Default retirement age ruled lawful -- for now

Phillips, Lucy
October 2009
People Management;10/8/2009, Vol. 15 Issue 21, p11
The article reports on the plan of the British government to abolish the default retirement age (DRA), despite a High Court ruling that it is legal for British employers to force people to retire at 65. It was Age Concern and Help the Aged that brought the case to the High Court claiming that the DRA did not comply with age discrimination regulations. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) was also disappointed about the court ruling. Age Concern and Help the Aged is calling for the removal of DRA through the equality bill.


Related Articles

  • What's hot….  // Employers Law;Jul/Aug2009, p4 

    This section offers news briefs related to law in Great Britain. The High Court is set to handle the final stage in a three-year battle to scrap the default retirement age. There is a proposed amendment to the Equality Bill which would exempt the Armed Forces from proving that they offer equal...

  • Light at the end of the tunnel for drivers unwilling to retire.  // Truck & Driver;Dec2009, p7 

    The article reports that automobile drivers unwilling to retire at 65 will welcome the fact that a review of the default retirement age in Great Britain is being brought forward to 2010. This announcement came shortly before the High Court ruled that forced retirement at 65 was lawful, following...

  • ONE TO WATCH….  // Employers Law;Sep2007, p9 

    The article reports that the British High Court has referred the Heyday ageism case to the European Court of Justice. Questions to be determined include whether the default retirement age of 65 is allowed by the Equal Treatment Framework Directive and whether the test for justification of direct...

  • UK retirement age is justified according to European Court ruling. Brockett, James // People Management;3/12/2009, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p8 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the European Court Justice (ECJ) ruled that the retirement age of 65 in Great Britain is justified and does not breach European law. The inquiry was brought by Heyday, the membership arm of charity Age Concern, and 260 individual cases brought by...

  • KEEP UP THE MOMENTUM. Greengross, Sally // People Management;9/28/2006, Vol. 12 Issue 19, p7 

    The article discusses the implications of a law making age discrimination in employment illegal in Great Britain to be implemented on October 1, 2006. The indication of whether the new law has been successful is determining whether it generates a change in attitudes, policies and structures in...

  • Government in dock over ageist retirement clause. Thomas, Daniel // Personnel Today;7/11/2006, p4 

    The article reports that a claim against the government's forthcoming age discrimination legislation is being brought by employers in a High Court in Great Britain. Beyond the age of 65, staff will have a right to request to work, as part of the mandatory retirement age clause. However,...

  • Workplace Rights: The retirement riddle. Burd, Michael; Davies, James // Management Today;Feb2007, p8 

    The article discusses issues related to age discrimination laws of Great Britain. As per the law a person gets terminated before attaining the age of 65, regardless of his/her capabilities or performance. Heyday, a retirement organization, has challenged the legality of the retirement rules in...

  • Employers urged to audit health benefits.  // Employers Law;Jun2006, p5 

    The article reports that employers have been urged to think creatively about extending healthcare benefits for employees beyond their normal retirement age ahead of the age discrimination legislation in October 2006. Employers should carry out a comprehensive audit of employees' health benefits...

  • Abolition of retirement age is imminent. Delaney, Michael // Personnel Today;7/18/2006, p15 

    The article presents reports that abolition of retirement age in Great Britain is expected following a challenge by Heyday company seeking the British High Court to abolish a national retirement age of 65 years. Dismissal on grounds of retirement of those staff aged 65 years or over will not be...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics