TITLE

Seasonal Ensemble Forecasts: Are Recalibrated Single Models Better than Multimodels?

AUTHOR(S)
Weigel, Andreas P.; Liniger, Mark A.; Appenzeller, Christof
PUB. DATE
April 2009
SOURCE
Monthly Weather Review;Apr2009, Vol. 137 Issue 4, p1460
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Multimodel ensemble combination (MMEC) has become an accepted technique to improve probabilistic forecasts from short- to long-range time scales. MMEC techniques typically widen ensemble spread, thus improving the dispersion characteristics and the reliability of the forecasts. This raises the question as to whether the same effect could be achieved in a potentially cheaper way by rescaling single model ensemble forecasts a posteriori such that they become reliable. In this study a climate conserving recalibration (CCR) technique is derived and compared with MMEC. With a simple stochastic toy model it is shown that both CCR and MMEC successfully improve forecast reliability. The difference between these two methods is that CCR conserves resolution but inevitably dilutes the potentially predictable signal while MMEC is in the ideal case able to fully retain the predictable signal and to improve resolution. Therefore, MMEC is conceptually to be preferred, particularly since the effect of CCR depends on the length of the data record and on distributional assumptions. In reality, however, multimodels consist only of a finite number of participating single models, and the model errors are often correlated. Under such conditions, and depending on the skill metric applied, CCR-corrected single models can on average have comparable skill as multimodel ensembles, particularly when the potential model predictability is low. Using seasonal near-surface temperature and precipitation forecasts of three models of the Development of a European Multimodel Ensemble System for Seasonal-to-Interannual Prediction (DEMETER) dataset, it is shown that the conclusions drawn from the toy-model experiments hold equally in a real multimodel ensemble prediction system. All in all, it is not possible to make a general statement on whether CCR or MMEC is the better method. Rather it seems that optimum forecasts can be obtained by a combination of both methods, but only if first MMEC and then CCR is applied. The opposite order—first CCR, then MMEC—is shown to be of only little effect, at least in the context of seasonal forecasts.
ACCESSION #
43016959

 

Related Articles

  • Reducing Probabilistic Weather Forecasts to the Worst-Case Scenario: Anchoring Effects. Joslyn, Susan; Savelli, Sonia; Nadav-Greenberg, Limor // Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied;Dec2011, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p342 

    Many weather forecast providers believe the forecast uncertainty in the form of the worst-case scenario would be useful for general public end users. We tested this suggestion in 4 studies using realistic weather-related decision tasks involving high winds and low temperatures. College...

  • A Comparison of Probabilistic Forecasts from Bred, Singular-Vector, and Perturbed Observation Ensembles. Hamill, Thomas M.; Snyder, Chris; Morss, Rebecca E. // Monthly Weather Review;Jun2000, Vol. 128 Issue 6, p1835 

    The statistical properties of analysis and forecast errors from commonly used ensemble perturbation methodologies are explored. A quasigeostrophic channel model is used, coupled with a 3D-variational data assimilation scheme. A perfect model is assumed. Three perturbation methodologies are...

  • Experience of using a dynamic stochastic approach for solving the problem of very short-range forecasting of state parameters of the atmospheric boundary layer. Komarov, V.; Lavrinenko, A.; Lomakina, N.; Il'in, S. // Russian Meteorology & Hydrology;Feb2014, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p77 

    Discussed are the results of applying a dynamic stochastic method based on the use of the two-dimensional model and the Kalman filtering algorithm for solving the problem of the very short-range (from 0.5 to 6 hours) fore cast of air temperature and orthogonal components of the wind speed in the...

  • Locally Calibrated Probabilistic Temperature Forecasting Using Geostatistical Model Averaging and Local Bayesian Model Averaging. Kleiber, William; Raftery, Adrian E.; Baars, Jeffrey; Gneiting, Tilmann; Mass, Clifford F.; Grimit, Eric // Monthly Weather Review;Aug2011, Vol. 139 Issue 8, p2630 

    The authors introduce two ways to produce locally calibrated grid-based probabilistic forecasts of temperature. Both start from the Global Bayesian model averaging (Global BMA) statistical postprocessing method, which has constant predictive bias and variance across the domain, and modify it to...

  • Probabilistic interpretation of forecasts of ice phase onset dates in Ob-Taz mouth area. Dmitriev, V.; Shevnina, E. // Water Resources;Jan2006, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p33 

    The results of a posteriori probabilistic interpretation of forecasts of freezing and ice breaking dates in Ob-Taz mouth area are presented. The method of interpretation is based on the use of conditional distributions of errors in forecasting continuous variables. Parameter estimates of the...

  • California's cool, Arizona's hot.  // Air Conditioning Heating & Refrigeration News;07/19/99, Vol. 207 Issue 12, p13 

    No abstract available.

  • Still looks to be a mite warm.  // Air Conditioning Heating & Refrigeration News;10/18/99, Vol. 208 Issue 7, p18 

    Reports on the temperature outlook for November-December 1999 and January 2000 in the United States. Temperature ranges in various regions; Coverage of warm and cool areas; Precipitation during the period; States affected by drier-than-normal and wetter-than-normal conditions.

  • Heat me in September: A warm and dry month.  // Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration News;10/19/98, Vol. 205 Issue 7, p31 

    Reports on the above-normal temperatures that prevailed in most regions of the United States in September 1998. Comparison with the temperature in September 1997; Warmest cities relative to normal; Cities with cooler-than-normal temperatures; Precipitation in all regions.

  • +3°c.  // BRW;9/17/2009, Vol. 31 Issue 37, p8 

    The article informs that +3 degrees celcius is the expected temperature in August 2009 in Australia according to the Bureau of Meteorology.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics