Communicate With Regulators To Build Trust

Kursky, Manny; Prutzman, Deborah
November 2009
American Banker;11/13/2009, Vol. 174 Issue F314, p10
Trade Publication
The article discusses how a bank can develop a trusting relationship with its examiner. Regular communications should be established, and when bad news emerges it needs to be relayed to the examiner immediately. Provide any requested information in a format that is convenient for the examiner to handle.


Related Articles

  • Get Set for Harder Compliance Exams. Ludwig, Eugene A. // American Banker;6/17/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 93, p4 

    The author opines that banks in the U.S. will become subject to stricter compliance examinations from banking regulators, and offers advice to banks on how to prepare.

  • Case Against State-Owned Banks Gains More Strength. Peters, Andy // American Banker;12/14/2012, Vol. 177 Issue F348, p1 

    The article discusses the concept of state-owned banks in the U.S. with a focus on the Bank of North Dakota. The issue of this state-owned bank paying a lower assessment fee to the North Dakota Department of Financial Institutions than the traditionally state-chartered bank is discussed. The...

  • Fed 'comfortable' with Senate GAO language. Alarkon, Walter // Hill;6/10/2010, Vol. 17 Issue 65, p20 

    The article reports on the U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's support to the Senate measure that will allow the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to held financial transaction audits of central banks.

  • ABA Study-Getting Back to Value-Added Exams.  // Pratt's Letter;5/7/2012, p4 

    The article discusses the result of the study "Value-Added Bank Supervision: A Framework for Safely Fostering Economic Growth," which revealed that bank examination during the recession has failed its intention to keep banks strong and enhanced their ability to succeed.

  • Banks Keep Mum About Stress-Test Costs, Clouding Reg Debate. Cumming, Chris // American Banker;5/19/2015, Vol. 180 Issue 76, p0 

    The article discusses the scarcity of information about exactly how much U.S. banks are spending on stress testing. Topics covered include the U.S. Federal Reserve's Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process, the launch of CCAR in 2011 to measure banks' capital adequacy should...

  • Forward-Looking Capital Assessments and the Capital Assistance Program.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2009 Q1, Special section p1 

    The article focuses on the forward-looking economic assessments of large banking institutions in the U.S. with at least $100 billion in assets initiated by the federal bank regulatory agencies on February 25, 2009. Explored in the article are certain considerations as to whether a financial...

  • Data Raises Question: Are State Regulators Too Lax? Rehm, Barbara A. // American Banker;2/2/2012, Vol. 177 Issue 18, p1 

    The article discusses a study which analyzed data from state bank examinations in the U.S. and raises the question of a gap or inconsistency between state and federal regulation. The study found federal regulatory agencies downgraded banks' supervisory ratings twice as often as state regulators...

  • Bank Examiners Are Not the Problem: Fed. Borak, Donna // American Banker;5/11/2012, Vol. 177 Issue F318, p3 

    The article reports on the views of U.S. Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke on the agency's bank examiners and bank examination process.

  • Why Banks Need to Go Beyond Basic Stress-Test Compliance. B. Kan, Ozgur // American Banker;3/10/2015, Vol. 180 Issue 36, p1 

    The author examines why banks in the U.S. need to go beyond the basic stress-test compliance as he observes that many banks regard stress testing as a regulatory compliance burden. He argues that bankers expect their investment on meeting stress-testing requirements to create value down the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics