TITLE

A critical appraisal of epidemiological studies comes from basic knowledge: a reader's guide to assess potential for biases

PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
World Journal of Emergency Surgery;2007, Vol. 2, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
43835859

 

Related Articles

  • How to assess epidemiological studies. Zaccai J H // Postgraduate Medical Journal;Mar2004, Vol. 80 Issue 941, p140 

    Assessing the quality of an epidemiological study equates to assessing whether the inferences drawn from it are warranted when account is taken of the methods, the representativeness of the study sample, and the nature of the population from which it is drawn. Bias, confounding, and chance can...

  • How to assess epidemiological studies. Zaccai J H // Postgraduate Medical Journal;Mar2004, Vol. 80 Issue 941, p140 

    Assessing the quality of an epidemiological study equates to assessing whether the inferences drawn from it are warranted when account is taken of the methods, the representativeness of the study sample, and the nature of the population from which it is drawn. Bias, confounding, and chance can...

  • How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study. Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal; Egan, Matt; Petticrew, Mark // Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health;Feb2015, Vol. 69 Issue 2, p189 

    Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) are expected to critically appraise included studies and privilege those at lowest risk of bias (RoB) in the synthesis. This study examines if and how critical appraisals inform the synthesis and interpretation of evidence in SRs. Methods: All SRs published...

  • Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Simon Sanderson; Iain D Tatt; Julian PT Higgins // International Journal of Epidemiology;Jun2007, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p666 

    Background Assessing quality and susceptibility to bias is essential when interpreting primary research and conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Tools for assessing quality in clinical trials are well-described but much less attention has been given to similar tools for observational...

  • Epidemiologic studies of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease and ETS... Thun, Michael; Henley, Jane; Apicella, Louis // Environmental Health Perspectives Supplements;Dec99 Supplement 6, Vol. 107, p841 

    Focuses on the epidemiologic studies of the links between ischemic heart disease risk and environmental tobacco smoke exposure from a spouse who smokes. Description of the epidemiologic studies; Criticism of the epidemiologic studies; Publication bias; Confounding; Misclassification of exposure.

  • A practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: IV. Brignardello-Petersen, Romina; Carrasco-Labra, Alonso; Glick, Michael; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Azarpazhooh, Amir // Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA);Feb2015, Vol. 146 Issue 2, p94 

    Background and Overview. Questions regarding harm are common in dental practice. Observational, nonrandomized studies (that is, cohort studies and case-control studies) are the designs used by investigators to answer most of these questions. A critical appraisal of these studies should include...

  • New Epidemiologic Evidence Confirming That Bias Does Not Explain the Aspirin/Reye's Syndrome Association. Forsyth, Brian W.; Horwitz, Ralph I.; Acampora, Denise; Shapiro, Eugene D.; Viscoli, Catherine M.; Feinstein, Alvan R.; Henner, Rochelle; Holabird, Nancy B.; Jones, Beth A.; Karabelas, Artemis D.E.; Kramer, Michael S.; Miclette, Michelle; Wells, James A. // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;5/5/89, Vol. 261 Issue 17, p2517 

    Presents a study which developed an epidemiologic investigation to determine the validity of the aspirin/Reye's syndrome association and assess the effects of five potential sources of bias. Sources of potential bias and methodological strategies; Biased diagnosis and reporting of Reye's...

  • Observational data: Understanding the real MS world. Kalincik, Tomas; Butzkueven, Helmut // Multiple Sclerosis Journal;Nov2016, Vol. 22 Issue 13, p1642 

    Randomised clinical trials are the primary source of evidence, guiding the use of disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis. However, the spectrum of questions that can be answered in the trial setting is relatively narrow. ‘Real-world’ observational data analysis has always...

  • Assessing waterborne risks: an introduction. Craun, Gunther F.; Calderon, Rebecca L.; Wade, Timothy J. // Journal of Water & Health;Jun2006, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p3 

    Information in this paper can help readers evaluate the results of epidemiologic studies of waterborne disease risks. It is important that readers understand the various epidemiologic study designs, their strengths and limitations, and potential biases. Terminology used by epidemiologists to...

  • Critical appraisal of epidemiological studies and clinical trials. Martinez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel // Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health;Mar2008, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p279 

    The article reviews the book "Critical Appraisal of Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials," edited by Mark Elwood.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics