Problems for clinical judgement: 2. Obtaining a reliable past medical history

Redelmeier, Donald A.; Tu, Jack V.; Schull, Michael J.; Ferris, Lorraine E.; Hux, Janet E.
March 2001
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;3/20/2001, Vol. 164 Issue 6, p809
Academic Journal
Ordinary human reasoning may lead patients to provide an unreliable history of past experiences because of errors in comprehension, recall, evaluation and expression. Comprehension of a question may change depending on the definition of periods of time and prior questions. Recall fails through the loss of relevant information, the fabrication of misinformation and distracting cues. Evaluations may be mistaken because of the "halo effect" and a reluctance to change personal beliefs. Expression is influenced by social culture and the environment. These errors can also occur when patients report a history of present illness, but they tend to be more prominent with experiences that are more remote. An awareness of these specific human fallibilities might help clinicians avoid some errors when eliciting a patient's past medical history.


Related Articles

  • Pieces of the puzzle. Singer, Karl // Patient Care;Feb2005, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p75 

    Presents an article about the views of a physician on patient diagnosis. Elements of patient diagnosis; Factors that need to be included in medical history taking; Challenge associated with making diagnosis.

  • A First Step in the Right Direction. Woodworth, Kenneth E. // Review of Ophthalmology;Jul2004, Vol. 11 Issue 7, p21 

    Focuses on the key elements for taking a patients history during an examination . Emphasis on the relationship between the history and efficiency cost-saving operations; Importance of the reason of the patient's visit for taking patient history; Link of reimbursement and efficiency to the chief...

  • Opinion: How to regain control of the consultation room. Selby, Mary // GP: General Practitioner;2/8/2012, p17 

    The article humorously narrates how to regain control of the consultation room, which the author calls the Short Consultation Model. It advises the doctors to start with history, though her condition of illness is known. While receiving the response, surf the net for a good source of coffee...

  • Historian. Lucas, Helen // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);11/24/2001, Vol. 323 Issue 7323, p1243 

    Comments on medical history taking by doctors. How doctors sometimes refer to patients as bad historians when they receive an unclear story; Thought that an unclear story may represent a symptom of the patient's illness and should be recognized by the doctor; Opinion that doctors are sometimes...

  • Tips for better history-taking. D'Epiro, Peter // Patient Care;Jun2002, Vol. 36 Issue 8, p58 

    Offers physicians several tips for taking an accurate and sensitive patient history. Way to establish a therapeutic relationship; Importance of following and engaging in the patient's narrative; Type of questioning to use with older people. INSETS: This article at a glance;Careful...

  • The Most Important Diagnostic Test. Holm, Richard P. // South Dakota Medicine;May2015, Vol. 68 Issue 5, p227 

    The article discusses the need for physicians to listen carefully to their patients before prescribing the treatment. It criticizes the increasing dependency of modern medical providers on fancy and expensive tests. It adds that the physical examination of the patient and analysis of the disease...

  • Is this "free" technology worth it? Weiss, Gail Garfinkel // Medical Economics;11/3/2006, Vol. 83 Issue 21, p51 

    The article provides information on handheld webpads that prompt patients to type their name on a touch-screen keyboard, then answer a series of multiple-choice questions about their history and presenting problem. When patients finish, a report is automatically sent via electronic mail to the...

  • Lights, camera ... Litigation.  // Cortlandt Forum;12/21/98, Vol. 11 Issue 12, p43 

    Presents a medical case highlighting the importance of getting and recording a correct history of the patient. Consistency as not a guarantee of credibility; Advice to physicians when dealing with difficult patients; Case background.

  • Diagnostic interviewing: Make the most of your time. Branch, William T.; Levinson, Wendy // Patient Care;7/15/1996, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p68 

    Presents techniques for physicians to help in day-to-day encounters with patients to produce more useful information. Importance of a collaborative process when interviewing patients; Need for patients to express all their concerns; Symmetric needs in a successful model of clinical interviewing....


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics