Evaluation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in a Veteran Sample

Smith, Sherri L.; Noe, Colleen M.; Alexander, Genevieve C.
June 2009
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Jun2009, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p374
Academic Journal
Background: The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) was developed as a global hearing aid outcome measure targeting seven outcome domains. The published norms were based on a private-pay sample who were fitted with analog hearing aids. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the IOI-HA and to establish normative data in a veteran sample. Research Design: Survey. Study Sample: The participants were 131 male veterans (mean age of 74.3 years, SD = 7.4) who were issued hearing aids with digital signal processing (DSP). Intervention: Hearing aids with DSP that were fitted bilaterally between 2005 and 2007. Data Collection and Analysis: Veterans were mailed two copies of the IOI-HA. The participants were instructed to complete the first copy of the questionnaire immediately and the second copy in two weeks. The completed questionnaires were mailed to the laboratory. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were evaluated. As suggested by Cox and colleagues, the participants were divided into two categories based on their unaided subjective hearing difficulty. The two categories were (1) those with less hearing difficulty (none-to-moderate category) and (2) those who report more hearing difficulty (moderately severe+ category). The norms from the current veteran sample then were compared to the original, published sample. For each hearing difficulty category, the critical difference values were calculated for each item and for the total score. Results: A factor analysis showed that the IOI-HA in the veteran sample had the identical subscale structure as reported in the original sample. For the total scale, the internal consistency was good (Chronbach's α = 0.83), and the test-retest reliability was high (γ = 0.94). Group and individual norms were developed for both hearing difficulty categories in the veteran sample. For each IOI-HA item, the critical difference scores were <1.0. This finding suggests that for any item on the IOI-HA, there is a 95 percent chance that an observed change of one response unit between two test sessions reflects a true change in outcome for a given domain. Conclusions: The results of this study confirmed that the psychometric properties of the IOI-HA questionnaire are strong and are essentially the same for the veteran sample and the original private-pay sample. The veteran norms, however, produced higher outcomes than those established originally, possibly because of differences in the population samples and/or hearing aid technology. Clinical and research applications of the current findings are presented. Based on the results from the current study, the norms established here should replace the original norms for use in veterans with current hearing aid technology.


Related Articles

  • News in Brief.  // ASHA Leader;7/20/2004, Vol. 9 Issue 13, p3 

    Reports developments related to audiology in the U.S. as of July 2004. Schedule for the 28th International Congress of Audiology; Qualification of the Purple Heart recipients for the Department of Veterans Affairs sensorineural aid benefit; Highlights of the Pan-American Congress of Audiology.

  • How Do You Future-Proof a Hearing Instrument. Stender, Tammara // Audiology Online;7/25/2011, p1 

    The article provides an answer to a question of how to future-proof a hearing instrument to meet changing patient needs.

  • Common Mistakes in Routine Hearing Aid Fitting. Beyer, Cindy // Audiology Online;9/19/2011, p1 

    The article provides an answer to a question on the fundamental guidelines of achieving a consistent, accurate process to minimize risks involved in fitting and programming hearing aids.

  • Rechargeable Hearing Aids Revisited. Yanz, Jerry // Audiology Online;9/26/2011, p2 

    The article provides an answer to a question about current advancements in custom rechargeable hearing aids.

  • Dead Regions and Hearing Aid Fitting. Hornsby, Benjamin W. Y. // Audiology Online;10/3/2011, p1 

    The article provides an answer to a question about hearing aid fitting protocols among patients with cochlear dead regions.

  • Can you hear me? Diaz, Katharine A. // Hispanic;Sep2000, Vol. 13 Issue 9, p88 

    Evaluates Songbird, a disposable hearing aid. Features of the device; Cost.

  • The effects of improving hearing in dementia. Allen, N. Harry; Burns, Alistair; Newton, Valerie; Hickson, Frances; Ramsden, Richard; Rogers, Jenny; Butler, Sue; Thistlewaite, Gillian; Morris, Julie // Age & Ageing;Mar2003, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p189 

    Presents a study that assessed the effects of increasing auditory acuity by providing hearing aids to subjects with dementia who have mild hearing loss. Aims of the study; Methods; Results; Discussion.

  • Hearing Care: Tinnitus. Andress, Gina // Hudson Valley Business Journal;Jun2003 Supplement, Vol. 14 Issue 11, p4 

    Reports on the treatment of tinnitus in the U.S. Recommendation of hearing aid for mild to moderate tinnitus and hearing loss; Clinical features of tinnitus-retraining therapy; Effectiveness of tinnitus control devices and tinnitus control hearing aids. INSETS: Questions to ask the...

  • Hearing aid designs.  // Hudson Valley Business Journal;Jun2003 Supplement, Vol. 14 Issue 11, p5 

    Focuses on the programming features and styles of hearing aids. Size of the Completely-in-the-Canal hearing aids; Fit of Behind-the-Ear hearing aids; Recommendation of the In-the-Ear hearing aids.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics