TITLE

Wiretap in 2000 ruled unlawful

PUB. DATE
June 2009
SOURCE
Slovak Spectator;6/15/2009, Vol. 15 Issue 23, p2
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
41873944

 

Related Articles

  • Macedonia Kills 'Gag Bill' Amid Protests.  // Transitions Online;10/12/2015, p20 

    The article reports on the decision of the parliament of Macedonia to withdraw a legislative bill that would have made it a criminal offense to publish materials related to allegations of unlawful mass wiretapping amid protests. It mentions the investigation a special public prosecutor into...

  • The fool's gold ring of safety. Bradner, Scott // Network World;8/22/2005, Vol. 22 Issue 33, p60 

    Comments on the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in which it revoked a previous ruling to remove all wiretapping protection from the Internet. Citation that the ruling is important as the Internet industry is back to where it was prior to the first ruling; Possibility...

  • Court Clarifies Devilish CALEA Details. Rockwell, Mark // Wireless Week;01/28/2002, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p9 

    Reports on the ruling by a U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. over the wiretapping capabilities of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Law which provides the FBI the authority to conduct wiretapping; Discussion on the wiretapping procedure of the FBI; Details on the ruling;...

  • THE ETHICAL DILEMMA OF THE USA GOVERNMENT WIRETAPPING. Mullikin, Arwen; Rahman, Syed (Shawon) M. // International Journal of Managing Information Technology;Nov2010, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p32 

    USA Government wiretapping activities is a very controversial issue. Undoubtedly this technology can assist law enforced authority to detect / identify unlawful or hostile activities; however, this task raises severe privacy concerns. In this paper, we have discussed this complex information...

  • WIRETAPPING. Pollak, Louis H. // New Republic;5/16/60, Vol. 142 Issue 20, p13 

    Focuses on wiretapping in the U.S. Information that the U.S. Supreme Court held that the enactment in 1934 of the Federal Communications Act forbade the disclosure in a federal court of information gained by wiretapping, and therefore required the reversal of convictions supported by such...

  • Ban on prisoners receiving books is illegal, say judges. Ian Drury // Daily Mail;12/6/2014, p6 

    A BAN on sending books to criminals in jail is unlawful, a court ruled yesterday.

  • Ban on prisoners receiving books is illegal says judge. Ian Drury // Daily Mail;12/6/2014, p6 

    A BAN on sending books to criminals in jail is unlawful, a court ruled yesterday.

  • Prison book ban is ruled unlawful.  // Daily Mail;12/6/2014, p7 

    A BAN on sending books to criminals in jail is unlawful, a court ruled yesterday.

  • Silliest 'wiretapping' charges ever recorded. McNamara, Paul // Network World;9/14/2009, Vol. 26 Issue 28, p34 

    The article reports that Chi Quang Truong was being charged with wiretapping by the police in Natick, Massachusetts. Truong was underarrest after an Olympus digital voice recorder was discovered in his pocket and caught taping conversation of employees at Honda dealership. It adds that Truong...

  • Boehner v. McDermott: Trafficking in Illegally Intercepted Information. Karanjia, Peter // Communications Lawyer;Winter2005, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p10 

    The article focuses on decisions taken by the U.S. district court for the district of Columbia, in the wiretap case Boehner v. McDermott. The Boehner decisions, both authored by Chief Judge Thomas Hogan, the same judge who denied recognition of a federal reporter' s privilege in the Valerie...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics