TITLE

Court report

PUB. DATE
October 2009
SOURCE
Medical Device Daily;10/30/2009, Vol. 13 Issue 210, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that Xenomics complained Sequenom in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding the former's testing of the Down syndrome. It furthers that such conduct led to a license agreement of Xenomics with Sequenom with the former giving up its patent rights. Xenomics called for money damages with punitive damages for up to 300 million U.S. dollars as well as the termination of the license agreement between the companies.
ACCESSION #
45004580

 

Related Articles

  • Litigation vs. Sequenom piles up after Down syndrome test delay.  // Diagnostics & Imaging Week;5/7/2009, Vol. 12 Issue 18, p3 

    The article deals with the class-action lawsuits filed against Sequenom after it decided to delay the launch of its SEQureDx Down syndrome test because of employee mishandling of research & development (R&D) test data. Glancy Binkow & Goldberg filed a class action lawsuit on May 5, 2009 on...

  • Sequenom test delay spurs plethora of lawsuits.  // Diagnostics & Imaging Week;5/14/2009, Vol. 12 Issue 19, p3 

    The article reports on the class-action lawsuits filed against Sequenom following the decision to delay the launch of its SEQureDx Down syndrome test due to employee mishandling of research and development (R&D) test data. The number of firms that have filed class-actions suits are joined by the...

  • Litigation vs. Sequenom piles up after Down syndrome test delay.  // Medical Device Daily;5/6/2009, Vol. 13 Issue 86, p3 

    The article reports on the increasing number of class-action lawsuits being filed against Sequenom in the U.S. after the company announced that the expected launch of its SEQureDx Down syndrome test has been delayed as a result of employee mishandling of research and development (R&D) test data,...

  • Consent ruled no defence against nuisance claims. Wass, Douglas // Planning (14672073);2/13/2009, Issue 1805, p11 

    The article recounts on the decision of the Court of Appeal in "Watson and Others against Croft Promo-Sport" case regarding nuisance claims in North Yorkshire, England. According to the article, the court dismissed the case for there was no category of planning permission that can affect the...

  • DeWitt Clauses: Can We Protect Purchasers Without Hurting Microsoft? Read, Anthony G. // Review of Litigation;Spring2006, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p387 

    The article explores whether DeWitt Clauses in End User License Agreements can be or should be legally enforced in the U.S. Key issues discussed include arguments from the perspective of software vendors and customers, a primer on the issuance of licenses for computer software and several...

  • Prior approval time limit dispute resolved.  // Planning (14672073);11/7/2008, Issue 1794, p19 

    The article reports on the resolved prior approval time limit dispute in Great Britain. The case was resolved after an inspector decided that the argument involving two appellants who lodged an application for building permit and argued that it could be erected without council's approval, is...

  • Intel, VIA Settle All Pending Lawsuits.  // Electronic News;4/14/2003, Vol. 49 Issue 15, pN.PAG 

    Reports that Intel Corp. and VIA Technologies Inc. have settled a series of pending patent lawsuits. Details of the cases settled; Information on the patent cross license agreement between the two companies.

  • on the record.  // Fairfield County Business Journal;1/19/2009, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p25 

    The article offers updates related to the activities of various businesses in Connecticut. It highlights several court cases in Bridgeport, Stamford and in U.S. district court. It lists commercial deeds, foreclosures and leases. Businesses which have applied licenses are cited including ACMS...

  • COMMERCIAL--ARBITRATION AGREEMENT- INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE--CLASS ACTION--INCONSISTENT RESULTS--STAY OF ARBITRATION--CALIFORNIA.  // Arbitration Journal;Sep89, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p75 

    This article presents a review on a case involving procedural issues related to arbitration actions in California. Pioneer Take Out Corporation and Bhavsar entered into a franchise licensing agreement that included a broad arbitration clause. Bhavsar also subleased its business premises from...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics