TITLE

Taking a Hard Look at Agency Science: Can the Courts Ever Succeed?

AUTHOR(S)
Clark, Sara A.
PUB. DATE
May 2009
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2009, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p317
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In managing the nation's forests, the Forest Service relies on complex scientific information to make decisions about timber harvesting, wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, and other activities. Courts have struggled to find the proper level of deference owed to the agency in making such decisions, in part because of the difficulties that science poses to the court. Judges are hesitant to overrule decisions based on the perceived scientific expertise of administrative agencies. However, the Forest Service faces constraints in its structure, mission, and culture that tend to bias agency decision making toward resource extraction. In Lands Council v. McNair, an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit forcefully returns the court to a highly deferential standard of review. This Note argues that this highly deferential standard may encourage the Forest Service to engage in a "science charade," where the agency disguises policy judgments as scientific decisions, in order to avoid both stringent judicial review and political accountability. Such a charade has negative implications for the agency, the courts, the environment, and the public has a whole.
ACCESSION #
43800532

 

Related Articles

  • BLAST FROM THE PAST... 1974.  // Wood & Wood Products;Jun2008, Vol. 113 Issue 7, p162 

    The article reports on the judgment on the lawsuit filed against the U.S. Forest Service. The case takes advantage of imprecise wording in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in an attempt to provide preservationists with a formidable new weapon. A declaratory judgment says that the...

  • In the Courts.  // Environmental Law Reporter: News & Analysis;Feb2016, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p10162 

    The article focuses on recent cases related to the environmental issues from the U.S. A court has dismissed a lawsuit filed against the State Department in connection with two upgrade projects for a major oil sands pipeline. The Tenth Circuit reversed a lower court decision holding the seller of...

  • Iudex non Calculat? Biard, Alexandre // European Journal of Risk Regulation;2015, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p597 

    Mass harm situations caused by corporate misbehaviour, defective products, harmful pharmaceuticals, accidents or environmental disasters nowadays multiply and create new challenges for legal actors and society at large. In its 2013 Recommendations, the EU Commission highlighted that 'a key role...

  • Case explores relevance of alternative site search. Creer, Kate // Planning (14672073);9/26/2008, Issue 1788, p11 

    The article presents the court case South Cambridgeshire District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government in Great Britain. The case deals with the relation in determining planning applications and the clear advise on the scope for challenging decisions under section...

  • Terminations for Convenience. Norris, Michael L. // Army Lawyer;Jan2007, Issue 404, p98 

    The article discusses the decision of the Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals (AGBCA) regarding the case of Ardco Inc. versus the U.S. Forest Service, stating that a contractor can recover anticipatory profits for work it would have been given under an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity...

  • Search and Seizure Cases in the Supreme Court of Canada: Extending an American Model of Judicial Decision Making across Countries. Wetstein, Matthew E.; Ostberg, C.L. // Social Science Quarterly (University of Texas Press);Dec99, Vol. 80 Issue 4, p757 

    The article examines the validity of the United States bounded rationality theory of judicial decision-making in the Canadian Supreme Court. Since the mid-1980s, scholars have contended that judicial decision making on the U.S. Supreme Court in search and seizure cases is influenced by factual...

  • Can Teams be Mismatched? A Legal Issue.  // Journal of Sport Management;Jul1990, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p187 

    The article presents court case of Benitz v. New York City Board of Education, which discusses the award to plaintiff who got his neck broken in a football game. In the subsequent lawsuit, the plaintiff's lawyer claimed that permitting the mismatched game to be played and allowing Benitz to play...

  • Business: Case of the quarter.  // Lawyer 2B;5/28/2013, p5 

    The article focuses on two supreme court case including Futter and Anor (Appellants) vs. The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs (Respondent); Pitt & Anor (Appellants) vs. The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs (Respondent). It states that in both cases, trustees appealed against a...

  • Court's Hindsight Offers Lesson in Perfect Vision. Feldman, Robert A. // Corporate Legal Times;Oct2004, Vol. 14 Issue 155, p8 

    The article presents a court case to explain the importance of perfect vision in making decisions. The dispute was between healthcare providers and suppliers and insurers of a health plan. The contract between them contained "all terms and conditions" of which the provider took the use to make...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics