TITLE

Jabs loses fight against newspapers

PUB. DATE
April 2001
SOURCE
Furniture/Today;04/30/2001, Vol. 25 Issue 33, p47
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports the court ruling over breach of joint operating agreement between The Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News in the United States. Contention on antitrust law violations; Opposition to monopolies; Demands for a restraining order on advertising rates.
ACCESSION #
4430439

 

Related Articles

  • MATSUSHITA: ITS CONSTRUCTION AND APPLICATION BY THE LOWER COURTS. DeSanti, Susan S.; Kovacic, William E. // Antitrust Law Journal;1990, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p609 

    Focuses on the Supreme Court case Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. on antitrust law in the U.S. Effects of the reversal of a court of appeals ruling on a district court order; Construction and application by the lower courts; Indication of the outcome on antitrust...

  • Judge lets news groups attend Microsoft antitrust depositions.  // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);02/01/2002, Vol. 49 Issue 5, p50A 

    Reports on the court ruling involving the antitrust case of Microsoft Inc. in the U.S. Arguments on the conduction of dispositions in a private place; Applicability of the decision on the case; Prevention of disclosure on the confidential information of companies.

  • Microsoft, EC Duke It Out.  // Electronic News;5/1/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 18, p16 

    The article reports that Microsoft Corp. and the European Commission (EC) will face off again in May 2006 in the start of a hearing regarding the 2004 antitrust ruling of the EC against Microsoft. It offers information on the Statement of Objections issued by EC in 2001. A decision held by the...

  • ECONOMIC FORMALISM IN ANTITRUST DECISIONMAKING. Shores, David F. // Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 4, p1053 

    Looks at the reliance of U.S. courts on abstract economic theory in determining economic effect on cases filed by a business enterprise against another. Comment on the court's decision on the case Continental TV, Inc. versus GTE Sylvania Inc.; Distinction between sales and consignments; Rule of...

  • ONE PIECE ATA TIME: SUCCESSIVE MONOPOLY AND TYING IN ANTITRUST. McChesney, Fred S. // Journal of Competition Law & Economics;Dec2015, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p1013 

    As highlighted by the linkLine case, litigation alleging anticompetitive price squeezes due to a defendant's successive monopoly remains the recurring feature in antitrust that it has been since Alcoa. Some decisions, notably then-Judge Breyer's Town of Concord opinion, treat the matter as one...

  • THE "EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES" TEST: IMPLICATIONS FOR FRAND COMMITMENTS FROM THE ESSENTIAL FACILITIES DOCTRINE UNDER ARTICLE 102 TFEU. ANGELOV, MARTIN // European Competition Journal;Apr2014, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p37 

    The article discusses the relationship between competition law and intellectual property regulation by citing the reference of the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) violations and license refusal in the innovation sector. Topics discussed include factors behind court decisions on...

  • Supreme Court Report. Young, Rowland L. // American Bar Association Journal;Mar1977, Vol. 63 Issue 3, p387 

    Summarizes U.S. Supreme Court rulings compiled as of March 1977. Racial discrimination resulting from official action; Proof required for treble damages in antitrust lawsuits; Miranda warnings in non-custodial settings. INSET: Noted and Filed.

  • MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION -- ANTI-TRUST.  // Arbitration Journal;Jun76, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p131 

    This article presents information on court decisions related to various industrial arbitration cases in the U.S. Where a civil complaint contained eighteen counts, the first of which was based on the Sherman and Clayton Acts, and where the remaining 17 counts sounded in tort and contract and...

  • German request for a preliminary ruling asking whether or not the obligation to identify press publications complies with the Directive on Unfair Commercial Practices – “GOOD NEWS”.  // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;Mar2013, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p245 

    This article focuses on the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. The plaintiff publishes the weekly periodical "Stuttgarter Wochenblatt" and the defendant is the publisher of the advertisement...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics