TITLE

"BUT I'M DENNY CRANE!": AGE DISCRIMINATION IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION AFTER SIDLEY

AUTHOR(S)
Labriola, Donald J.
PUB. DATE
February 2009
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2009, Vol. 72 Issue 1, p367
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the issue of age discrimination in the legal profession based on the U.S. Supreme Court cases of Smith versus City of Jackson, Mississippi and EEOC versus Sidley Austin Brown & Wood. An overview of the provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) is provided. The mechanics of an age-discrimination claim is detailed. Some guidelines for law firms are provided in order for them to minimize the risk of litigation in relation to age discrimination.
ACCESSION #
41995312

 

Related Articles

  • SMITH et al. v. CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI, et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Smith et al. v. City of Jackson, Mississippi, et al., case number 03-1160, argued on November 3, 2004 and decided on March 30, 2005. The lawsuit was filed by a group of old police officers in response to the decision of the city of...

  • RIGHT WITHOUT A REMEDY?: SUPREME COURT ALLOWS DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS UNDER THE ADEA. Bible, Jon // Labor Law Journal;Fall2005, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p161 

    This article examines the U.S. Supreme Court case, Smith versus City of Jackson, decided in March 2005. The Supreme Court held 5-3 that disparate impact claims may proceed under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, which protects employees and job applicants aged 40 and over from...

  • U.S. Supreme Courts Finds Disparate Impact Claims Available Under ADEA.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q2, p1 

    The article provides information on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Smith v. City of Jackson, Miss. that disparate impact claims are available to plaintiffs suing for discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The claims may see employers' practice to...

  • CORPORATE REORGANIZATIONS, JOB LAYOFFS, AND AGE DISCRIMINATION: HAS SMITH V. CITY OF JACKSON SUBSTANTIALLY EXPANDED THE RIGHTS OF OLDER WORKERS UNDER THE ADEA? Alaka, Aída M. // Albany Law Review;2006, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p143 

    The article examines the extent to which employee rights have expanded as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's analysis of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) in the case Smith versus City of Jackson. It recalls the history of the disparate-impact theory of recovery under...

  • Significant Supreme Court Employment Rulings. Euben, Donna R. // Academe;Jul/Aug2005, Vol. 91 Issue 4, p70 

    This article examines the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court on some employment-related cases in 2005. In March the court answered affirmatively two legal queries percolating among the lower courts. In Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, the court ruled that Title IX encompasses claims by...

  • Education and the Supreme Court: The 2004-05 Term.  // Education Week;7/13/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 42, p29 

    The article focuses on some of the U.S. Supreme Court cases that were of particular interest to educators during the 2004-05 term. In one of the cases, Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, the high court ruled that teachers and coaches who suffer reprisals for complaining about illegal sex...

  • Older Workers May Sue, Court Affirms. Bradley, Gwendolyn // Academe;Jul/Aug2005, Vol. 91 Issue 4, p11 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in March 2005 which stated that legal actions can be brought challenging policies that have a disparate impact on older workers. The case, Smith v. City of Jackson, involved older police officers who challenged policies in Jackson,...

  • THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S 2004 TERM: DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS UNDER THE AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT. Craver, Charles B.; Drummonds, Henry H.; McCann, Laurie // Labor Law Journal;Winter2005, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p271 

    The article discusses the Supreme Court's decision in the Smith v. City of Jackson case. The Court ruled in a split vote that older workers are allowed to make disparate impact claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Other cases mentioned include Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural...

  • Supreme Court Allows "Disparate Impact" Lawsuits but Severely Limits Plaintiffs' Ability to Succeed in Such Suits. Cohen, Joel E.; Groman, Dawn J. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q2, p1 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court (SC) case of Smith v. City of Jackson, Mississippi, decided on March 30, 2005. SC ruled that disparate impact lawsuits are viable under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act as it has long been for race, national origin and sex discrimination...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics