A Return to At-Will Employment

Heller, Matthew
May 2001
Workforce (10928332);May2001, Vol. 80 Issue 5, p42
Provides information on the lawsuit filed by former at-will employee John Guz against Bechtel Corp. due to his wrongful termination. Move of Guz to prove his suit based on the California law that protects at-will employees; Ruling of the California Supreme Court on the case; Implications of the suit filed by Guz to the discharge of at-will employees. INSET: Ways of Assuring At-Will Clarity.


Related Articles

  • Employers score with latest decision on at-will employment. Wright, Don A. // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;10/23/2000, Issue 322685, p1 

    Reports the decision of the Supreme Court to uphold the validity of at-will statement in the Guz vs. Bechtel National case in California. Impact of decision to employees and employers; Claims of plaintiff John guz against the company; Definition of 'at-will' statement.

  • "Simple Logic" Precludes Ambiguity in Offer Letter's At Will Clause, Says California Supreme Court. Allen, Jamerson C. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court of California on the case Dore v. Arnold Worldwide, Inc. concerning the phrase at will in an offer letter. The court has ruled that the offer letter containing the phrase contained no ambiguity in its termination provisions. The...

  • Plain Meaning of Termination "At Will" To Be Decided by California Supreme Court. Valenza, D. Gregory // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q1, p1 

    The article offers information on the Supreme Court case Dore v. Arnold Worldwide LLC, filed in California. The case concerns the plain meaning of the termination at will in employment. The allegations against the company are discussed. The decision of the court in the case is explained. The...

  • The California Supreme Court Clarifies the Confusion Surrounding Employment At-Will. Kring, Kyle D. // Orange County Business Journal;10/30/2000, Vol. 23 Issue 44, p16 

    Focuses on the California Supreme Court's clarification of the confusion surrounding employment at-will. Limitations of the statutory presumption of at-will employment created by the Labor Code; Court's revisit of the issue in 'Guz v. Bechtel National'; Factors necessary to demonstrate the...

  • Is California's Supreme Court anti-employer? Faustman, David F. // San Diego Business Journal;7/08/96, Vol. 17 Issue 28, p20 

    Reports on the implications of the California Supreme Court's opinions on the notion of `at-will employment' for employers in the state. Features of the California Supreme Court's Foley decision in 1988; Profiles of Scott v. PG&E and Lazar v. Rykof Sexton.

  • California Supreme Court Decision Clarifies Standard for Defending FEHA Claims.  // San Diego Business Journal;2/18/2013, Vol. 34 Issue 7, p22 

    The article reports on the decision of California Supreme Court on the issue of whether the mixed-motive cases apply to employment discrimination claims under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).

  • Court widens window for bias claims in California. Bradford, Michael // Business Insurance;8/27/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 35, p3 

    Reports on the ruling by the California Supreme Court which widened the window for bias claims. Liability of an employer for discriminatory acts; Decision in 'Lachi Delisa Richards vs. CH2M Hill.'

  • California court rules laws on harassment don't ban coarse speech. Ceniceros, Roberto // Business Insurance;4/24/2006, Vol. 40 Issue 17, p3 

    The article reports on the California Supreme Court decision in a sexual harassment case arising from the dismissal of a writer's assistant in the television program "Friends" by Warner Brother Television Productions. According to the court, sexually coarse and vulgar language used in the show...

  • Furloughs Begin for California Employees After High Court Ruling. Saskal, Rich // Investment Dealers' Digest;8/20/2010, Vol. 76 Issue 31, p11 

    The article reports on the implementation of a three-day-per-month furlough policy by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in California, which is being litigated under the state Supreme Court.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics