TITLE

Tennessee appeals court removes judge from James Earl Ray case

PUB. DATE
March 1998
SOURCE
Jet;03/30/98, Vol. 93 Issue 18, p46
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that Judge Joe Brown of the Criminal Court in Memphis, Tennessee has been removed from the case of James Earl Ray due to indications of alleged bias. Details of how Brown appeared to go beyond reasonable bounds in trying to get Ray to recant his confession to the shooting of Martin Luther King Jr.
ACCESSION #
416097

 

Related Articles

  • "I Did Not Shoot King" Ray gets his hearing, but a committee turns critical.  // Time; 

    The article reports on the attainment of legal hearing of James Earl Ray, an American murderer convicted of the assassination of American civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr. It stresses that Ray desired a legal hearing in order to nullify his own confession and prove his innocence of...

  • James Earl Ray trial could free the ghosts of Memphis. Murdock, Deroy // Headway;Apr97, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p20 

    Focuses on case of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the charged of shootout to James Earl Ray. Evidences that pleaded Ray guilty; Ballistic analysis of the bullet that hits King; Unusual activity recalled by Earl Cadwell, New York Times correspondent; Other witness for the shooting aside from...

  • Cases.  // Journal of Criminal Law;Jun2007, Vol. 71 Issue 3, pv 

    The article presents a list of court cases.

  • Untitled.  // New Yorker;11/11/1974, Vol. 50 Issue 38, p139 

    An excerpt from "Jacksonville Florida Times-Union," is presented concerning a litigation proceeding.

  • Prop 8 appeal to be heard Dec. 6.  // Windy City Times;10/27/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p9 

    The article announces that oral arguments in the Proposition 8 case, Perry v. Schwarzenegger, will be heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on December 6, 2010 at 10 a.m. at the James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse in San Francisco, California.

  • Court Unreasonably Refuses to Suspend Trial for Litigant's Religious Observance. Zemil, Brian A. // Litigation News;Summer2011, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p7 

    The article discusses a court case, Neustadter v. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver spring Inc., wherein the highest court of Maryland released that the court can misuse its discretion by refusing to suspend case of a litigant because of his two days absence for religious reason. It further states...

  • Plaintiff's Own Testimony Dooms Case. Rogak, Lawrence N. // Insurance Advocate;1/2/2006, Vol. 117 Issue 1, p12 

    The article presents the court case of Torain versus Labiner filed at the Civil Court in Bronx County, New York. The reason of the complaint was the plaintiff's fall from a flight of stairs at the defendant dentist's office. The testimony of the plaintiff and the defendant, and the grounds...

  • ROUNDUP. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Feb2001, Vol. 11 Issue 111, p74 

    Presents a circuit by circuit update on corporate cases in the United States as of February 2001. Inclusion of the New York City Transit Authority's dispute of a fraudulently procured settlement and judgment in personal injury actions; Petition by Shell Oil Co. and OXY USA Inc. for a rehearing...

  • PROCEDURE--COURT.  // Landlord v. Tenant;Mar2012, p9 

    The article discusses the court cases including Cazares v. Aguilar, 19 Steven Lane Corp. v. Kovar, and Henry Phipps Plaza South Assocs. L.P. v. Rodriguez which deal with the court procedure.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics