TITLE

The Economic and Statistical Significance of Stock Returns on Customer Satisfaction

AUTHOR(S)
Fornell, Claes; Mithas, Sunil; Morgeson III, Forrest V.
PUB. DATE
September 2009
SOURCE
Marketing Science;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p820
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
According to Jacobson and Mizik [Jacobson, R., N. Mizik. 2009. The financial markets and customer satisfaction: Reexamining possible financial market mispricing of customer satisfaction. Marketing Sci. 28(5) 810-819], excess stock portfolio returns for firms with strong customer satisfaction are small and statistically insignificant, and if there is any above-market performance at all, it is due to a small set of firms in the computer and Internet industries. But their data seem to suggest the opposite. The returns are actually both exceptionally large and significant. Using monthly data, their portfolio consisting of strong American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) firms outperformed the market by 0.0053, corresponding to 6.4% cumulative risk-adjusted above-market returns on an annual basis over a 10-year period--a performance that would beat at least 99% of all large-cap U.S. stock funds tracked by Morningstar. Using a different treatment of risk, their annualized risk-adjusted return is a whopping 8.4% better than market. After eliminating computer, Internet, and utility companies, they find that the monthly risk-adjusted abnormal returns drop to 0.0045, which corresponds to an annual above-market return of 5.4%. This too is better than 99% of all actively managed stock funds in the population. Yet Jacobson and Mizik conclude that these returns are not statistically significant and that there is no evidence that stock returns from firms with strong customer satisfaction outperform the market over the long run. The failure to reject the null hypothesis is probably due to a lack of statistical power in Jacobson and Mizik's analysis. We discuss why this is likely the case and then present new data updating the results from our original article [Fornell, C., S. Mithas, F. Morgeson III, M. S. Krishnan. 2006. Customer satisfaction and stock prices: High returns, low risk. J. Marketing 70(1) 3-14]. The above-market returns persist and are both economically and statistically significant.
ACCESSION #
47192285

 

Related Articles

  • Customer Satisfaction-Based Mispricing: Issues and Misconceptions. Jacobson, Robert; Mizik, Natalie // Marketing Science;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p836 

    We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the commentaries and additional analyses by Fornell et al. [Fornell, C., S. Mithas, F. V. Morgeson III. 2009a. The economic and statistical significance of stock returns on customer satisfaction. Marketing Sci. 28(5) 820-825] and Ittner et al. [Ittner,...

  • Excess volatility and the cross-section of stock returns. Wang, Yuming; Ma, Jinpeng // North American Journal of Economics & Finance;Jan2014, Vol. 27, p1 

    Highlights: [•] We complement the excess volatility literature by empirically relating excess volatility to the cross-section of stock returns. [•] Variance difference is used to quantify excess volatility, which may act as a new pricing factor for the Fama–French factor...

  • The Stock Market in the Driver's Seat! Implications for R&D and Marketing. Chakravarty, Anindita; Grewal, Rajdeep // Management Science;Sep2011, Vol. 57 Issue 9, p1595 

    The budgets for research and development (R&D) and marketing should be determined by managers to attain product market advantages. However, in response to investor expectations for short-term stock returns, managers may modify these budgets myopically to avoid unexpected short-term earnings...

  • Friend or Foe? The Role of State and Mutual Fund Ownership in the Split Share Structure Reform in China. Duchin, Ran; Levy, Moshe // Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis;Jun2010, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p623 

    Disagreement, a key factor inducing trading, has been receiving ever increasing attention in recent years. Most research has focused on disagreement about the expected returns. Several authors have shown that if the average belief coincides with the true expected return, in the portfolio context...

  • What Does the Individual Option Volatility Smirk Tell Us About Future Equity Returns? Xing, Yuhang; Zhang, Xiaoyan; Zhao, Rui // Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis;Jun2010, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p641 

    The shape of the volatility smirk has significant cross-sectional predictive power for future equity returns. Stocks exhibiting the steepest smirks in their traded options underperform stocks with the least pronounced volatility smirks in their options by 10.9% per year on a risk-adjusted basis....

  • Analyzing the Dual Long Memory in Stock Market Returns. Ural, Mert; Küçüközmen, C. Coşkun // Ege Academic Review;2011 Special Issue, Vol. 11, p19 

    The purpose of this study is to examine the dual long memory properties for five stock market returns by using joint ARFIMA-FIGARCH model and structural break test in context of weak form efficient market hypothesis. The models are estimated by using daily closing prices for S&P500, FTSE100,...

  • Affect of Leverage on Risk and Stock Returns: Evidence from Pakistani Companies. Bhatti, Afkar Majeed; Majeed, Kamran; Ijaz-ur-Rehman; Khan, Waqas Anwar // International Research Journal of Finance & Economics;2010, Issue 58, p32 

    This paper aims to investigate Affect of leverage on stock returns and systematic risk in the corporate sector of Pakistan. This study determines the relation between leverage and systematic risk. The data was collected from eight industries that are Cotton, Engineering, Chemicals, Sugar &...

  • Monetary Policy And Stock Returns: The Case Of Turkey. Sari, Ramazan; Malik, Farooq // Journal of Applied Business Research;Fall2003, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p81 

    This paper investigates how much of the variance in stock returns can be explained by monetary policy for the case of Turkey. We extend the work of Ewing (2001a) for the case of Turkey by using the newly developed generalized forecast error variance decomposition technique [Koop et al. (1996),...

  • A new critique of the traditional method for empirically estimating the returns associated with strategies of stock investment: impact of fixing the investment horizon. Samsa, Greg // Case Studies in Business, Industry & Government Statistics;2014, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p102 

    Much of the empirical literature on behavioral finance involves analyzing historical databases of stock prices. The null hypothesis in these analyses is that risk-adjusted returns are unpredictable, and the alternative hypothesis is that risk-adjusted returns are predictable in a way that is...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics