TITLE

Analysts Worry About Future Impact of Wash., Ore. Measures

AUTHOR(S)
Williams, Rochelle
PUB. DATE
February 2001
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;02/27/2001, Vol. 335 Issue 31085, p36
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on ratings analysts and government officials' concerns about the overturning of two pro-property owner referendums in two Northwestern states, Oregon and Washington State. Violation of state constitutions; Court rulings; Trepidation over the future impact of such measures if they were to eventually pass court muster.
ACCESSION #
4155091

 

Related Articles

  • Is the Defense of Marriage Act Constitutional? Perkins, Tony // U.S. News Digital Weekly;3/11/2011, Vol. 3 Issue 10, p11 

    The author comments on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in the U.S. The conflict arises from a court ruling which declared the law's definition of marriage as unconstitutional. According to the author, it is the nature of the law that discriminates based on sexual...

  • Note and Comment.  // America;8/26/1933, Vol. 49 Issue 21, p484 

    The section presents opinions regarding several issues. One author reflects on the adoption of a code by periodical publishers. Another author reflects on the decision of the Missouri Supreme Court where the Drys of that State have lost their battle to force a referendum on the Weeks Act. Far...

  • Sex Offender Registration.  // Probation & Parole Law Reports;Jan/Feb2013, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p114 

    The article focuses on the enactment of the three-strikes law in California which applies to a criminal defendant, chow is convicted and charged of a felony. It says that after the enactment of the three-strikes law, federal appellate decisions held the 25-year-to-life sentence constituted in...

  • THE "TOUGH LITTLE BUNCH": THE RHODE ISLAND SUPREME COURT'S STRONG JUDICIAL INTEGRATION AND COMMITMENT TO JUDICIAL RESTRAINT. Tripoli, Christina M. // Albany Law Review;2010, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p1607 

    The article focuses on the Rhode Island Supreme Court, featuring its adherence to principles of judicial restraint. The Rhode Island Supreme Court maintains an integrated system, with their application of the state constitution as it is written. The author states that their fairly low reversal...

  • ORIGINALISM AND PRECEDENT. MCGINNIS, JOHN O.; RAPPAPORT, MICHAEL B. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter2011, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p121 

    An essay is presented on the combatibility of and the absence of conflict between originalism and precedent. The essayist argues that the Constitution is not displaced when a precedent is followed because it is legislated by U.S. Congress. A consequentialist's approach determines the benefits of...

  • Arizona' voters are the hardest working. Waxman, Lionel // Inside Tucson Business;11/13/2006, Vol. 16 Issue 22, p5 

    The author reflects on various referendums in Arizona. The voters decided to approve the Proposition 207, which is a reaction to the Supreme Court's interpretation of "shall not" in the constitution. Another proposition supported by the voters that will limit the discretionary powers of the...

  • OPINION.  // Crain's Detroit Business;8/27/2012, Vol. 28 Issue 36, p0008 

    The author comments on the ballot proposals that will be presented in the November 6, 2012 ballot in Michigan. Business groups believe that governing by referendum is not good government. The author adds that governing by constantly revising the constitution is a losing proposition. He says...

  • OUT OF THE BOTTLE: THE GENIE OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY. Du Vivier, K.K. // Albany Law Review;2007, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p1045 

    The article offers information about the citizen-initiated referendum or initiative. Initiative, which is considered as the genie of direct democracy, was introduced by the Progressives in the late 1800s as an alternative of amending a state constitution or developing state-level legislation....

  • DIRECT DEMOCRACY: GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE? Epstein, Richard A. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Summer2011, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p819 

    The article argues that the Gettysburg Address and U.S. national referenda and initiatives are not an appropriate template for the American Constitution. The author cites the risk that any group that can attain a majority can introduce measures in the name of the public that do not match the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics