Abramovsky, Abraham; Edelstein, Jonathan I.
December 2000
Albany Law Review;2000, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p583
Academic Journal
Analyzes the evolution of challenges to biased jurors in New York state from the beginning of the 19th century to the enactment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 1972. Methods for challenging biased jurors; Provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law section 270.20(1)(b); Interpretation of the law by the United States Court of Appeals and by the New York courts between 1972 and 2000; Application of the law in People versus Johnson case.


Related Articles

  • GRAND JURY INNOVATION: TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL MAKEOVER OF THE ANCIENT BULWARK OF LIBERTY. Fairfax Jr., Roger A. // William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal;Dec2010, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p339 

    The article examines the American grand jury and offers ways to improve their performance of various roles. It discusses the criticisms hurled at the grand jury which include being costly, ineffective, and redundant. It details the ways which the author believes can be used in modern criminal...

  • DISCLOSURE OF FEDERAL GRAND JURY MATERIAL. Polk, Kathleen // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Sep1977, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p399 

    This article examines the growing trend among the federal courts to allow exposure of grand jury proceedings for purposes other than the prosecution or defense of the main criminal action. The purposes for grand jury secrecy in U.S. jurisdictions were set out in the case United States V. Amazon...

  • REFORMING THE JURY OVERRIDE. Richardson, John M. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter2004, Vol. 94 Issue 2, p455 

    The article reviews constitutional concerns on the introduction of bills to reform jury override in the Florida and Alabama justice system. The controversial life-to-death override should be abolished, but the death-to-life override, where the trial judge acts as a check on the sentencing...

  • A Quantitative Look at the Two-Suspect Scenario. Netter, Brian // Yale Law Journal;Mar2006, Vol. 115 Issue 5, p1167 

    The article presents a quantitative thought experiment to examine the claim that prosecutorial inconsistency is basically unreliable. It concludes that when a prosecutor is really unable to decide which of two suspects is guilty, bringing both cases to juries is the most dependable approach as...

  • Jury-Rigged. Howley, Kerry // Reason;Oct2003, Vol. 35 Issue 5, p14 

    Provides information on a study which argued that grand juries in the U.S. have become an extension of the investigative process as of October 2003. Role played by such juries; Refusal of juries in colonial Boston to indict citizens; Use of the grand jury system in law enforcement.

  • AMERICA'S ADVERSARIAL AND JURY SYSTEMS: MORE LIKELY TO DO JUSTICE. Walpin, Gerald // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter2003, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p176 

    Analyzes the adversarial and jury systems of the U.S. legal system. Discussion on attempts to discover the differences between the two systems; Benefits and shortcomings of the adversarial system; Evaluation of the legal viability of the jury system.

  • Jury Deliberations: Secrecy. McGowan, Laura // Journal of Criminal Law;Feb2006, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p19 

    The article discusses the case of a defendant who applied for the discharge of jurors on allegation that they were discriminatory and prejudiced. The defendant has been convicted of violent disorder, and has appealed with the above-mentioned ground. It is held that the judge had directed himself...

  • JUDICIAL NULLIFICATION. Antkowiak, Bruce A. // Creighton Law Review;Apr2005, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p545 

    Argues that judges should openly indulge doubts that they have about the guilt of the defendant as a mitigating factor in sentencing. Practical reasons for the indulgence; Legal theory underlying the roles of the court and jury; Background on the case of the United States v. Haut.

  • Fair challenges?: Florida to check peremptories. Frank, Cheryl // ABA Journal;Jan1985, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p16 

    Reports that Florida trial judges are exercising discretion in deciding whether peremptory challenges are being used fairly in selecting juries for criminal trials. Florida Supreme Court's decision that selecting an impartial jury may take precedence over selecting a jury from a fair...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics