TITLE

Risky Business: Barriers to Rationality in Congress

AUTHOR(S)
Jones, Rachel R.
PUB. DATE
May 2009
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2009, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p467
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In Defenders of Wildlife v. Chertoff, the D.C. District Court upheld the constitutionality of an extraordinarily broad waiver provision in the REAL I.D. Act of 2005. That provision, section 102, allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive all laws he deems necessary to ensure expeditious construction of border fencing along the United States-Mexico border. While Defenders of Wildlife confirms the legality of waiver provisions like section 102, it also raises the interesting question of what drives legislative decision- making in the face of uncertainty. Behavioral science research shows that in the post-9/1 1 world, our ability to objectively perceive risk is altered by our knowledge of terrorist attacks and by our exposure to media coverage of the terrorist threat the United States faces. This diminished ability to objectively perceive risk can negatively affect the deliberative process when Congress must legislate around uncertain risks, like the risk of environmental harm and the risk of future terrorist attacks. I consider several options that might minimize the effect of this phenomenon on the crafting of legislation, including the creation of a standing risk assessment council, the inclusion of traditional waiver provision elements that limit the effects of potentially irrational legislative behavior, and drafting legislation that requires waiver-invoking officials to accurately characterize the risks to be considered.
ACCESSION #
43800537

 

Related Articles

  • Incorporation Doesn't Guarantee Exclusive Use of Name.  // Nonprofit World;Sep/Oct2007, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p7 

    The article reports on the ruling of the District of Columbia Appeals Court regarding the case of using the corporate name by the act of incorporation. The court ruled that the act of incorporation does not give an organization the exclusive right to use the corporate name. It started when a...

  • Court confirms $10,000 limit on surety claims.  // Commercial Carrier Journal;Aug2010, Vol. 167 Issue 8, p39 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed that an insurance company's liability under a 10,000-dollars surety bond provided to freight broker Sam's Transportation is limited at a total of 10,000-dollars and not at...

  • POLITICAL QUESTION.  // International Law Update;Apr2008, Vol. 14, p65 

    The article discusses a case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided whether common law claims by the widow of a Guatemalan rebel fighter allegedly killed with the support of government officials involve political questions or fall within the Federal Tort...

  • Are All NLRB Rulings Since Early Last Year Invalid? Mont, Joe // Compliance Week;Jun2013, Vol. 10 Issue 113, p22 

    The article reports on the concerns of several companies regarding the validity of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rulings since January 2012. The controversy emerged after some people criticized the move of President Barack Obama to name three members to the board by recess...

  • Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak and Salazar v. Patchak (Docket No. 11-246 and 11-247 Consolidated).  // Federal Lawyer;Aug2012, Vol. 59 Issue 7, p61 

    The article discusses the decision delivered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak and Salazar v. Patchak cases.

  • Traveling Contractor's Clause Valid.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Jun2007, Vol. 41 Issue 6, p11 

    The article discusses the court case Flynn et al. v. Dick Corp., decided on March 20, 2007. The defendant was sued by the pension plan for failing to pay for employee contributions as required under the collective bargaining agreements (CBA). The traveling contractor's clause in a CBA was...

  • Court To NRC: Time To Decide On Yucca Mountain. LOBSENZ, GEORGE // Energy Daily;7/6/2011, Issue 127, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on July 1, 2011 to reject a lawsuit that challenges the abandonment of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository by the administration of President Barack Obama. The judges pointed out that...

  • Court rejects industry's challenge to MSHA diesel particulate rule. Smith, Ellen; Aclander, Melanie // Pit & Quarry;Apr2007, Vol. 99 Issue 10, p68 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to reject the proposal to review the Mine Safety and Health Administration's (MSHA) rules regulation miner's exposure to diesel particulate matter. Filed by a coalition of metal and nonmetal mine...

  • D.C. Circuit rules checkpoints unconstitutional. Parker, Andy // Guild Notes;Summer2009, Vol. 34 Issue 2/3, p6 

    The article focuses on the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit in resolution to the police seizure and interrogation checkpoint program implemented in Washington, D.C., in 2008. The Court issued a decision on July 10, 2009 declaring the program to be...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics