July 2009
SN: Supermarket News;7/20/2009, Vol. 57 Issue 29, p6
The article reports that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has settled a class-action discrimination lawsuit for $17.5 million. A federal judge in Little Rock, Arkinsas, has approved a $17.5 million settlement of the lawsuit against Wal-Mart. The lawsuit charged that Wal-Mart turned away black applicants for truck-driving positions.


Related Articles

  • What You Need to Know about Wal-Mart v. Dukes. Harvey, Stephen G.; Stio III, Angelo A. // CADS Report;Summer2011, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p5 

    The article discusses the 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes. Despite of the involvement of 1.5 million female Wal-Mart employees in the case, the Court decided that it could not be certified as a class action lawsuit. According to the plaintiffs, the firm allegedly...

  • Court certifies class of brokers claiming race discrimination. Kozubek, Michael // InsideCounsel;May2012, Vol. 23 Issue 245, p68 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Supreme Court denied 1.5 million female employees alleging sex discrimination a class certification. It states that the ruling was made based on the findings that the company empowered local managers to decide on their staff's pay and promotion,...

  • Walmart lawsuit headed to Supreme Court. Sherman, Mark // Buffalo Law Journal;3/31/2011, Vol. 83 Issue 26, p1 

    The article discusses a court case involving retailer Wal-Mart Stores Inc. which has been sued on the grounds of employee gender discrimination by a class of women plaintiffs in the U.S. It states that the class action, which will be headed to the Supreme Court, has contended that women are...

  • Beyond Good and Evil in Civil Rights Law: The Case of Wal-Mart v. Dukes. Ford, Richard Thompson // Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law;2011, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p513 

    The article focuses on the U.S. civil rights law. It discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case WAL-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes. In this case, the plaintiffs focused their litigation on individualized claims based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and other anti-discrimination laws. It presents...

  • Supreme Court Hears Wal-Mart Bias Appeal.  // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;3/30/2011, Vol. 201 Issue 65, p2 

    The article discusses a court case filed against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. for gender discrimination by a small group of female employees in the U.S. Supreme Court. As stated, the women employees have alleged that Wal-Mart favored men over women in pay and promotions. However, Wal-Mart, in its appeal...

  • Attention Female Workers: Will Wal-Mart Roll Back the Largest Employment Discrimination Class Action Ever? Mullenix, Linda S. // Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases;Mar2011, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p249 

    The article discusses the court case, Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes, which involved the entitlement of female employees of Wal-Mart Stores in the U.S. to back pay through the enforcement of a mandatory employment discrimination class action. It examines the discrimination lawsuit filed by six female...

  • People problems on every aisle. Shuit, Douglas P. // Workforce Management;Feb2004, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p26 

    Discusses the class action lawsuit filed against retailer Wal-Mart Stores for sex discrimination as of February 2004. Outlook on the business of the retailer; Allegations of the plaintiffs; Statement issued by the Wal-Mart spokesperson. INSET: EXPLOITING WAL-MART'S WORKFORCE WEAK SPOT.

  • Judge: Wal-Mart Suit Class-Action. Bowers, Katherine; Young, Vicki M. // SN: Supermarket News;6/28/2004, Vol. 52 Issue 26, p6 

    Reports on the decision of San Francisco, California Federal Judge Martin Jenskins regarding the gender-discrimination lawsuit filed by women employees against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Response of the company to the decision; Remarks from Jenskins regarding his ruling; Opinion of analysts on the case.

  • Gender Suit Against Wal-Mart Advances.  // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;4/27/2010, Vol. 199 Issue 89, p2 

    The article discusses a suit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. regarding sex discrimination of women working in the company. The appeals court examined the class-action certification and stated that members could seek back pay and injuctive and declaratory relief. The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics