TITLE

MARK G. v. SABOL: SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS, A POSSIBILITY FOR FOSTER CARE CHILDREN IN NEW YORK

AUTHOR(S)
Diebel, Beth A.
PUB. DATE
December 2000
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2000, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p823
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the New York Court of Appeals decision in Mark G. versus Sabol case which deals with substantive due process rights in child welfare. Significance of the case; Statistics of children living in foster care in New York state; Factual backgrounds of the plaintiffs involved in the case; Substantive due process rights for children in foster care in the United States; Standard of care to be applied.
ACCESSION #
4102532

 

Related Articles

  • Points and viewpoints. Fauri, David P. // Social Work;Jan78, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p62 

    The article suggests that the concept of case review boards is potentially useful for increasing the availability of administrative due process for child protective service workers and supervisors. Child protective service cases involving severe child abuse are coming increasingly to the...

  • The Legal Significance of Adolescent Development on the Right to Counsel: Establishing the Constitutional Right to Counsel for Teens in Child Welfare Matters and Assuring a Meaningful Right to Counsel in Delinquency Matters. Pokempner, Jennifer K.; Shah, Riya Saha; Houldin, Mark F.; Dale, Michael J.; Schwartz, Robert G. // Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review;Summer2012, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p529 

    No abstract available.

  • THE FORGOTTEN CHILDREN OF THE FOSTER CARE SYSTEM: MAKING A CASE FOR THE PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT STANDARD. KOEHLER, ANDREA // Golden Gate University Law Review;May2014, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p221 

    The author argues foster care caseworkers in America could be held liable for allegedly failing to carry out their duty to protect foster children if the courts in the U.S. adopted a "professional judgment" standard. A deliberate indifference standard is addressed in relation to cases involving...

  • The Oxymoron Reconsidered: Myth and Reality in the Origins of Substantive Due Process. Ely, Jr., James W. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer99, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p315 

    Traces the history of due process jurisprudence in the United States (US). Rights protected by due process laws; Origins from the Magna Carta document of 1215; Due process in jurisprudence before the US Civil War; Role of constitutional writer Thomas M. Cooley in its development.

  • Due Process. Williams, Juan // Footsteps;Mar/Apr2003, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p14 

    Reports on the right to due process in the U.S. Constitution which means that every American has the right to got to court and ask a judge to protect his or her rights. Insistence of Americans to know about the law being violated by them; Right of Americans to know about the evidence the...

  • MICHIGAN ANTI-REBATE LAW WITHSTANDS DUE PROCESS CHALLENGE.  // Journal of Insurance Regulation;Sep90, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p137 

    Focuses on a ruling by the Michigan state court that the state's anti-rebate laws do not violate the due process clause of the state constitution. Details of the case.

  • The due process counterrevolution of the 1990s? Pierce Jr., Richard J. // Columbia Law Review;Nov96, Vol. 96 Issue 7, p1973 

    Focuses on the revolution of due process in the United States. Due process of 1970 to 1972; Effect to due process on the collapse of communism and Soviet Empire; Satisfaction of due process by the usage of procedures other than trial-type hearing; Fight for prisoners' rights as the successful...

  • Money Talks. Myers, Melissa; Tucker, Michael // Echo Magazine;8/6/2009, Vol. 20 Issue 23, p26 

    The article provides an answer to a question concerning the legal process in changing the statement in wills.

  • Due Process in Parole-Release Decisions. Parsons-Lewis, Harold S. // California Law Review;Nov72, Vol. 60 Issue 6, p1518 

    Questions the nature and purpose of due process in parole-release decisions in the United States. Determinants of the parole-granting rule; Method by which the decision is made; Illustration of how existing parole-granting process exhibits fundamental infirmities in hearing procedures and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics