TITLE

Legal Briefs

PUB. DATE
November 2009
SOURCE
HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law;2009, Vol. 2 Issue 11, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers news briefs related to employment law in Minnesota. The employers are required to comply with the Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act (DATWA) before the employees undergo drug and alcohol testing. The court ruled that tips from customers should be shared among the employees who worked in the same shift and not on the entire counter service employees based on the state's law.
ACCESSION #
45105639

 

Related Articles

  • In The News...  // HR Specialist: Employment Law;Sep2009, Vol. 39 Issue 9, p5 

    The article offers news briefs covering legal and regulatory issues related to employees and their employers. The U.S. Congress and the U.S. Equal Employment and Opposition Commission (EEOC) will look into tightening age-bias law. In an effort to track employment of minorities, the EEOC will ask...

  • Testing times over drug use at work. Lacey-Smith, Tracy // Personnel Today;6/16/2009, p6 

    The article presents information on the employment law in Great Britain regarding drug testing. It is stated that according to the charity Release, there has been a marked increase in employees being tested for drugs at work, and that some dismissals are being carried out as a direct result....

  • Employee Urine Testing and the Fourth Amendment. Bible, Jon D. // Labor Law Journal;Oct87, Vol. 38 Issue 10, p611 

    The article examines the implications of the Fourth Amendment for employee urine testing in the U.S. One of the most critical employment law issues to emerge in the 1980s concerns workplace-related drug use. Because of the enormous human and economic costs involved, employers in all fields have...

  • Keep your workplace drug-free without creating liability.  // HR Specialist: New Jersey Employment Law;Feb2010, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p4 

    The article discusses how to keep work environment drug-free without violating the legal rights employees. It states that it is important to create a policy that does not tolerate illegal drug use at work. It indicates that employers must conduct drug-testing legally and must administer tests...

  • 'These regulations will provide employees with the right to be informed about the business' economic situation; and informed and consulted about employment prospects'. Fanning, Sue // Motor Transport;1/20/2005, p11 

    Presents information on the European National Information and Consultation Directive, a legislation concerning employers and employees, to be introduced on April 6, 2005 in Great Britain. Category of organizations that will be affected by the regulation; Guidelines for a pre-existing...

  • Cut Down "High" Staffing Costs: Employee Drug Screening. Parker, William // Executive Housekeeping Today;Mar2005, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p4 

    The article focuses on a steadily growing number of U.S. employers implementing Drug Free Workplace policies. Drug Free Workplace policies are pretty useless unless the employer is willing to actually conduct substance abuse testing. The average five-panel drug test screens for the most commonly...

  • Protection against adverse action -- the new protections available to employees under the Fair Work Act. Gray, Andrew; Jaques, Mallesons Stephen // Keeping Good Companies (14447614);May2011, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p233 

    The article reports on the adverse action provisions of the Fair Work Act of 2009 in Australia which provide a remedy for employees to challenge employers' conduct. The provisions include workplace rights and the exercise of those rights, the freedom to associate and be involved in lawful...

  • Intoxication on and off duty and breathalyser tests. Pretorius, Leon // Finance Week;6/1/2005, special section p23 

    Discusses several cases in South Africa about the abuse of alcohol and narcotic drugs in the workplace. Proof of intoxication or being under the influence of alcohol; Dismissal of an employee as a appropriate sanction; Alcohol consumption after hours.

  • No need to accommodate 'disabled' worker who misses mandatory drug test.  // HR Specialist: Texas Employment Law;Dec2014, Vol. 9 Issue 12, p3 

    The article discusses the U.S. court case Leaumont v. City of Alexandria which deals with accommodating disabled worker who neglects mandatory drug test under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics