TITLE

Court Ordered Listings: Center for Biological Diversity v. Fish and Game Commission

AUTHOR(S)
Cheng, Jessica
PUB. DATE
May 2009
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2009, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p569
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the case of the Center for Biological Diversity versus Fish and Game Commission in the U.S. The case involved the listing of the California Tiger Salamander as a candidate species as ordered by the state Court of Appeal. The California Endangered Species Act required that the Commission list a species as endangered when it is in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout all, or a significant portion, of its range.
ACCESSION #
43800542

 

Related Articles

  • Who Can Enforce the Endangered Species Act's Command for Federal Agencies to Carry Out Conservation Programs? Gersen, Sara // Ecology Law Quarterly;2009, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p407 

    In Florida Key Deer v. Paulison, the Eleventh Circuit held that federal agencies cannot meet the Endangered Species Act's (ESA's) command to "carry[] out programs for the conservation of endangered species" with programs of "insignificant effect. "Since the enactment of the ESA, courts have...

  • US wildlife stance remains firm. Vesely, Milan // African Business;Feb99, Issue 240, p23 

    Reveals that the United States government stance on wildlife conservation programs in Africa remains unchanged. Commitment of the Clinton administration to wildlife conservation projects in Africa; Budget allotted for the projects for 1999; Animals that are listed as endangered.

  • QUANTIFYING, MONITORING, AND TRACKING "TAKE" UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: THE PROMISE OF A MORE INFORMED APPROACH TO CONSULTATION. Totoiu, Jason // Environmental Law (00462276);Winter2011, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p165 

    This Article explores recent court rulings concerning how the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service (Services) specify the level of "take" anticipated in their formal consultation decisions and how these rulings provide a much needed impetus and incentive...

  • A good deal for wolves--or for the hunters?  // Time International (South Pacific Edition);7/27/1998, Issue 30, p16 

    Mentions the objections of conservationists to removal of gray wolves of Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin from the United States' Endangered Species List. Suggestion that the jump from endangered to game status is too great a one to make; Comments from conservationist Carlyn Berg of Minnesota.

  • Landowners kill rare species in self-defence.  // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;10/13/97, Vol. 24 Issue 44, p20 

    Examines the negative aspects of legislation intended to protect endangered species. Details from a report issued by the Canadian Property Rights Research Institute, based in Calgary, Alberta; The various responses of landowners in the United States to the Endangered Species Act; Combative...

  • The life of a threatened species officer. Price, Catherine // Australian Zoologist;Dec2008, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p544 

    The article focuses on the life of a threatened species officer within the Department of Environment and Climate Change in New South Wales. It discusses the practical implications of policy development on the agency. It is stated that the endangered species conservation requires knowledge of...

  • Canada aims to ease whale protection as pipeline decision looms.  // World Energy News;4/23/2014, p3 

    The article reports on the plan of the Canadian government to ease the protection of humpback whales. It states that the government suggests removing humpback whales from the list of threatened species, two month prior to making decision on whether it will approve a pipeline that will lead...

  • News from the States. Asimow, Michael // Administrative & Regulatory Law News;Summer2011, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p27 

    The article presents legal news and developments. The California Court of Appeals, in Rogel v. Lynwood Redevelopment Agency rejected the reasoning for a negative multiplier as multipliers are intended for the determination of the value of the services of the attorneys, and not for the protection...

  • Member Knowingly Exceeded Construction Height Guidelines.  // Community Association Management Insider;Apr2010, Vol. 9 Issue 11, p7 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the association's architectural committee sued its member for exceeding the height guidelines in home building which was supported by the California Court of Appeals as the height guideline's adoption by the association served as evidence.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics