TITLE

U.S. appeals court upholds verdict for GM in seat back case

AUTHOR(S)
Freedman, Eric
PUB. DATE
April 2001
SOURCE
Automotive News;4/23/2001, Vol. 75 Issue 5926, p26
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on a federal appeals court's rejection of a claim that the front seat back in a 1991 Chevrolet Camaro was defective. United States-based appellate court's decision to upheld a jury verdict in favor of General Motors and Fisher & Co.; Trucking firm J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc.'s settlement of case with Richard Spitzenberg; J.B. Hunt's claims against General Motors and Fisher & Co.
ACCESSION #
4396089

 

Related Articles

  • High court declines GM retirees' case.  // Automotive News;6/15/1998, Vol. 72 Issue 5771, p28 

    Reports on the decision of the United States Supreme Court who declined to hear a nine year old case which involves health-care coverage for retired General Motors salaried employees. Circumstances surrounding the lawsuit filed against General Motors (GM); Reactions of GM's health-care director,...

  • Judge sides with GM, dismisses Spyker lawsuit.  // Appalachian Automotive Report;Jul2013, Vol. 23 Issue 10, p9 

    The article reports on the decision of a U.S. judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Dutch car maker Spyker against General Motors Co.

  • Appeals court: GM had a right to deny franchise. Freedman, Eric // Automotive News;4/30/2007, Vol. 81 Issue 6253, p34 

    The article states that the California Court of Appeals has rejected a lawsuit against General Motors Corp. by James J. Williams Jr., owner of Miramar Truck and Auto Center Inc., whose application to acquire a Pontiac franchise failed. A three-judge panel unanimously upheld General Motors'...

  • GM prevails in Firebird design-defect suit. Freedman, Eric // Automotive News;3/26/2007, Vol. 81 Issue 6248, p34 

    The article reports that a New Jersey appeals panel has unanimously affirmed a jury verdict in favor of General Motors Corp. in a lawsuit that claimed that the T-top roof of a 1990 Pontiac Firebird had been defectively designed. The Appellate Division of the state's Superior Court refused to...

  • Ruzicka v. General Motors Corporation: Negligence, Exhaustion of Remedies, and Relief in Duty of Fair Representation Cases. Swedo, Jeffrey A. // Arbitration Journal;Jun78, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p6 

    The article focuses on the Ruzicka versus General Motors Corp. lawsuit in the United States. In this 1975 case, the Sixth Circuit Court determined that a union would violate its duty of fair representation when it handled a grievance negligently. In keeping with earlier decisions, the court...

  • Judge refuses to toss GMC franchise-award case. Freedman, Eric // Automotive News;4/21/2008, Vol. 82 Issue 6304, p34 

    The article focuses on a ruling delivered by Michael Davis, a U.S. federal judge, concerning General Motors Corp. (GMC). According to the ruling, the dealership Shakopee Chevrolet & Pontiac Inc. can pursue claims that GMC failed to fulfill its commitment to provide new vehicles and to award a...

  • Different California Courts - Same Result. Allan, John M.; Buck, Deanna M. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2003 Q2, p1 

    The article discusses the potential business impact of rulings on returns of principal on short-term investments in California. The Superior Court for Alameda County ruled in The Limited Stores Inc. versus Franchise Tax Board (FTB) that returns are not gross receipts for calculating the sales...

  • Gross v. Net…The Debate Continues in California and Arizona; California - GM Revisited. Ravid, Ossie // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q4, p1 

    The article focuses on court rulings related to the term "total sales." The issues on appeal in the case General Motors Corp. versus Franchise Tax Board include measuring the gross receipts of securities sales. An Arizona Court of Appeals ruling in Walgreen Arizona Drug Co. versus Arizona...

  • J.B. hunt drops auto hauling division.  // Overdrive;May96, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p86 

    Reports on J.B. Hunt's elimination of its J.B. Autotrack division. Special charge leading to a $6.8 million loss in the fourth quarter of 1995.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics