To Screen or Not to Screen? A Decision Analysis of the Utility of Screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Mahan, Susan T.; Katz, Jeffrey N.; Young-Jo Kim
July 2009
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Jul2009, Vol. 91-A Issue 7, p1705
Academic Journal
Background: The United States Preventive Services Task Force recently determined that they could not recommend any screening strategies for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Disparate findings in the literature and treatment-related problems have led to confusion about whether or not to screen for this disorder. The purpose of the present study was to determine, with use of expected-value decision analysis, which of the following three strategies leads to the best chance of having a non-arthritic hip by the age of sixty years: (1) no screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip, (2) universal screening of newborns with both physical examination and ultrasonography, or (3) universal screening with physical examination but only selective use of ultrasonography for neonates considered to be at high risk. Methods: Developmental dysplasia of the hip, avascular necrosis, and the treatment algorithm were carefully defined. The outcome was determined as the probability of any neonate having a non-arthritic hip through the age of sixty years. A decision tree was then built with decision nodes as described above, and chance node probabilities were determined from a thorough review of the literature. Foldback analysis and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: The expected value of a favorable hip outcome was 0.9590 for the strategy of screening all neonates with physical examination and selective use of ultrasonography, 0.9586 for screening all neonates with physical examination and ultrasonography, and 0.9578 for no screening. A lower expected value implies a greater risk for the development of osteoarthritis as a result of developmental dysplasia of the hip or avascular necrosis; thus, the optimum strategy was selective screening. This model was robust to sensitivity analysis, except when the rate of missed dysplasia rose as high as 4/1000 or the rate of treated hip subluxation/dislocation was the same; then, the optimum strategy was to screen all neonates with both physical examination and ultrasonography. Conclusions: Our decision analytic model indicated that the optimum strategy, associated with the highest probability of having a non-arthritic hip at the age of sixty years, was to screen all neonates for hip dysplasia with a physical examination and to use ultrasonography selectively for infants who are at high risk. Additional data on the costs and cost-effectiveness of these screening policies are needed to guide policy recommendations.


Related Articles

  • Performance, treatment pathways, and effects of alternative policy options for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the United Kingdom. Dezateux C; Brown J; Arthur R; Karnon J; Parnaby A // Archives of Disease in Childhood;Sep2003, Vol. 88 Issue 9, p753 

    AIMS: To compare, using a decision model, performance, treatment pathways and effects of different newborn screening strategies for developmental hip dysplasia with no screening. METHODS: Detection rate, radiological absence of subluxation at skeletal maturity and avascular necrosis of the...

  • Ultrasonography in the Assessment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Yawn, Barbara P.; Mabry, Iris R.; Ko, Stephen // American Family Physician;10/15/2006, Vol. 74 Issue 8, p1284 

    The article presents the authors' opinion on the use of ultrasonography in the assessment of developmental dyslapia of the hip among children. The effectiveness of universal screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the prevention of long-term disability is unknown. Dynamic...

  • Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Riboni, Giuseppe; Bellini, Aldo; Serantoni, Sergio; Rognoni, Elena; Bisanti, Luigi // Pediatric Radiology;Jul2003, Vol. 33 Issue 7, p475 

    Background: Clinical examination of newborns has been shown to be inadequate for the early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). It is debatable whether US examination is a valid alternative.Objective: To contribute further knowledge to the natural...

  • Indicators of successful use of the Pavlik harness in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip. H. Atalar; U. Sayli; O. Yavuz; I. Uraş; H. Dogruel // International Orthopaedics;Apr2007, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p145 

    Abstract  This study examined the outcomes of ultrasound-monitored Pavlik harness treatment in 25 infants (2 boys and 23 girls) representing a total of 31 cases of developmental dysplasia of the hip of Graf type IIc or more severe. For all infants, Pavlik harness treatment...

  • Severe subluxation of the femoral head after rotational acetabular osteotomy: a case report. Nozawa, Masahiko; Matsuda, Keiji; Maezawa, Katsuhiko; Kim, Sungon; Maeda, Kouichi; Kurosawa, Hisashi // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;May2009, Vol. 129 Issue 5, p571 

    We encountered a rare case of severe subluxation of the femoral head after the performance of rotational acetabular osteotomy to treat osteoarthritis of the hip, secondary to acetabular dysplasia. The subluxation was corrected by performing varus and flexion osteotomy.

  • A szonográfiás csípÅ‘szűrÅ‘ vizsgálat újabb tapasztalatai. ILONA, ANDRÁSSY // Magyar Traumatológia, Ortopédia, Kézsebészet, Plasztikai Seb;2012, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p213 

    Irrespective of patient's history and result of the physical examination, author performed ultrasonic screening in addition to 7735 infants' 15670 hips screening in the period from March 1999. to January 2010. Using Graf's classification, he observed in this miscellaneous patient population...

  • Developmental Hip Dislocation Among Infants at King Hussein Medical Center. Bderat, Jwaher; Imam, Ola // Middle East Journal of Family Medicine;Oct2011, Vol. 9 Issue 8, p16 

    Objective: To compare the clinical radiological, and sonographic, role in the diagnosis of developmental hip dislocation among infants aged 3-6 months screened in the pediatric clinic at King Hussein Medical Hospital. Method: All infants aged from 3-6 months who were seen to screen for DDH in...

  • Ultrasonography helpful in diagnosing developmental hip dysplasia. Bowe, Jennifer; Lindbloom, Erik J. // Journal of Family Practice;May2003, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p355 

    Ultrasonography for diagnosis and management of possible hip instability may lead to less splinting and surgery in the first 2 years of life, with no significant difference in radiographic abnormalities. Cost-effectiveness, long-term hip mobility, and consistency of ultrasound interpretation is...

  • Screening and treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip-where do we go from here? Sewell, Mathew; Eastwood, Deborah // International Orthopaedics;Sep2011, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p1359 

    Purpose: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a leading cause of disability in childhood and early adult life. Clinical and sonographic screening programmes have been used to facilitate early detection but the effectiveness of both screening strategies is unproven. This article discusses...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics