TITLE

Endovascular Versus Open Management of Blunt Traumatic Aortic Disruption at Two Military Trauma Centers: Comparison of In-Hospital Variables

AUTHOR(S)
Kauvar, David S.; White, Joseph M.; Johnson, Chatt A.; Jones, W. Tracey; Rasmussen, Todd E.; Clouse, W. Darrin
PUB. DATE
August 2009
SOURCE
Military Medicine;Aug2009, Vol. 174 Issue 8, p869
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Blunt traumatic aortic disruption (BTAD) carries significant mortality and morbidity. Traditional open repair has appreciable risks of perioperative mortality and spinal cord ischemic complications. Endovascular repair may reduce the incidence of these adverse outcomes. We present the experience at two military trauma centers with thoracic aortic endografting for trauma (TAET) and compare this with recent open experience. Methods: A review of inpatient records was performed. All patients undergoing open repair or TAET for acute BTAD were studied. Collected data included demographics, injury characteristics, and in-hospital variables. Descriptive statistics were calculated with two-tailed t-tests performed for comparison of continuous variables. Results: Five open and eight TAET repairs were performed. Mean age was 32 years (range 28-50) in the TAET group and 35 (25-57) in the open group. All patients, except one TAET, had at least one associated injury with thoracic injuries predominating. Twelve BTAD were just distal to the left subclavian artery. One injury, treated with TAET, was just proximal to the celiac. Operative blood loss averaged 298 ± 394 mL in the TAET group vs. 2,400 ± 3,800 mL in the open group (p = 0.18). Crystalloid infusions were similarly reduced in TAET patients, 1,019 ± 532 mL vs. 4,860 ± 1,547 mL, p < 0.05), as were red blood cell transfusions, 1.6 units vs. 5.0 units (p = 0.12). The majority of patients [6/8 (75%) TAET, 5/5 (100%) open] experienced an inpatient complication (p = 0.09). All open patients had at least one infectious complication. There were no inpatient deaths related to aortic injury or spinal cord ischemic complications. Conclusions: TAET is feasible for the treatment of BTAD in military trauma centers. It is important for military centers to accomplish this with adequate results as endovascular technologies are now being taken to the battlefield. Decreased blood loss and resuscitation requirements compared to open repair are likely contributors to improved outcomes with TAET.
ACCESSION #
43931845

 

Related Articles

  • Improbable Survival after Prolonged Traumatic Cardiopulmonary Arrest: Revisiting the 15-minute Rule. Kim, Tad; Kim, Sara S.; Lottenberg, Lawrence; Efron, Philip A.; Ang, Darwin N. // American Surgeon;Jun2013, Vol. 79 Issue 6, p649 

    The article describes a case of improbable survival in a 19-year-old man who sustained blunt traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest and underwent prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after experiencing a motor vehicle collision. The patient experienced additional episodes of cardiac arrest...

  • Trauma in 2012. Salm, L.; Hommers, C. E. // Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation & Emergency Medici;2013, Vol. 21 Issue Suppl 1, p1 

    Information about several lectures on trauma management in the civilian and military setting at the London Trauma Conference held in London, England is presented. Orthopaedic surgeon Mark Rickman covered the subject of severe pelvice trauma. Orthopedic surgeon consultant Jon Kendrew outlined the...

  • Nonoperative Management of Solid Abnominal Organ Injuries from Blunt Trauma: Impact of Neurologic Impairment. Shapiro, Michael B.; Hoff, William S.; Kauder, Donald R.; Schwab, C. William; Nance, Michael L.; Schiller, Henry J. // American Surgeon;Aug2001, Vol. 67 Issue 8, p793 

    The role of nonoperative management of solid abdominal organ injury from blunt trauma in neurologically impaired patients has been questioned. A statewide trauma registry was reviewed from January 1993 through December 1995 for all adult (age >12 years) patients with blunt trauma and an...

  • How CPR can save a child's life.  // Current Health 1;Dec92, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p20 

    Explains how to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on infants (under age one) and children (ages one through eight years). How to check responsiveness, call for help and position the victim; Opening the airway; How to check breathing and give two breaths; Emergency Medical Service...

  • Do you know these new emergency protocols? Moore, Kathleen // RN;Nov92, Vol. 55 Issue 11, p34 

    Presents revisions in the American Heart Association's Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac Care, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in October, 1992. Emergency measures; Using ventilation masks; Protocol for IV adenosine and IV...

  • IF YOU HAVE A HEART ATTACK, HOPE YOU'RE IN SEATTLE. Rylko, C. // Saturday Evening Post;Apr88, Vol. 260 Issue 3, p56 

    The remarkable survival rate of people with sudden cardiac arrest in the city of Seattle, WA, is due to a combination of CPR-trained citizens and a fast emergency-care system.

  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Niemann, James T.; Desforges, Jane F. // New England Journal of Medicine;10/8/92, Vol. 327 Issue 15, p1075 

    Presents an overview of cardiopulmonary arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Causes of cardiopulmonary arrest; Diagnosis of cardiopulmonary arrest; Artificial circulation and chest compressions; Work of Kouwenhoven, et al, in 1960; Endotracheal intubation; Advanced cardiac life...

  • Know when to stop advanced life support for cardiac arrest victims.  // Modern Medicine;Mar94, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p57 

    Presents abstracts of the articles entitled `Predicting the Outcome of Unsuccessful Pre-Hospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support,' by A.L. Kellermana, et al, `Distinct Criteria for Termination of Resuscitation in the Out-of-Hospital Setting,' by M.J. Bonnin, et al, and `Prehospital Resuscitation:...

  • New for CPR.  // Better Homes & Gardens;Feb1993, Vol. 71 Issue 2, p84 

    Reports on new advice from a national study group that recommends calling an emergency number before beginning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on a heart attack victim. Where the new recommendation does not apply; Why this change was made; Other change in adult CPR.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics