TITLE

A comparative study on the short-term clinicopathologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery for transverse colon cancer

AUTHOR(S)
Kim, H. J.; Lee, I. K.; Lee, Y. S.; Kang, W. K.; Park, J. K.; Oh, S. T.; Kim, J. G.; Kim, Y. H.
PUB. DATE
August 2009
SOURCE
Surgical Endoscopy;Aug2009, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p1812
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The long-term oncologic stability of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer was established, and laparoscopic surgery was accepted as an alternative to conventional open surgery for colon cancer. However, transverse colon cancer was excluded from the majority of the previous prospective studies. As a result, debate on laparoscopic surgery for transverse colon cancer continues. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic surgery with that of conventional open surgery for transverse colon cancer. From August 2004 to December 2007, 106 cases of transverse colon cancer were managed by resection at our institution, and 89 of these cases were included in this study. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), operation time, blood loss, time to first flatus, time to start of diet, hospital stay, complications, tumor size, distal resection margin, proximal resection margin, and number of nodes harvested were compared between the two groups. No significant differences were found between the laparoscopic and conventional groups in terms of age, sex, BMI, operation time, or hospital stay. The mean blood loss during the operations was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (113.8 ± 128.9 ml) than in the conventional group (278.8 ± 268.7 ml; p < 0.05). Moreover, the time to the first flatus was shorter (2.8 ± 0.9 days vs. 4.4 ± 2.0 days; p < 0.00) and the diet was started earlier (3.9 ± 1.7 days vs. 5.4 ± 1.9 days; p < 0.00) in the laparoscopic group. No intergroup differences in tumor size, proximal resection margin, or number of lymph nodes were observed. The mean distal resection margin was longer in the laparoscopic group (12.5 ± 4.1 cm vs. 9.2 ± 6.2 cm; p < 0.05). Laparoscopic and conventional open surgeries were found to have similar clinical outcomes in transverse colon cancer, and the oncologic quality of laparoscopic surgery was found to be acceptable compared with conventional open surgery.
ACCESSION #
43239149

 

Related Articles

  • Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse and descending colon cancer: a single-center experience. Yamamoto, Masashi; Okuda, Junji; Tanaka, Keitaro; Kondo, Keisaku; Tanigawa, Nobuhiko; Uchiyama, Kazuhisa // Surgical Endoscopy;Jun2012, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p1566 

    Background: The role of laparoscopic surgery in management of transverse and descending colon cancer remains controversial. The aim of the present study is to investigate the short-term and oncologic long-term outcomes associated with laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon...

  • Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safe and effective? – A systematic review. Lourenco, Tania; Murray, Alison; Grant, Adrian; McKinley, Aileen; Krukowski, Zygmunt; Vale, Luke // Surgical Endoscopy;May2008, Vol. 22 Issue 5, p1146 

    To determine the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic and laparoscopically assisted surgery in comparison with open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Open resection is the standard method for surgical removal of primary colorectal tumours. However, there is significant morbidity...

  • Additional colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for T1 colon cancer: a fine balance between oncologic benefit and operative risk. Benizri, Emmanuel; Bereder, Jean-Marc; Rahili, Amine; Bernard, Jean-Louis; Vanbiervliet, Geoffroy; Filippi, Jérôme; Hébuterne, Xavier; Benchimol, Daniel // International Journal of Colorectal Disease;Nov2012, Vol. 27 Issue 11, p1473 

    Purpose: The treatment of early-stage colorectal cancers removed endoscopically depends on histopathologic findings. This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk balance for patients who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic resection of a T1 carcinoma with unfavorable histology. Methods:...

  • Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Sample, C.; Watson, M.; Okrainec, A.; Gupta, R.; Birch, D.; Anvari, M.; Sample, C B // Surgical Endoscopy;Jan2006, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p30 

    Multiple reports have outlined the potential benefits of the laparoscopic approach to colon surgery. Recently, randomized control trials have demonstrated the safety of applying these techniques to colorectal cancer. This study examined the long-term follow-up assessment of patients after...

  • Laparoscopic resection with intraoperative radiotherapy: a new step in the multimodal treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Civello, I.; Cavicchioni, C.; Tacchino, R.; Matera, D.; Valentini, V.; Manfrida, S.; Greco, F.; Civello, I M; Tacchino, R M // Surgical Endoscopy;Feb2007, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p330 

    Background: Local recurrence is one of the most important problems related to resection of rectal cancer in locally advanced cases (T3-T4). Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the mainstay of surgical therapy, although many articles have been published about the availability of...

  • Transanal total mesorectal excision: a pure NOTES approach for selected patients. Leão, P.; Goulart, A.; Veiga, C.; Cristino, H.; Marcos, N.; Correia-Pinto, J.; Rodrigues, M.; Moreno-Sanz, C. // Techniques in Coloproctology;Sep2015, Vol. 19 Issue 9, p541 

    Background: The concept of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has stimulated the development of various 'incisionless' procedures. One of the most popular is the transanal approach for rectal lesions. The aims of this study were to report how we standardized NOTES technique...

  • Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer. Mistrangelo, Massimiliano; Allaix, Marco; Cassoni, Paola; Giraudo, Giuseppe; Arolfo, Simone; Morino, Mario // Surgical Endoscopy;Aug2015, Vol. 29 Issue 8, p2196 

    Background: Previous large randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic (LR) and open resection (OR) for colon cancer have not specifically analyzed the outcomes in patients with transverse colon cancer. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LR transverse...

  • Laparoscopic liver resection: preliminary results from a UK centre. Alkari, B.; Owera, A.; Ammori, B. J. // Surgical Endoscopy;Oct2008, Vol. 22 Issue 10, p2201 

    Advancements in surgical technique and technology have facilitated safe laparoscopic liver resection in selected patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection. Patients with lesions situated in the anterior and left lateral segments...

  • Minimally invasive management of colon cancer. Zerey, Marc; Burns, Justin M.; Kercher, Kent W.; Kuwada, Timothy S.; Heniford, B. Todd // Surgical Innovation;Mar2006, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p5 

    One of the most controversial issues in minimally invasive surgery has been the implementation of laparoscopic techniques for the curative resection of colorectal malignancies. Initial concerns included the potential violation of oncologic principles, the effects of carbon dioxide, and the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics