TITLE

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SELECTION OF PREFERENCE MODEL FORM FOR CONTINUOUS UTILITY FUNCTIONS IN CONJOINT ANALYSIS

AUTHOR(S)
Catrin, Philippe; Punj, Girish
PUB. DATE
January 1984
SOURCE
Marketing Science;Winter84, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p73
SOURCE TYPE
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In conjoint analysis, a consumer's utility function for a continuous attribute is usually estimated using a part worth function. However, one may also use continuous functions. The purpose of the paper is to investigate through simulation the combined influence of the number of degrees of freedom, the nature of the "true" utility function and the amount of error in the data on the selection of a utility function. The focus is on functions that are known or expected to be monotone within the range of attribute levels of interest. One can then choose among linear, quadratic and part worth functions. The results show (a) that estimation procedures with monotonicity constraints should be used, and (b) that it is best to use quadratic or part worth functions rather than linear functions to minimize potential losses in predictive validity. (Preference Model; Conjoint Analysis; Constrained Utility Functions)
ACCESSION #
4473778

Related Articles

• SEEMINGLY UNRELATED REGRESSION: AN ALTERNATIVE TO TRADITIONAL BRIDGING IN CONJOINT ANALYSIS. Blunch, Niels J. // AMA Winter Educators' Conference Proceedings;2005, Vol. 16, p198

Splitting a conjoint job involving many attributes into several jobs each containing a sub-population of the original attributes is a well-known method to overcome respondent overload. In traditional bridging the conjoint job is split into two or more jobs each with a subsection of the...

• Multiattribute Judgments Under Uncertainty: A Conjoint Measurement Approach. Basu, Amiya K.; Hastak, Manoj // Advances in Consumer Research;1990, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p554

A methodology to predict product choice under uncertainty in attribute values is proposed and tested. The methodology consists of (i) estimating the multiattribute utility function of a consumer, and (ii) predicting new product evaluation based on expected utility computed using Ã¤ie estimated...

• Conjoint analysis helps in sorting out consumers' weiqhting of product attributes. Fetell, Howard A.; Hupfer, Herbert // Marketing News;1/28/77, Vol. 10 Issue 14, p10

The article focuses on conjoint analysis as a potential solution to market research problems. It is being identified as tradeoff analysis which refers to any analytical methodology used to identify the relative value to consumers of one product benefit over the other. It also helps to identify...

• Surprising Robustness of the Self-Explicated Approach to Customer Preference Structure Measurement. Srinivasan, V.; Park, Chan Su // Journal of Marketing Research (JMR);May97, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p286

The authors introduce customized conjoint analysis, which combines self-explicated preference structure measurement with full-profile conjoint analysis. The more important attributes for each respondent are identified first using the self-explicated approach. Full-profile conjoint analysis...

• How buyers fill in blanks in profiles.  // Marketing News;11/1/2004, Vol. 38 Issue 18, p26

Discusses research being done on the use of conjoint analysis as a marketing research tool to complete the missing values of a product profile. Reference to a study by Eric T. Bradlow, Teck-Hua Ho and Ye Hu et al, published in the November 2004 issue of the "Journal of Marketing Research";...

• ESTIMATING INTERACTIONS IN CONJOINT ANALYTIC TASKS: THE USE OF SEQUENTIAL DESIGNS. Gupta, Sunil // Advances in Consumer Research;1985, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p177

This paper shows how sequential designs, tailored to the responses of each subject, may be used to estimate interactions in data collected using conjoint-analytic methods. A simulation study to compare the proposed procedure versus existing methods for estimating interactions is also suggested.

• BEYOND CONJOINT MEASUREMENT: A METHOD OF PAIR WISE TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS. Johnson, Richard M. // Advances in Consumer Research;1976, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p353

This paper discusses data gathering and estimation procedures which overcome some of the problems encountered in conjoint measurement applications, and which lie on the boundary between conjoint measurement and more traditional techniques.

• Une comparaison empirique de la validitÃ© prÃ©dictive de la mÃ©thode de composition, de l'analyse conjointe et de l'analyse conjointe hybride. Meyer-Waarden, Lars; Zeitoun, Helen // Recherche et Applications en Marketing (AFM c/o ESCP-EAP);2005, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p39

In this article, the effectiveness of several preference elicitation techniques for predicting product choices on the individual level is evaluated: self-explicated (ACA4 phase I and II), traditional conjoint full profile (Bretton Clark's Conjoint Analyzer) and hybrid conjoint models (Sawtooth's...

• Conjoint models cannot live on tradeoffs alone. Ogle, Robert S. // Marketing News;9/12/86, Vol. 20 Issue 19, p22

The article focuses on the use of conjoint analysis to model consumer preference for product and service concepts. The products or services that consumers evaluate using this methodology, for the most part, are verbal descriptions that represent actual goods and services. Reasons that abstract...

Share