Whither "Intelligent Design" Creationism?

Lerner, Lawrence S.
July 2009
Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jul/Aug2009, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p18
Academic Journal
The article discusses the historical and philosophical evolution of "intelligent design" creationism. It explores on various related concepts of creationism which have helped creationists to introduce the supernatural works into observable nature. It also talks about the biological concepts which have provided a way for more reliable analytical and heuristic models and made a purposeful change in the aspect of creationism.


Related Articles

  • Science Fiction. Scheiber, Noam // New Republic;9/5/2005, Vol. 233 Issue 10, p6 

    Discusses several ideas written about in the book "Kindly Inquisitors," by Jonathan Rauch. How the book catalogs contemporary threats to the Enlightenment tradition of seeking truth through logical or empirical discourse; Current debate over intelligent design; Thoughts on creationism.

  • How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan // Foundations of Science;Aug2010, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p227 

    In recent controversies about Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC), the principle of methodological naturalism (MN) has played an important role. In this paper, an often neglected distinction is made between two different conceptions of MN, each with its respective rationale and with a different...

  • EVOLUCIÓN: ¿UNA TEORÍA? AZNAVURIAN, AVEDIS // Ludus Vitalis;2009, Vol. 17 Issue 32, p221 

    This paper reviews the status of evolutionary and natural selection theories, based on their solidity as scientific stances. Recent analysis that confirm and discuss some of its fundaments are considered, specially those given by researchers in the biological sciences, as well as the diverse...

  • Intelligent Design: A Response. Hadley, Martin // Australasian Science;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p46 

    Comments on a Christian lobby group's arguments for the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to the teaching of evolution. Belief of the group regarding creation and the Book of Genesis; Criticisms against taking the text of Genesis literally; Advice on debating with a scientist...

  • EDITORIAL.  // Australasian Science;Jul2007, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p1 

    The author comments on the advocacy of Doctor John Ashton of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute (RACI) of intelligent design (ID). Ashton received harsh criticism from the scientific community due to his support of ID. Tas Wager of the of Creation of Ministries International accuses...

  • Clarifying Creationism: Five Common Myths. Numbers, Ronald L. // History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences;2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p129 

    The essay seeks to explain creationism and subvert five myths the author has identified concerning the subject and creationists. He first denies that creationists believe in the fixity of species and the perfect design of the world. He distinguishes between young-earth creationists and...

  • Evolution. Acomb, Deborah L. // National Journal;7/16/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 29, p2320 

    Reports on the results of two surveys conducted by Harris Interactive and "Newsweek" magazine regarding creationism and human evolution in the U.S. as of July 16, 2005. Fraction of the respondents who believed that human beings were created directly by God; Percentage of respondents who...

  • The Case Against Intelligent Design. Gold, Sarah F. // Publishers Weekly;4/28/2008, Vol. 255 Issue 17, p121 

    An interview with Brown University biologist Kenneth Miller, a leading opponent of intelligent design (ID), is presented. When asked about the central flaw in intelligent design, he says the argument is that there is a feature of a biological system that evolution could not have produced. He...

  • The Evolutionary Origins of Genetic Information. Freeland, Stephen // Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith;Dec2011, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p240 

    Any living branch of science achieves progress by testing new ideas. The results of these tests determine whether each new idea is accepted as a change to what we thought we knew, is dismissed as incorrect, or simply stagnates, owing to a lack of clear evidence. For evolutionary theory, one such...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics