TITLE

Intention-to-Treat Analysis and Accounting for Missing Data in Orthopaedic Randomized Clinical Trials

AUTHOR(S)
Herman, Amir; Botser, Itamar Busheri; Tenenbaum, Shay; Chechick, Ahron
PUB. DATE
September 2009
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Sep2009, Vol. 91-A Issue 9, p2137
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: The intention-to-treat principle implies that all patients who are randomized in a clinical trial should be analyzed according to their original allocation. This means that patients crossing over to another treatment group and patients lost to follow-up should be included in the analysis as a part of their original group. This principle is important for preserving the randomization scheme, which is the basis for correct inference in any randomized trial. In this study, we examined the use of the intention-to-treat principle in recently published orthopaedic clinical trials. Methods: We surveyed eight leading orthopaedic journals for randomized clinical trials published between January 2005 and August 2008. We determined whether the intention-to-treat principle was implemented and, if so, how it was used in each trial. Specifically, we ascertained which methods were used to account for missing data. Results: Our search yielded 274 randomized clinical trials, and the intention-to-treat principle was used in ninety-six (35%) of them. There were significant differences among the journals with regard to the use of the intention-to-treat principle. The relative number of trials in which the principle was used increased each year. The authors adhered to the strict definition of the intention-to-treat principle in forty-five of the ninety-six studies in which it was claimed that this principle had been used. In forty-four randomized trials, patients who had been lost to follow-up were excluded from the final analysis; this practice was most notable in studies of surgical interventions. The most popular method of adjusting for missing data was the "last observation carried forward" technique. Conclusions: In most of the randomized clinical trials published in the orthopaedic literature, the investigators did not adhere to the stringent use of the intention-to-treat principle, with the most conspicuous problem being a lack of accounting for patients lost to follow-up. This omission might introduce bias to orthopaedic randomized clinical trials and their analysis.
ACCESSION #
44137367

 

Related Articles

  • Prescriptive Clinical Prediction Rules in Back Pain Research: A Systematic Review. May, Stephen; Rosedale, Richard // Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (Journal of Manual & Ma;2009, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p36 

    Prescriptive clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are a way of using a small selection of clinical findings to match patients to optimal interventions. A number of CPRs have been developed for use with back pain patients, but these have not been systematically reviewed. The purpose of this review...

  • Cascade Dafo. Sheldon, Loretta // Physical Therapy Products;Apr2007, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p48 

    The article presents the case study of a 16-year old female with hydroecephalus and muscle contractures. The girl is unable to move around and her physical therapist states that her braces is to provide positioning control. It was observed that she has circulation problems since her ankle...

  • How Do You Know It Is True? Integrity in Research and Publications. Buckwalter, Joseph A.; Tolo, Vernon T.; O'Keefe, Regis J. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;1/7/2015, Vol. 97 Issue 1, p1 

    High-quality medical care is the result of clinical decisions based upon scientific principles garnered from basic, translational, and clinical research. Information regarding the natural history of diseases and their responses to various treatments is introduced into the medical literature...

  • Osteopathic manipulative treatment in patients with low back pain. Licciardone, John // Clinical Rheumatology;Jun2011, Vol. 30 Issue 6, p871 

    No abstract available.

  • Manipulative therapy for lower extremity conditions: expansion of literature review. Wyatt, Lawrence H. // Journal of the American Chiropractic Association;Jan/Feb2009, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p14 

    The article focuses on a study regarding manipulative therapy for lower-extremity conditions, which was published in the "Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapy." The inclusion factors required that patients had undergone manipulative treatment with or without adjunctive care. A modified...

  • Oxford Handbook of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. Birkinshaw, Ian // Emergency Nurse;Dec2011, Vol. 19 Issue 8, p11 

    No abstract available.

  • HIRUR�KO LECENJE PONOVLJENIH I�CA�ENJA ZGLOBA RAMENA MINIMALNO INVAZIVNIM PREDNJEM PRISTUPOM. Ninkovic, Srdan; Stankovic, Milan; Savic, Dragan; Matijevic, Radmila; Milankov, Miroslav // Medicinski Pregled / Medical Review;2008, Vol. 61 Issue 1/2, p49 

    Shoulder joint is one of the spherical joints and one of the most movable but also the most unstable joint of locomotive apparatus. The aims of this work are to review and analyse the results of medical treatment of frontal recurrent dislocations on the shoulder with open surgery technique on...

  • How to Participate in Orthopaedic Randomized Clinical Trials. Trippel, Stephen B.; Bosse, Michael J.; Heck, David A.; Wright, James G. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Aug2007, Vol. 89-A Issue 8, p1856 

    Information about several papers discussed at the 119th Annual Meeting of the American Orthopedic Association in San Antonio, Texas is presented. It highlights randomized clinical trials as the most scientifically valid design for clinical research and widely recognized by orthopedic surgeons....

  • Reliability of medical record abstraction by non-physicians for orthopedic research. Mi, Michael Y.; Collins, Jamie E.; Lerner, Vladislav; Losina, Elena; Katz, Jeffrey N. // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2013, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: Medical record review (MRR) is one of the most commonly used research methods in clinical studies because it provides rich clinical detail. However, because MRR involves subjective interpretation of information found in the medical record, it is critically important to understand the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics