TITLE

Environmental Conservation Organization v. City of Dallas Creates Unnecessary Burdens for Citizen Suits under the Clean Water Act

AUTHOR(S)
Mongeon, Catherine
PUB. DATE
May 2009
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2009, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p237
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In Environmental Conservation Organization v. City of Dallas, the Fifth Circuit creates obstacles for environmental citizen suits by imposing a "realistic prospect" standard for the mootness test. The realistic prospect standard shifts the burden of proof in a mootness test from the defendant to the citizen group filing suit, requiring the citizen group to prove that there is a "realistic prospect" that a defendant will continue to violate the statute in question. This Note argues that the Fifth Circuit erred in its decision to impose the "realistic prospect" standard and also in its application of the standard to the facts of that case. This Note concludes that the Fifth Circuit's decision exacerbates existing ambiguity in the Clean Water Act's citizen suit provision and could ultimately undermine the utility of citizen suits as supplemental enforcement mechanisms within the field of environmental law.
ACCESSION #
43800530

 

Related Articles

  • Non-compete Covenant Upheld. Gold, Lessing E. // SDM: Security Distributing & Marketing;Jun2007 Part 1 of 2, Vol. 37 Issue 6, p34 

    The article offers information about the recently ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th District, which granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant who was the vice president of a corporation in Louisiana. The ruling arises due to invalid non-competition clause under...

  • Plaintiff Is Not Entitled to Benefits From His SERP.  // Benefits Magazine;May2014, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p57 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has affirmed the district court's decision holding that a pharmaceutical company and its benefit plans did not act arbitrarily and capriciously. The court have not agreed with the plaintiff's argument stating in response...

  • Fifth Circuit Holds Ordinary Course of Business Exception Requires Evidence of Similar Practices Within the Industry. Johnson, Craig E. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q4, p1 

    The article focuses on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on the Gulf City Seafoods Inc. v. Ludwig Shrimp Co. case. The court of appeals held that a creditor who seeks to employ the ordinary course of business exception to defeat a preference claim under Section 547 of...

  • When a Vendetta Is Not Vindictive: The Fifth Circuit Narrowly Defines Prosecutorial Vindictiveness in Jordan v. Epps. Sharer, Janelle E. // Tulane Law Review;Mar2015, Vol. 89 Issue 4, p985 

    The article discusses the U.S Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's decision in case Jordan v. Epps that addressed prosecutorial vindictiveness. Topics discussed include the U.S Supreme Court addressed prosecutorial vindictiveness in case Blackledge v. Perry, in which defendant convicted of a...

  • Court Affirms District Court's Dismissal of Claims.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Sep2008, Vol. 42 Issue 9, p12 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the judgment of a district court dismissing the plaintiffs' claims challenging their nonparticipation in the defendant company's pension plans. In Harris et al. v. Trustmark National Bank et al.,...

  • Dealer Claims Casino Violated Title VII. Welfley, Jennifer Ann // HR Magazine;Jan2006, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p102 

    The article reports on the decision of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the case Jones v. Robinson Property Group. The court decided that witness accounts of a manager's racial epithets constitute sufficient direct evidence of race discrimination to defeat a summary judgment motion....

  • Harassment Claim Advances. Thiel, Jennifer M. // HR Magazine;Oct2008, Vol. 53 Issue 10, p99 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a former Wal-Mart employee filed a sexual harassment suit against her supervisor. According to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, she may proceed with her harassment claim based on the conduct of her supervisor but she failed to show that she was...

  • Plaintiffs Entitled to Continue Their Action in Federal Court.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Feb2008, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p2 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirms the decision of the district court to deny the plaintiff the motion to remand but reverses the district court's ruling to dismiss the complaint against the defendant company Kimberly-Clark. The Appeals Court sided...

  • Former Employees Can Release FMLA Claims for Retaliation, Fifth Circuit Rules. Lowrie, John C.; Munger, Peter F. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2003 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the waiver of rights of employees under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) in the case Faris v. Williams WPC-1, Inc. The FMLA did not invalidate a former employee's release of her claim for monetary damages under the FMLA. Faris sued her employer claiming that the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics