TITLE

It's Time to Teach the Controversy

AUTHOR(S)
Baum, Christopher
PUB. DATE
June 2009
SOURCE
Skeptic;2009, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p42
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents the author's views regarding the teaching of creationism in the classrooms. He states that the teachers and educators must teach the real controversy about the origin and development of life based on rational, scientific and intellectual point of view and not on nonexistent idea of creation. He argues that creation science and intelligent design do not present scientific ideas because their fundamental claim is based on the influence of a supernatural entity.
ACCESSION #
44819046

 

Related Articles

  • SCIENCE VERSUS RELIGION: A FALSE DICHOTOMY? Levinson, Martin H. // ETC: A Review of General Semantics;Oct2006, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p422 

    This article presents a debate about science versus religion and whether the two studies can coexist as complementary studies. The author discusses some of the major science versus religion "conflicts," such as Galileo Galilei's trial and Charles Darwin's publications. The author points out...

  • Evolution and the brain.  // Nature;6/14/2007, Vol. 447 Issue 7146, p753 

    The article presents a perspective on pleasure or progress in the conflicts between religion and science. In this connection, the author addressed the article in the "The New York Times" which states that the aspects of evolutionary theory compatible with this truth are a welcome addition to...

  • IS THE WAR BETWEEN SCIENCE AND RELIGION OVER? Hall, Norman F.; Hall, Lucia K. B. // Humanist;May/Jun86, Vol. 46 Issue 3, p26 

    Examines the fundamental differences between science and religion that make reconciliation neither probable nor desirable. Because the two views make claims to the same intellectual territory, that of the origin of the universe and man's relationship to it, conflict is inevitable. There is a...

  • Andy Rooney and Prayer. Abbott, Serge Evangelos // Culture & Religion Review Journal;2011, Vol. 2011 Issue 1, p115 

    The article offers the author's insights regarding the things he believes in the context of religion in contrast with the things that he did not believes in the context of science, such as his idea on Christian churches, the theory of evolution, and wars.

  • RESPONSE TO JOHN C GREENE. Gottlieb, Sheldon F. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep-Dec2005, Vol. 25 Issue 5/6, p42 

    The article comments on John C. Greene's "Impressions of the Claremont Conference & Ernst Mayr" published in the September/October 2004 issue of the Reports of the National Center for Science Education. The author stresses that Greene's suggestion of giving a religious meaning to the instruction...

  • Why Evolution Is the Organizing Principle for Biology. Zimmerman, Michael // Phi Kappa Phi Forum;Spring2009, Vol. 89 Issue 1, p4 

    The article provides an explanation on why the theory of evolution formulated by scientist Charles Darwin is considered as the organizing principle for biology. It notes that Darwin's reasoning on the theory of natural selection is being adopted by biologists. It also cites the statement of...

  • SEX, FLIES & VIDEOTAPE. Arda, Halil // New Humanist;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 124 Issue 5, p16 

    The article focuses on the life and works of Harun Yahya, the world's most prominent Muslim creationist. He is also a founder of the Science Research Foundation, a publishing empire that boasts more than 60 websites dedicated to his writings. He is also offering a lucrative prize for anyone who...

  • Scientists, Evolution, Religion. SMITH, LAWRENCE M. // America;3/18/1922, Vol. 26 Issue 22, p513 

    The author reflects on the modern scientific investigation, evolution and religion. He asserts that writers in magazines are inconsistent in their treatment of religion and science. He explains the failure of the German rationalistic school of historical criticism to draw conclusion on Christian...

  • YOU ASKED FOR IT. Appleyard, Bryan // New Scientist;04/22/2000, Vol. 166 Issue 2235, p44 

    Presents the ideas of the author, a creationist, on the debate between evolutionism and creationism. Idea that wide claims may be made in evolution because many of its theories are difficult to disprove; Idea that the discoveries of science will make religion, literature, art and rhetoric obsolete.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics