TITLE

Debate

PUB. DATE
February 2001
SOURCE
Scholastic News -- Edition 4;02/19/2001, Vol. 63 Issue 17, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents a debate whether athletes in the United States get paid too much.
ACCESSION #
4161466

 

Related Articles

  • Remove top athletes from games?  // Scholastic News -- Edition 5/6;3/20/2006, Vol. 74 Issue 19, p7 

    This article presents the views of two individuals on a debate regarding whether top athletes be removed from a basketball game when their teams are winning by a lot. Vanessa Esparza of Illinois said yes, if one player scores most of the points in a game, then the other teammates are not playing...

  • Limits for Athletes' Earnings?  // Scholastic News -- Edition 4;3/22/2004, Vol. 66 Issue 19, p7 

    Presents the views of students regarding the debate on whether there should be limits on how much athletes earn in the U.S.

  • SENATE MELTDOWN SMELLS. OLANDER, DOUG // Sport Fishing;Oct2014, p8 

    The article discusses the debate in the U.S. Senate concerning the Bipartisan Sportsmen's Act. Topics covered include the impact of the bill on sportsmen as well as expected amendments to be made in the proposal. Also mentioned is the effect of the proposal on the operations of the U.S....

  • Untitled. Pearce, Edward // New Statesman & Society;5/21/93, Vol. 6 Issue 253, p22 

    Opinion. Compares parliamentary debaters in Great Britain and those in other countries. American legislators as the worst; Comments on speeches in Germany and Australia; Reasons for British brilliance in polemics; Politicians in Britain that are noteworthy.

  • Assessing the jurisdictional model of topicality. Murphy, Thomas L. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p145 

    Examines the implications of topicality as a jurisdictional issue in debate. Definition of jurisdiction; Subject matter jurisdiction and the notion of guidance; Special appearance, waiver and reverse voting issues; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • The jurisdiction/topicality analogy. Madsen, Arnie; Louden, Allan D. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p151 

    Comments on an article by Thomas L. Murphy about the jurisdiction standard of topicality in debate. Relationship between topicality and jurisdiction; Responses to indictments of the jurisdiction model; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • Counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions. Ulrich, Walter R. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p154 

    Examines the counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions in debate. Domains of a resolution and topical counterplan theory; Topic selection as a selection of focus in the debate.

  • Hats off.  // New Hampshire Business Review;9/1/95, Vol. 17 Issue 18, p5 

    Reports on the debate at Salem High School, New Hampshire, regarding whether to ban all headgear in school for reasons other than religion, health or safety.

  • Evaluating student learning with mock debates. Nicaise, Molly; Brown, Jennifer // Contemporary Education;1997, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p131 

    Analyzes the role of mock debates in student learning evaluation. Benefits of mock debates; Improvement of communication skills, application skills and general knowledge; Description and purpose of mock debates; Determination of student understanding; Stress on the issues of cost and time;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics