TITLE

Perspectives of clinician and biomedical scientists on interdisciplinary health research

AUTHOR(S)
Laberge, Suzanne; Albert, Mathieu; Hodges, Brian D.
PUB. DATE
November 2009
SOURCE
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;11/24/2009, Vol. 181 Issue 11, p797
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Interdisciplinary health research is a priority of many funding agencies. We surveyed clinician and biomedical scientists about their views on the value and funding of interdisciplinary health research. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 31 biomedical and 30 clinician scientists. The scientists were selected from the 2000-2006 membership lists of peer-review committees of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. We investigated respondents' perspectives on the assumption that collaboration across disciplines adds value to health research. We also investigated their perspectives on funding agencies' growing support of interdisciplinary research. Results: The 61 respondents expressed a wide variety of perspectives on the value of interdisciplinary health research, ranging from full agreement (22) to complete disagreement (11) that it adds value; many presented qualified viewpoints (28). More than one-quarter viewed funding agencies' growing support of interdisciplinary research as appropriate. Most (44) felt that the level of support was unwarranted. Arguments included the belief that current support leads to the creation of artificial teams and that a top-down process of imposing interdisciplinary structures on teams constrains scientists' freedom. On both issues we found contrasting trends between the clinician and the biomedical scientists. Interpretation: Despite having some positive views about the value of interdisciplinary research, scientists, especially biomedical scientists, expressed reservations about the growing support of interdisciplinary research.
ACCESSION #
45520139

 

Related Articles

  • It's all about relationships: A qualitative study of health researchers' perspectives of conducting interdisciplinary health research. Nair, Kalpana M.; Dolovich, Lisa; Brazil, Kevin; Raina, Parminder // BMC Health Services Research;2008, Vol. 8, Special section p1 

    Background: Interdisciplinary research has been promoted as an optimal research paradigm in the health sciences, yet little is known about how researchers experience interdisciplinarity in practice. This study sought to determine how interdisciplinary research was conceptualized and...

  • The Canadian clinician-scientist training program must be reinstated. Twa, David D. W.; Squair, Jordan W.; Skinnider, Michael A.; Ji, Jennifer X. // Journal of Clinical Investigation;12/1/2015, Vol. 125 Issue 12, p4317 

    Clinical investigators within the Canadian and international communities were shocked when the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) announced that their funding for the MD/PhD program would be terminated after the 2015-2016 academic year. The program has trained Canadian...

  • Financiamiento público de la investigación en salud en cinco países de América Latina. Maceira, Daniel; Paraje, Guillermo; Aramayo, Fernando; Masi, Sergio Duarte; Sánchez, Delia // Pan American Journal of Public Health;Jun2010, Vol. 27 Issue 6, p442 

    Objectives. Describe the public subsystems of the national health research systems (SNIS) in five Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay), emphasizing the types of institutional arrangements in place in each country to promote, develop, and sustain their SNIS,...

  • A discussion with Alan Bernstein, founding president of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), on important changes. MacLeod, Stuart // Wellness Options;2006, Issue 29, p16 

    The article presents an interview with Alan Bernstein, founding president of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Bernstein discusses several changes in Canadian health research since the founding of CIHR, which include higher funding, more work in non-biomedical research, greater...

  • THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE DEFINITION OF THE ROLE OF THE HEALTH CATEGORY IN THE SYSTEM OF FACTORS OF THE LIFE'S QUALITY OF THE POPULATION. Ahmetshina, E. I.; Husnutdinova, V. Sh. // In the World of Scientific Discoveries / V Mire Nauchnykh Otkryt;2014, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p382 

    The paper presents a theoretical overview of the health's research as a factor of the population's lives quality (on the example of Republic of Tatarstan) through interdisciplinary analysis of different approaches to understanding the health category as a multi-faceted phenomenon, factor, state...

  • HEALER AND SCIENTIST.  // Annals of Internal Medicine;Mar62, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p521 

    Explores the barrier between the practicing physician and the medical scientist. Descriptive phase of medical science; Culture of medical science.

  • A meeting of minds: interdisciplinary research in the health sciences in Canada. Hall, Judith G.; Bainbridge, Lesley; Buchan, Alison; Cribb, Alastair; Drummond, Jane; Gyles, Carlton; Hicks, T. Philip; McWilliam, Carol; Paterson, Barbara; Ratner, Pamela A.; Skarakis-Doyle, Elizabeth; Solomon, Patty // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;9/26/2006, Vol. 175 Issue 7, p763 

    Brought together by the newly formed Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS), recognized national leaders in the 6 health sciences disciplines consider the environment for conducting interdisciplinary health research (IDHR) in Canada. Based on first-hand knowledge and thoughtful reflection,...

  • Challenges in conducting community-driven research created by differing ways of talking and thinking about science: a researcher's perspective. Colquhoun, Amy; Geary, Janis; Goodman, Karen J. // International Journal of Circumpolar Health;2013, Vol. 72, p1 

    Increasingly, health scientists are becoming aware that research collaborations that include community partnerships can be an effective way to broaden the scope and enhance the impact of research aimed at improving public health. Such collaborations extend the reach of academic scientists by...

  • German coalition overlooks biomedical science. Simm, Michael // Nature Medicine;Dec98, Vol. 4 Issue 12, p1348 

    Reports that the coalition treaty in Germany excludes public health, biomedical sciences and research and development. Focus of the treaty on unemployment; Developments influencing the optimism of Germany's research grant agency, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics