TITLE

Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study

AUTHOR(S)
Borgmeier, Ingrid; Westenhoefer, Joachim
PUB. DATE
January 2009
SOURCE
BMC Public Health;2009, Vol. 9, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Front of pack food labels or signpost labels are currently widely discussed as means to help consumers to make informed food choices. It is hoped that more informed food choices will result in an overall healthier diet. There is only limited evidence, as to which format of a food label is best understood by consumers, helps them best to differentiate between more or less healthy food and whether these changes in perceived healthiness result in changes of food choice. Methods: In a randomised experimental study in Hamburg/Germany 420 adult subjects were exposed to one of five experimental conditions: (1) a simple "healthy choice" tick, (2) a multiple traffic light label, (3) a monochrome Guideline Daily Amount (GDA) label, (4) a coloured GDA label and (5) a "no label" condition. In the first task they had to identify the healthier food items in 28 pair-wise comparisons of foods from different food groups. In the second task they were asked to select food portions from a range of foods to compose a one-day's consumption. Differences between means were analysed using ANOVAs. Results: Task I: Experimental conditions differed significantly in the number of correct decisions (p < 0.001). In the condition "no label" subjects had least correct decisions (20.2 ± 3.2), in the traffic light condition most correct decisions were made (24.8 ± 2.4). Task II: Envisaged daily food consumption did not differ significantly between the experimental conditions. Conclusion: Different food label formats differ in the understanding of consumers. The current study shows, that German adults profit most from the multiple traffic light labels. Perceived healthiness of foods is influenced by this label format most often. Nevertheless, such changes in perceived healthiness are unlikely to influence food choice and consumption. Attempts to establish the informed consumer with the hope that informed choices will be healthier choices are unlikely to change consumer behaviour and will not result in the desired contribution to the prevention of obesity and diet related diseases.
ACCESSION #
43227041

 

Related Articles

  • Industry welcomes Conservative Party's proposals to battle obesity.  // Food Manufacture;Sep2008, Vol. 83 Issue 9, p5 

    The article reports on the support of the food industry to the proposal for a future Conservative government to forge a non-bureaucratic partnership with processors in a bid to tackle concerns over obesity in Great Britain. According to the Food and Drink Federation (FDF), Andrew Lansley's...

  • Foodservice 101: The Basics.  // Convenience Store News;Jun2012, Vol. 48 Issue 8, p78 

    The article focuses on the importance of menu labeling for food service providers in the U.S. It mentions about the rising cases of obesity in the U.S., which has tripled in the past 20 years and states that labeling the calorie content in a food item will enable consumers to monitor their...

  • Obesity prevention and personal responsibility: the case of front-of-pack food labelling in Australia. Magnusson, Roger S. // BMC Public Health;2010, Vol. 10, p662 

    Background: In Australia, the food industry and public health groups are locked in serious struggle for regulatory influence over the terms of front-of-pack food labelling. Clear, unambiguous labelling of the nutritional content of pre-packaged foods and of standardized food items sold in chain...

  • Health Star Rating food labelling scheme gets the go-ahead. CARTWRIGHT, ANGELA // Choice;Aug2014, p5 

    The article reports on the Health Star Rating food labelling scheme that has been approved by the federal, state and territory government food health ministers of Australia.

  • Labelling, obesity and the Titanic's deckchairs.  // Food Manufacture;Dec2012, Vol. 87 Issue 12, p12 

    The article discusses issues related to food labeling in Great Britain. The author believes that traffic light labels on composite foods and ready meals is beneficial where information is not otherwise easy to gauge and compare. It is informed that supermarkets should have one huge red traffic...

  • Post Nestle's Maggi fiasco, food cos like PepsiCo, Parle, Yum! Brands play safe; highlight safety aspect.  // FRPT- FMCG Snapshot;6/7/2015, p15 

    The article reports on the move of local food companies in India to limit any collateral damage by declaring more ingredient details on packaging, highlighting product safety in advertisement and increasing engagement with consumers through social media following the Nestle's Maggi noodles fiasco.

  • African packaging on a growth path.  // South African Food Review;1/28/2016, p1 

    The article offers information on the Propak Africa 2016 which is described as one of Africa's largest packaging, food processing, and plastic, printing and labelling trade exhibitions.

  • Some food labels still may be erroneous. The Associated Press // Marketing News;9/24/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 20, p52 

    The article reports on results of tests conducted by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and obtained by the "South Florida Sun-Sentinel" newspaper showing several items with inaccurate food labels. It claims that three out of four diet products tested by the department...

  • food labels: what do they mean? Thompson, Sue // Australian Parents;Apr/May2003, p58 

    Focuses on the changes on to labelling on food packages in Australia, as of June 2003. Explanation on the nutrition information panel; Nutrients that may be listed; Information on the ingredient list.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics