Educational Underachievement: Toward a Defensible Psychometric Definition

McLeod, John
May 1979
Journal of Learning Disabilities;May1979, Vol. 12 Issue 5, p42
Academic Journal
Studies the role of the distribution of test scores in the estimation of underachievement. Feasibility of the production of a quantitative definition of educational underachievement; Need for rational guidelines for the initial identification of children who are learning disabled.


Related Articles

  • Transfer of Training. Wharry, R. R.; Kirkpatrick, S. W.; Stokes, K. D. // Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly;Oct1988, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p273 

    This article discusses a test utilizing children with learning disabilities to see if gross motor training would transfer to academic skills. Children were given an academic test both before and after motor training lessons to weigh the results of both. The conclusion of the study suggests that...

  • Educational Assessment. Lieberman, Laurence M. // Journal of Learning Disabilities;Mar1982, Vol. 15 Issue 3 

    Highlights issues concerning educational assessment of learning disabled children. Assumption of automatic recognition of what and how to teach the child after determination of learning problem; Inability of educational assessment to pinpoint the cause of the problem; Choice of diagnostic tests...

  • An Outcome Study of an Early Intervention for Specific Learning Disabilities. Rothenberg, Julia Johnson // Journal of Learning Disabilities;May1990, Vol. 23 Issue 5 

    Examines the extent that learning-disabled children who participated in an task analysis intervention in kindergarten were able to maintain initial gains in academic achievement through the elementary and middle school grades. Academic achievement of most of the students eight years after the...

  • NCLB 2% Final Rule Released. Clarke, Catherine // ASHA Leader;5/29/2007, Vol. 12 Issue 7, p3 

    The article presents information on the 2 percent rule, which took effect May 9, 2007 and regulates how U.S. states assess certain students with disabilities under the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The author explains that the U.S. Department of Education's regulations allow states to...

  • Using Objective Data Sources to Enhance Teacher Judgments About Test Accommodations. Fuchs, Lynn S.; Fuchs, Douglas // Exceptional Children;Fall2000, Vol. 67 Issue 1, p67 

    Studies the use of objective data sources in enhancing teacher judgments on test accommodations of students with and without learning disabilities. Comparison of the tests given to students with learning disabilities and normal students; Key to the validity of test accommodations; Variables...

  • Computerized Practice Tests Boost Student Achievement. Cooper, Sue // T H E Journal;Sep2004, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p58 

    Focuses on the benefits of computerized practice tests to students. Background on the developments in the community of Manhattan in Illinois; Purpose of the Practice Makes Perfect Web-based tests; Advantage of the Questionmark Perception report.

  • SATS tests upset children. Coryton, Demitri // Education (14637073);5/14/2004, Issue 144, p2 

    Reports on the controversy caused by the educational test for 11 year-old students among school heads and parents in England in 2004. Statement issued by head teacher John Illingworth on the educational test; Response of the Qualifications and Assessment Authority to the complaints against the...

  • The Test That Wounds. Johnson, Katie // Educational Leadership;Feb1991, Vol. 48 Issue 5, p100 

    This article relates the author's experience administering the California Test of Basic Skills to grade 1 students. I have heard, here and there, that standardized test results are not statistically valid for children younger than second grade. I have watched a lot of children make any old mark...

  • Frequent Exams: Better Results for Students.  // Teaching Professor;Jun/Jul2007, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p4 

    The article presents the results on the study concerning students performing better with frequent exams. Two groups with one receiving more tests than the other, reveals that scores of the one with frequent tests were higher by 10 percent. Other persuasive results include the withdrawal of 10...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics