Schuster, Michael; Miller, Christopher S.
October 1984
Industrial & Labor Relations Review;Oct84, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p64
Academic Journal
This paper presents the results of a content analysis of 153 federal court cases in which complainants charged a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The results show that 57 percent of the cases were brought on behalf of white men in professional and managerial occupations; employers won nearly two of every three cases; women were more successful plaintiffs than men; more cases originated in the South than in any other region; and government-initiated cases succeeded more often than those initiated by individual plaintiffs.


Related Articles

  • Vague gripes about bosses aren't protected.  // HR Specialist: Ohio Employment Law;Oct2010, Vol. 4 Issue 10, p1 

    The article discusses a court case filed by 50-year-old engineering technician Gary Love against his supervisor for alleged age discrimination and retaliation. The case arose when Love failed to log his intended vacation days and took two days unscheduled off, resulting to his suspension and...

  • Plaintiff Unable to Establish Age Discrimination Claim.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Mar2008, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p10 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a U.S. Court of Appeals dismissed a plaintiff's claim alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment and Employment Retirement Income Security Act. The 58-year-old plaintiff was recommended for termination due to downsizing of company after...

  • Failure-to-Rehire Claims Begin to Plague Lawful Layoffs. Wich, Scott M. // HR Magazine;Nov2009, Vol. 54 Issue 11, p69 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that failure-to-rehire claims can haunt otherwise lawful reduction-in-force decisions. In the case Owens v. Wellmont Inc., Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center in Tennessee has employed Charlotte Owens as a...

  • U.S. Supreme Court Rules For Employers In Age Bias Case. Sclafane, Susanne // National Underwriter / P&C;7/6/2009, Vol. 113 Issue 26, p27 

    The article reports on the age discrimination lawsuit filed by Jack Gross against financial services company FBL Financial Group Inc. in the U.S. Gross was demoted from his position in the company which he alleged a discrimination of his age. The court ruled in favor of the company because it...

  • Bill would change burden of proof in ADEA, ADA cases.  // HR Specialist: Ohio Employment Law;Jun2012, Vol. 6 Issue 6, p5 

    The article reports on the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act (POWADA) which would change the burden of proof in cases under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and the U.S. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

  • Inside the Supreme Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;May2005, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p130 

    The article presents information on the status of important cases granted certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court for consideration during the October 2004 term, as of April 12, 2005. The resolved cases include: Devenpeck versus Alford; Keysejamma versus Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Roper...

  • COSTS AND AGE DISCRIMINATION.  // Accountancy;May2012, Vol. 148 Issue 1425, p63 

    This article discusses the Great Britain Employment Appeal Tribunal court case of Woodcock vs. Cumbria Primary Care Trust, which addressed the potential legality of age discrimination in cases where the actions were a proportionate means to rectifying a legitimate business concern.

  • Court: Workers Can Sue For Unintentional Age Bias. Clark, Margaret M. // HR Magazine;May2005, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p29 

    Reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in 2005 that the disparate impact theory of liability is available to employees suing under the 1967 Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Background of the disparate impact theory; Significance of the case Smith versus City of Jackson to age bias...

  • Claims of ageism may cost industry millions. Tylee, John // Campaign;8/1/2003, Issue 31, p2 

    Great Britain's advertisement industry, long regarded as the almost exclusive preserve of young people, is being warned that it could be faced with multimillion-pound compensation bills, if it continues to discriminate against older staff. Legal experts claim that many advertising agencies would...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics