hasan, R.; Fabri, B.; El-Gamel, A.; DeSouza, A.; Zamvar, V.; Griffin, S.; Keenan, D.; Trivedi, U.; Pullan, M.; Cale, A.; Cowen, M.; Taylor, K.; Amrani, M. // Heart;Apr2003, Vol. 89 Issue 4, p432 

    Background: Various risk stratification systems have been developed in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), based mainly on patients undergoing procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass. Objective: To assess the validity and applicability of the Parsonnet score, the EuroSCORE, the American...

  • Red blood cell trauma during cardiopulmonary bypass: narrow pore filterability versus free haemoglobin. Svenmarker, Staffan; Jansson, Erica // Perfusion;Jan2000, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p33 

    Provides information on a study which investigated the influence of cardiopulmonary bypass on red blood cell (RBC) trauma in patients admitted for coronary artery bypass grafting. Details on the ability of the RBC to deform; Materials and methods used in the experiment; Results and discussion.

  • Clinical outcomes of on-pump coronary bypass using heparin-bonded circuits and reduced anti-coagulation compare favorably with off-pump approach. O'Gara, Paul J; Natarajan, Vijay; Lilly, Kevin; Husain, Ali; Shapira, Oz M; Shemin, Richard J // Perfusion;Mar2002, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p91 

    Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), or off pump, has gained popularity by avoiding the postoperative morbidity related to the use of CPB. Previously, we have demonstrated that CABG done on pump using heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits (HBC)...

  • Biological effects of off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery surgery: focus on inflammation, hemostasis and oxidative stress. Biglioli, Paolo; Cannata, Aldo; Alamanni, Francesco; Naliato, Moreno; Porqueddu, Massimo; Zanobini, Marco; Tremoli, Elena; Parolari, Alessandro // European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;Aug2003, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p260 

    Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been recognized as a cause of complex systemic inflammatory response, which significantly contributes to several adverse postoperative complications. In the last few years, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting has gained widespread diffusion as an alternative...

  • Stenting versus minimally invasive bypass. Pinkowish, Mary Desmond // Patient Care;Oct2002, Vol. 36 Issue 12, p100 

    Discusses research being done on the comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Reference to a study by A. Diegeler et al published in the 2002 issue of the "New England Journal of Medicine"; Methodology of the...

  • Long term follow up after elective percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected non-bifurcational left main stenosis: is it time to change the guidelines? Brueren B R G; Ernst J M P G; Suttorp M J; ten Berg J M; Rensing B J W M; Mast E G; Bal E T; Six A J; Plokker H W M // Heart;Nov2003, Vol. 89 Issue 11, p1336 

    BACKGROUND: According to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is contraindicated and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is preferred. However, PCI of the LMCA is...

  • CABG complication: Subclavian artery steal syndrome increases risk of ischemia, death. Eugene, Jean-Renoir; Barnes, Thomas; Tagoe, Albert; Miglietta, Maurizio; Edwards, Joseph; Schwartz, Kenneth; Nwiloh, Jonathon O.; Asche-Crowe, Pearl // Geriatrics;Sep2001, Vol. 56 Issue 9, p49 

    Presents information on a study which examined the incidence of subclavian artery steal syndrome associated with coronary artery bypass graft that employs left internal mammary artery as a bypass graft. Signs and symptoms of the syndrome; Epidemiology and representation of subclavian stenosis;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics