TITLE

The Value of Intraoperative Gram Stain in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

AUTHOR(S)
Morgan, Patrick M.; Sharkey, Peter; Ghanem, Elie; Parvizi, Javad; Clohisy, John C.; Burnett, R. Stephen J.; Barrack, Robert L.
PUB. DATE
September 2009
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Sep2009, Vol. 91-A Issue 9, p2124
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: The accurate preoperative diagnosis of infection is an essential component of decision-making prior to revision total knee arthroplasty. When preoperative modalities used to detect infection reveal equivocal findings, the surgeon may rely on intraoperative testing. While intraoperative Gram stains are routinely performed during revision total knee arthroplasty, their value remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records on 945 revision total knee arthroplasties performed at three university institutions to which patients were referred for total joint arthroplasty; the results of an intraoperative Gram stain were available for review in 921 cases (97.5%). Of these knees, 247 were classified as infected on the basis of (1) the presence of the same organism in two cultures; (2) growth, on solid media, of an organism as well as other objective evidence of infection; (3) histologic evidence of acute inflammation; (4) gross purulence; and/or (5) an actively draining sinus. We reviewed the results of preoperative laboratory studies, which included measurements of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein values, and white blood-cell count in 90%, 76%, and 98% of cases, respectively. Preoperative aspiration to obtain a specimen for culture and a cell count was performed routinely at one center and selectively at the other two centers, and the results were available for review in 439 (48%) of the 921 cases. Results: lntraoperative Gram staining was found to have a sensitivity of 27% and a specificity of 99.9%. The positive and negative predictive values were 98.5% and 79%, respectively. The test accuracy was 80%. Patients with a true- positive Gram stain had a significantly higher preoperative white blood-cell count, C-reactive protein level, and nucleated cell count in the aspirate when compared with patients with a false-negative Gram stain (p < 0.001). In no case did the results of the intraoperative Gram stain alter treatment. Conclusions: The intraoperative Gram stain was found to have poor sensitivity and a poor negative predictive value, and its results did not alter the treatment of any patient undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty because of a suspected infection. These data do not support the routine use of intraoperative Gram staining in revision total knee arthroplasty; instead, they suggest a much more limited role for this test. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
ACCESSION #
44137365

 

Related Articles

  • What is the significance of a positive Propionibacterium acnes culture around a joint replacement? E. Aldlyami; R. Grimer; D. Dunlop; N. O’Connell; T. Elliott // International Orthopaedics;Jun2009, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p829 

    Abstract  The purpose of this study was to show the significance of a positive Propionibacterium acnes sample around a joint replacement. Records from the microbiology laboratory data over a 3-year period were reviewed to identify patients with prosthetic joints from whom Propionibacterium...

  • Serum Interleukin-6 as a Marker of Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection. Villacis, Diego; Merriman, Jarrad A.; Yalamanchili, Raj; Omid, Reza; Itamura, John; Rick Hatch III, George F. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;1/1/2014, Vol. 96 Issue 1, p41 

    Background: Infection after shoulder arthroplasty can be a devastating complication, and subacute and chronic lowgrade infections have proven difficult to diagnose. Serum marker analyses commonly used to diagnose periprosthetic infection are often inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to...

  • Silastic flexible hinge implant arthroplasty of the great toe for hallux rigidus: A retrospective analysis. Jain, Shiv A.; Banerjee, Biren C. // Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery;2008, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p4 

    The outcomes in 65 patients with 76-silastic flexible hinge (two-stem) metatarsophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty for hallux rigidus were studied retrospectively. The mean age of patients at the time of surgery was 56 years (26-86) and mean follow-up was 6 years (2-11). Overall success rate...

  • Radial Head Fractures: Indications and Technique for Primary Arthroplasty. Madsen, Jan; Flugsrud, Gunnar // European Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery;Apr2008, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p105 

    The treatment of complex radial head fractures remains a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Novel implants and improved surgical techniques have made reconstruction of the radial head with open reduction and internal fixation possible in most cases. However, extremely comminuted radial head...

  • Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today? Lustig, Sébastien; Magnussen, Robert; Dahm, Diane; Parker, David // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;Jul2012, Vol. 20 Issue 7, p1216 

    Purpose: Patellofemoral arthroplasty remains controversial, primarily due to the high failure rates reported with early implants. Numerous case series have been published over the years detailing results of various first- and second-generation implants. The purpose of this work is to summarize...

  • Surgical Technique: The Anterosuperior Approach for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Molé, Daniel; Wein, Frank; Dézaly, Charles; Valenti, Philippe; Sirveaux, François // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Sep2011, Vol. 469 Issue 9, p2461 

    Background: The anterosuperior approach used for reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an intermediate between the transacromial approach originally proposed by Paul Grammont and the anterosuperior approach described by D. B. Mackenzie for shoulder arthroplasty. As an alternative to the deltopectoral...

  • A Complication-based Learning Curve From 200 Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasties. Kempton, Laurence; Ankerson, Elizabeth; Wiater, J. // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Sep2011, Vol. 469 Issue 9, p2496 

    Background: Reported early complication rates in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have widely varied from 0% to 75% in part due to a lack of standard inclusion criteria. In addition, it is unclear whether revision arthroplasty is associated with a higher rate of complications than primary...

  • Is Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty a Reasonable Alternative for Revision Arthroplasty? Austin, Luke; Zmistowski, Benjamin; Chang, Edward; Williams, Gerald // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Sep2011, Vol. 469 Issue 9, p2531 

    Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) improves function in selected patients with complex shoulder problems. However, we presume patient function would vary if performed primarily or for revision and would vary with other patient-specific factors. Questions/purposes: We compared (1)...

  • Secondary Patellar Resurfacing after Primary Bicondylar Knee Arthroplasty did Not Meet Patients' Expectations. Correia, João; Sieder, Marc; Kendoff, Daniel; Citak, Mustafa; Gehrke, Thorsten; Klauser, Wolfgang; Haasper, Carl // Open Orthopaedics Journal;2012, Vol. 6, p414 

    Secondary patella resurfacing is a controversial procedure which is applied in patients with anterior knee pain after a bicondylar knee arthroplasty (with unresurfaced patella). A group of 46 patients were submitted to this procedure and their satisfaction, range of motion and pain improvement...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics