TITLE

Schumpeter versus Darwin: In re Malthus

AUTHOR(S)
Jones, Lamar B.
PUB. DATE
October 1989
SOURCE
Southern Economic Journal;Oct89, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p409
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper seeks to explore the impact of Thomas Robert Malthus upon the research conducted by Charles Robert Darwin. The justification for the undertaking stems from the perceived void in the pages of histories of economic analysis concerning the Malthus-Darwin linkage. For example, in the recently published four volume critical assessments of Thomas Robert Malthus [44] not one of the one hundred articles contains anything meaningful about the relationship of Malthus's work to Darwin's creation of evolutionary biology. Yet, among present-day historians of science, and among scientists concerned with Darwin's work, "The relationship between Darwin and Malthus is perhaps the issue in Darwin studies on which there has been most discussion and disagreement [27, 953]." Is Darwinism the product of Malthusianism? Or is it more prudent to view Malthus's contribution as a very specific one, the proportional arithmetic and nothing else? Was Malthus's role, as Mayr ultimately concluded, merely ". . . that of a crystal tossed into a saturated fluid [31, 492]?" No doubt the debate about the Malthus-Darwin linkage will continue, and remain controversial. The question, at this point, to ask is what, if anything, has been resolved? It seems certain that Schumpeter understated the importance of Malthus to Darwin, but in all fairness Schumpeter did not have available the various and important notebooks, though he did have access to everything else Darwin had written, from 1842 on. Why did he not take Darwin at his word, for certainly the references to Malthus were strong, continuous, and never out of Darwin's frame of reference about his own work? Is it as Schweber suggests, that we put our own proclivities into the issues and simply attribute to Malthus what best suits us? Schumpeter may have done just that, for his references to Malthus are quite caustic, in both the History of Economic Analysis [36, 446, 578, 581-2] and in Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy [35, 115].
ACCESSION #
4631347

 

Related Articles

  • Ecological Economics. Norgaard, Richard B. // BioScience;Apr2000, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p291 

    Explores the historic and essential linkages between economics and the physical sciences. Early work of the physiocrats, who sought to construct an economic model purely from physical principles; Economic explanations of Thomas Malthus, which influenced the biological theories of Charles Darwin...

  • 1798: Darwin and Malthus. Thomson, Keith Stewart // American Scientist;May/Jun98, Vol. 86 Issue 3, p226 

    Discusses the influential work of Thomas Robert Malthus on Charles Darwin's ideas in the field of science. Malthus' causes of poverty; List of Malthus' works; Artificial selection as a model for change; Criticisms on Malthus' ideas.

  • Natural Selection.  // National Geographic;Nov2004, Vol. 206 Issue 5, p18 

    Looks at how Charles Darwin used population theorist Thomas Malthus' ideas. Observation of Malthus that more individuals are born than can survive; Usage of this idea by Darwin, who suggested life forms must therefore compete for resources or adapt to their environments.

  • TWO WAYS TO INTERPRET THE WORLD - TH. R. MALTHUS AND „L'ABBÉ PIERRE"-. POPESCU Dan // Revista Economica; 

    Both priests, both - but in different ways- interested by human destiny especially of the poor one. There are 160 years between them. What do they have in common in the way of thinking what was the differences there? Almost nothing in common, almost everything dissimilar. What is interesting to...

  • Capitalist Contexts for Darwinian Theory: Land, Finance, Industry and Empire. Hodge, M. // Journal of the History of Biology;Fall2009, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p399 

    When socio-economic contexts are sought for Darwin’s science, it is customary to turn to the Industrial Revolution. However, important issues about the long run of England’s capitalisms can only be recognised by taking a wider view than Industrial Revolution historiographies tend...

  • On the Origin of a Theory. Conniff, Richard // Smithsonian;Jun2008, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p86 

    This article discusses the influence of the work of Alfred Russell Wallace and other natural historians and philosophers in Charles Darwin's decision to publish his account of the theory of evolution. It notes that Darwin and Wallace approached many of the same questions in their writing on...

  • Chapter 6: Malthus and Darwin: Survival of the Richest. Clark, Gregory // Farewell to Alms;2008, p112 

    Chapter 6 of the book "A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World," by Gregory Clark is presented. It looks into the ideas of Charles Darwin and Thomas Robert Malthus. It argues that there is sufficient evidence of differential survival of types in pre-industrial England from1250...

  • “A Great Complication of Circumstances” – Darwin and the Economy of Nature. Pearce, Trevor // Journal of the History of Biology;Aug2010, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p493 

    In 1749, Linnaeus presided over the dissertation “ Oeconomia Naturae,” which argued that each creature plays an important and particular role in nature’s economy. This phrase should be familiar to readers of Darwin, for he claims in the Origin that “all organic beings...

  • Charles Darwin and the Evolution of Evolution. Castonguay, Ginamarie // Social Science Docket;Winter/Spring2012, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p58 

    The article focuses on scientific influences that contributed to the discovery of biological evolution by Charles Darwin. It mentions various theories, publications, and works that helped Darwin in formulating his ideas on evolution which are reflected in his book "On the Origin of Species."...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics