TITLE

Bill: No Free Cable in U.S. Prisons

AUTHOR(S)
Hearn, Ted
PUB. DATE
February 2001
SOURCE
Multichannel News;02/26/2001, Vol. 22 Issue 9, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on a United States House bill that would bar the government from spending taxpayer money to provide cable television or entertainment VCR tapes and records to inmates in federal prisons. Bill introduced by Ric Keller of Florida; Comment from the Federal Bureau of Prisons and the American Civil Liberties Union.
ACCESSION #
4150146

 

Related Articles

  • Nudity clause gives cable operators pause. Stern, Christopher // Broadcasting & Cable;4/17/95, Vol. 125 Issue 16, p55 

    Reports that the amendment to the US Senate's telecommunications reform bill will put cable operators in the watchdog position. Prohibition of obscenity, indecency and nudity; Skepticism about the amendment; Opposition to the amendment.

  • Cable's take on S.652: Good news, but... Brown, Rich // Broadcasting & Cable;6/26/95, Vol. 125 Issue 26, p38 

    Reports on the impact of telecommunications reform to the cable industry. Increase in competition for cable operators; Overall positive attitude from industry; Support from Time Warner; Comcast Corp.; National Cable Television Association president Decker Anstrom.

  • Number please.  // Broadcasting & Cable;4/5/93, Vol. 123 Issue 14, p32 

    Reports that the Educational Foundation of NATPE International has slated a `tele-workshop' satellite conference on April 12, 1993 to discuss the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) pending implementation of the Cable Reregulation Act of 1992. The interactive element of the teleconference;...

  • Cable faces life with must carry. Flint, Joe // Broadcasting & Cable;4/19/93, Vol. 123 Issue 16, p66 

    Summarizes the series of court appeals and decisions which decided on making cable systems carry local broadcast signals. Provisions of must carry rules; Cable programers' arguments; Supreme Court as the final step; Judge Stephen Williams' opinion.

  • Lynch mentality.  // Broadcasting & Cable;5/10/93, Vol. 123 Issue 19, p66 

    Editorial. Criticizes cable television rates imposed by the Federal Communications Commission. Reactions by Wall Street; Rates imposition as punishment; Unfairness of the rates.

  • A fear of commitment: The Supreme Court's refusal to pronounce a first amendment standard for... Israelashvili, Diana // St. John's Law Review;Winter97, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p173 

    Opinion. Focuses on the laws governing cable televisions in the United States. Contents of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Power of cable operators to restrict the content of some programs; Requirement for the determination of the appropriate standard of...

  • Cable TV: an unnatural monopoly.  // Consumers' Research Magazine;May84, Vol. 67 Issue 5, p11 

    How misguided regulation stands between you and cable TV. Somehow cable TV has slipped past the free enterprise bulwarks that have provided unique protection to communications media throughout American history.

  • High court eyes must-carry. Wharton, Dennis // Variety;1/17/94, Vol. 353 Issue 11, p38 

    Reports on United States Supreme Court's consideration of the constitutionality of a provision included in the 1992 Cable Act. Reason for broadcast industry's support of must-carry law; Effect of Supreme Court's decision; President Bill Clinton administration's Solicitor General Drew Days III's...

  • The final chapter for cable and Congress. Brown, Stephen N. // Lightwave;Oct95, Vol. 12 Issue 11, p36 

    Reports on legislation affecting the cable television industry in the United States. Survival of broadband interactive platforms; Ratification of privately arranged compromises; Telecommunications policy.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics